Alternatives to Enzyme logo

Alternatives to Enzyme

react-testing-library, Jest, Mocha, Cypress, and Jasmine are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Enzyme.
415
342
+ 1
0

What is Enzyme and what are its top alternatives?

Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.
Enzyme is a tool in the Javascript Testing Framework category of a tech stack.
Enzyme is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Enzyme's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Enzyme

  • react-testing-library
    react-testing-library

    It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices. ...

  • Jest
    Jest

    Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

  • Mocha
    Mocha

    Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases. ...

  • Cypress
    Cypress

    Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website. ...

  • Jasmine
    Jasmine

    Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run. ...

  • Chai
    Chai

    It is a BDD / TDD assertion library for node and the browser that can be delightfully paired with any javascript testing framework. It has several interfaces that allow the developer to choose the most comfortable. The chain-capable BDD styles provide an expressive language & readable style, while the TDD assert style provides a more classical feel. ...

  • Protractor
    Protractor

    Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would. ...

  • SinonJS
    SinonJS

    It is a really helpful library when you want to unit test your code. It supports spies, stubs, and mocks. The library has cross browser support and also can run on the server using Node.js. ...

Enzyme alternatives & related posts

react-testing-library logo

react-testing-library

212
138
4
A lightweight solution for testing React components
212
138
+ 1
4
PROS OF REACT-TESTING-LIBRARY
  • 3
    We can test behavior
  • 1
    Good documentation
CONS OF REACT-TESTING-LIBRARY
    Be the first to leave a con

    related react-testing-library posts

    I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

    We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

    Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis  for cache and other time sensitive operations.

    We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

    Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

    See more
    Jest logo

    Jest

    3.6K
    2.8K
    169
    Painless JavaScript Unit Testing
    3.6K
    2.8K
    + 1
    169
    PROS OF JEST
    • 35
      Open source
    • 31
      Mock by default makes testing much simpler
    • 22
      Testing React Native Apps
    • 19
      Parallel test running
    • 15
      Fast
    • 13
      Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing
    • 8
      Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests
    • 7
      Out of the box code coverage
    • 6
      Promise support
    • 6
      One stop shop for unit testing
    • 3
      Great documentation
    • 2
      Assert Library Included
    • 1
      Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu
    • 1
      Preset support
    • 0
      Karma
    • 0
      Can be used for BDD
    CONS OF JEST
    • 3
      Ambiguous configuration
    • 3
      Difficult
    • 3
      Documentation
    • 2
      Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting
    • 2
      Multiple error messages for same error
    • 2
      Difficult to run single test/describe/file
    • 2
      Ambiguous
    • 2
      Bugged
    • 1
      Slow
    • 1
      Reporter is too general
    • 1
      BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail
    • 1
      Unstable
    • 1
      Bad docs
    • 1
      Still does't support .mjs files natively
    • 1
      Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests
    • 0
      Interaction with watch mode on terminal

    related Jest posts

    Robert Zuber

    We are in the process of adopting Next.js as our React framework and using Storybook to help build our React components in isolation. This new part of our frontend is written in TypeScript, and we use Emotion for CSS/styling. For delivering data, we use GraphQL and Apollo. Jest, Percy, and Cypress are used for testing.

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    CypressCypressJestJest

    As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

    See more
    Mocha logo

    Mocha

    3.3K
    2.7K
    430
    Simple, flexible, fun javascript test framework for node.js & the browser
    3.3K
    2.7K
    + 1
    430
    PROS OF MOCHA
    • 137
      Open source
    • 102
      Simple
    • 81
      Promise support
    • 48
      Flexible
    • 29
      Easy to add support for Generators
    • 12
      For browser and server testing
    • 7
      Curstom assertion libraries
    • 5
      Works with Karma
    • 3
      No other better tools
    • 1
      Simple setup
    • 1
      Works with saucelabs
    • 1
      Lots of tutorials and help online
    • 1
      Default reporter is nice, clean, and itemized
    • 1
      Works with BrowserStack
    • 1
      Simple integration testing
    CONS OF MOCHA
    • 3
      Cannot test a promisified functions without assertion
    • 2
      No assertion count in results
    • 1
      Not as many reporter options as Jest

    related Mocha posts

    I use both mocha and Jest because:

    • I don't care whether teams use Jest or Mocha. But jest is way too overhyped. Most devs are writing integration tests and think that it's so much better but frankly I don't write integration tests as the way to get both design feedback and confidence when I code. I adhere to the test pyramid, not ice cream cone or the dumb "trophy"

    • I TDD, so I only ever use the "API" of test frameworks. I don't do a lot of integration tests for TDD and all the bells and whistles Jest provides you from the command-line I just don't need. And I certainly do not care about or touch Jest Snapshots, I despise them

    • My tests are fast enough because I write isolated tests with TDD, so I don't run into performance issues. Example: I write my tests in a way that I can run 300 tests in literally 1 second with mocha. So the Jest ability to pinpoint and only run those tests which are affected by code changes. I want to run all of them every time when I TDD. It's a different mindset when you TDD

    • I also mainly code in IntelliJ or WebStorm because I feel the tools in that IDE far surpass VSCode and I also love running the test UI runner in it vs. lousy command-line

    • I feel both mocha and Jest read just fine in terms of code readability. Jest might have shorter assertion syntax but I don't really care. I just care that I can read the damn test and my tests are written well and my test descriptions, as well as the code itself including constants represent business language, not technical. I care most about BDD, clean code, 4 rules of simple design, and SOLID

    • I don't like using mock frameworks so no I don't use Jest's Mocking framework. I don't have to mock a lot in my tests due to the nature of how I strive to code...I keep my design simple and modular using principals such as clean code and 4 rules of simple design. If I must mock, I create very simple custom mocks with JS

    • On the contrary to the belief that integration tests and mount are the way to go (this belief drives me absolutely crazy, especially Dodd's promoting that), I TDD with shallow & enzyme. My tests are simple. My design is driven by my tests and my tests give me quick and useful feedback. I have a course I'm working on coming out soon on TDD with React to show you how to truly test the FE and why the ice cream cone and trophy suck (you're being scammed people). Watch for that here: https://twitter.com/DaveSchinkel/status/1062267649235791873

    Don't forget to upvote this post!

    Mocha Jest JavaScript React @jsdom Enzyme #tdd #bdd #testdrivendevelopment

    See more
    Jack Graves
    Head of Product Development at Automation Consultants · | 4 upvotes · 152.9K views

    We use JUnit and Jest to perform the bulk of our automated test scenarios, with additional work with Apache JMeter for performance testing - for example, the Atlassian Data Center compliance testing is performed with JMeter. Jest provides testing for the React interfaces, which make up the backend of our App offerings. JUnit is used for Unit Testing our Server-based Apps. Mocha is another tool we use.

    See more
    Cypress logo

    Cypress

    1.6K
    1.8K
    111
    When testing is easy, developers build better things faster and with confidence.
    1.6K
    1.8K
    + 1
    111
    PROS OF CYPRESS
    • 28
      Open source
    • 21
      Great documentation
    • 19
      Simple usage
    • 18
      Fast
    • 10
      Cross Browser testing
    • 9
      Easy us with CI
    • 5
      Npm install cypress only
    • 1
      Good for beginner automation engineers
    CONS OF CYPRESS
    • 20
      Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
    • 13
      Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
    • 12
      No iFrame support
    • 9
      No multiple domain support
    • 9
      No page object support
    • 8
      No file upload support
    • 8
      No support for multiple tab control
    • 8
      No xPath support
    • 7
      No support for Safari
    • 7
      Cypress doesn't support native app
    • 7
      Re-run failed tests retries not supported yet
    • 7
      No support for multiple browser control
    • 4
      Adobe
    • 4
      Using a non-standard automation protocol
    • 4
      Not freeware
    • 4
      $20/user/thread for reports
    • 3
      No 'WD wire protocol' support

    related Cypress posts

    Kamil Kowalski
    Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 1.7M views

    When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

    See more
    Robert Zuber

    We are in the process of adopting Next.js as our React framework and using Storybook to help build our React components in isolation. This new part of our frontend is written in TypeScript, and we use Emotion for CSS/styling. For delivering data, we use GraphQL and Apollo. Jest, Percy, and Cypress are used for testing.

    See more
    Jasmine logo

    Jasmine

    1.2K
    1.4K
    186
    DOM-less simple JavaScript testing framework
    1.2K
    1.4K
    + 1
    186
    PROS OF JASMINE
    • 64
      Can also be used for tdd
    • 49
      Open source
    • 18
      Originally from RSpec
    • 15
      Great community
    • 14
      No dependencies, not even DOM
    • 10
      Easy to setup
    • 8
      Simple
    • 3
      Created by Pivotal-Labs
    • 2
      Works with KarmaJs
    • 1
      Jasmine is faster than selenium in angular application
    • 1
      SpyOn to fake calls
    • 1
      Async and promises are easy calls with "done"
    CONS OF JASMINE
    • 2
      Unfriendly error logs

    related Jasmine posts

    Joshua Dean Küpper
    CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 6 upvotes · 209.4K views

    For our internal team and collaboration panel we use Nuxt.js (with TypeScript that is transpiled into ES6), Webpack and npm. We enjoy the opinionated nature of Nuxt.js over vanilla Vue.js, as we would end up using all of the components Nuxt.js incorporates anyways and we can adhere to the conventions setup by the Nuxt.js project, which allows us to get better support in case we run into any dead ends. Webpack allows us to create reproducable builds and also debug our application with hot reloads, which greately increased the pace at which we are able to perform and test changes. We also incorporated a lot of testing (ESLint, Chai, Jasmine, Nightwatchjs) into our pipelines and can trigger those jobs through GitLab CI. All packages are fetched through npm, so that we can keep our git repositories slim and are notified of new updates aswell as reported security flaws.

    See more
    Sai Chaitanya Mankala
    Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 146K views

    Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

    We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

    See more
    Chai logo

    Chai

    539
    170
    0
    A BDD / TDD assertion library
    539
    170
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF CHAI
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF CHAI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Chai posts

        Joshua Dean Küpper
        CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 6 upvotes · 209.4K views

        For our internal team and collaboration panel we use Nuxt.js (with TypeScript that is transpiled into ES6), Webpack and npm. We enjoy the opinionated nature of Nuxt.js over vanilla Vue.js, as we would end up using all of the components Nuxt.js incorporates anyways and we can adhere to the conventions setup by the Nuxt.js project, which allows us to get better support in case we run into any dead ends. Webpack allows us to create reproducable builds and also debug our application with hot reloads, which greately increased the pace at which we are able to perform and test changes. We also incorporated a lot of testing (ESLint, Chai, Jasmine, Nightwatchjs) into our pipelines and can trigger those jobs through GitLab CI. All packages are fetched through npm, so that we can keep our git repositories slim and are notified of new updates aswell as reported security flaws.

        See more

        React LoopBack Node.js ExpressJS Elasticsearch Kibana Logstash Sequelize Mocha Chai Visual Studio Code are the combo of technologies being used by me to build BestPrice Extension with all its micro-services & Web-based fragments

        See more
        Protractor logo

        Protractor

        453
        524
        33
        End-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications
        453
        524
        + 1
        33
        PROS OF PROTRACTOR
        • 9
          Easy setup
        • 8
          Quick tests implementation
        • 6
          Flexible
        • 5
          Open source
        • 5
          Promise support
        CONS OF PROTRACTOR
        • 4
          Limited

        related Protractor posts

        Raziel Alron
        Automation Engineer at Tipalti · | 7 upvotes · 271.8K views

        Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

        See more
        Sai Chaitanya Mankala
        Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 146K views

        Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

        We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

        See more
        SinonJS logo

        SinonJS

        224
        35
        1
        Standalone test spies, stubs and mocks for JavaScript
        224
        35
        + 1
        1
        PROS OF SINONJS
        • 1
          Open source
        CONS OF SINONJS
        • 1
          More concepts than Jest
        • 1
          Less questions and answers on StackOverflow than Jest

        related SinonJS posts