StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Entity Signal vs Supabase

Entity Signal vs Supabase

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Entity Signal
Entity Signal
Stacks1
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars216
Forks23
Supabase
Supabase
Stacks531
Followers455
Votes29
GitHub Stars91.8K
Forks10.5K

Entity Signal vs Supabase: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Entity Signal and Supabase are both powerful tools that can be used in web development. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms that should be considered when choosing which one to use.

  1. Pricing: One key difference between Entity Signal and Supabase is their pricing models. Entity Signal offers a free plan with limited features, while Supabase offers a free plan with more generous limits. Additionally, Supabase also offers paid plans that provide additional features and higher usage limits.

  2. Real-time capabilities: Another important difference is the real-time capabilities of the two platforms. Entity Signal focuses on real-time data synchronization and collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same data concurrently. On the other hand, Supabase provides real-time updates through websockets, making it easier to build real-time applications.

  3. Data modeling: Entity Signal is designed to be a flexible data modeling tool, allowing users to easily create and manage complex data models. On the other hand, Supabase uses a more traditional relational database model with tables, columns, and relationships.

  4. Authentication: Supabase offers built-in authentication features, making it easy to add user authentication to your applications. Entity Signal, on the other hand, does not have built-in authentication capabilities and requires users to handle authentication themselves or integrate with other authentication providers.

  5. API and SDKs: Both Entity Signal and Supabase provide APIs and SDKs for interacting with their platforms. However, the way these APIs and SDKs are designed and implemented differs between the two platforms. Entity Signal focuses on providing a simple and intuitive API, while Supabase offers a more comprehensive and flexible SDK with support for multiple programming languages.

  6. Serverless Functions: Supabase provides the ability to write serverless functions that can be triggered by database events or API calls. This allows for more complex and dynamic logic to be implemented directly within the Supabase platform. Entity Signal does not currently offer this serverless function capability, requiring users to handle server-side logic separately.

In summary, Entity Signal and Supabase have several key differences in terms of pricing, real-time capabilities, data modeling, authentication, API and SDK design, and serverless function support. Depending on your specific needs and requirements, one platform may be more suitable for your project than the other.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Entity Signal
Entity Signal
Supabase
Supabase

It allows you to connect to Entity Framework through SignalR and get updates on subscribed data in real time. This lowers the number of refreshes done by the user and ultimately allows you to do more with fewer servers.

Supabase is currently in early-Alpha .It is an open-source Firebase alternative. It adds realtime and RESTful APIs to your PostgreSQL database without a single line of code.

realtime backend, realtime frontend, realtime, websocket, realtime data
Full Postgres database; Instant RESTful API; Realtime notifications via websockets; APIs always in sync with your schema; Custom API docs for your schema; Built-in security & monitoring
Statistics
GitHub Stars
216
GitHub Stars
91.8K
GitHub Forks
23
GitHub Forks
10.5K
Stacks
1
Stacks
531
Followers
7
Followers
455
Votes
0
Votes
29
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Relational Database
  • 6
    Self hosting
  • 3
    Postgres hosting
  • 3
    Free
  • 3
    Open source
Cons
  • 0
    No cons
Integrations
React
React
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
Streamlit
Streamlit
CodeSandbox
CodeSandbox
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Arengu
Arengu
Stream
Stream
PostgREST
PostgREST
Replibyte
Replibyte
Directus
Directus
Trevor.io
Trevor.io
Prisma
Prisma

What are some alternatives to Entity Signal, Supabase?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase