Enzyme vs SuperTest

Overview

SuperTest

Stacks1.9K

Followers102

Votes0

Enzyme

Stacks1.7K

Followers349

Votes0

Enzyme vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

API Testing vs. Component Testing: Enzyme is primarily used for testing React components, allowing developers to simulate user interactions and assert on the output. In contrast, SuperTest is more focused on API testing, enabling developers to make HTTP requests and test the responses from the server.
Shallow Rendering vs. Full DOM Rendering: Enzyme provides shallow rendering, which renders only the component being tested and none of its child components, making it faster but limited in scope. On the other hand, SuperTest offers full DOM rendering, which renders the entire component tree, providing a more comprehensive testing environment but potentially slower in performance.
Component-specific vs. End-to-End Testing: Enzyme is ideal for unit and integration testing of React components in isolation, making it suitable for component-specific testing scenarios. SuperTest, on the other hand, excels at end-to-end testing, where it interacts with the API and tests the entire system, including the server and external components.
Syntax and Programming Languages: Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility specifically designed for React, while SuperTest is a testing library for Node.js HTTP servers, making them suitable for testing applications written in their respective languages.
Mocking capabilities: Enzyme provides built-in utilities for mocking components and functions, making it easier to isolate components for testing. In comparison, SuperTest lacks these built-in mocking capabilities and relies on external libraries for complex mocking scenarios.
Community and Support: Enzyme has a larger community and extensive documentation available, making it easier for developers to find solutions to common testing problems. SuperTest also has a strong community, but the support and resources may not be as abundant compared to Enzyme.

In Summary, Enzyme is ideal for component testing in React applications, offering shallow rendering and strong community support, while SuperTest is more suited for API and end-to-end testing in Node.js applications, providing full DOM rendering and robust capabilities for interacting with servers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SuperTest, Enzyme

Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

Postman will be used to do integration testing with the backend API we create. It offers a clean interface to create many requests, and you can even organize these requests into collections. It helps to test the backend API first to make sure it's working before using it in the front-end. Jest can also be used for testing and is already embedded into React. Not only does it offer unit testing support in javascript, it can also do snapshot testing for the front-end to make sure components are rendering correctly. Enzyme is complementary to Jest and offers more functions such as shallow rendering. UnitTest will be used for Python testing as it is simple, has a lot of functionality and already built in with python. Sentry will be used for keeping track of errors as it is also easily integratable with Heroku because they offer it as an add-on. LogDNA will be used for tracking logs which are not errors and is also a Heroku add-on. Its good to have a separate service to record logs, monitor, track and even fix errors in real-time so our application can run more smoothly.

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SuperTest	Enzyme
It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.	Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.
HTTP assertions;Asynchronous;Promise support	Shallow rendering; Full DOM rendering; Static rendered markup; React Hooks support
Statistics
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 1.7K
Followers 102	Followers 349
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	React

What are some alternatives to SuperTest, Enzyme?

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Related Comparisons

Enzyme vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

API Testing vs. Component Testing: Enzyme is primarily used for testing React components, allowing developers to simulate user interactions and assert on the output. In contrast, SuperTest is more focused on API testing, enabling developers to make HTTP requests and test the responses from the server.
Shallow Rendering vs. Full DOM Rendering: Enzyme provides shallow rendering, which renders only the component being tested and none of its child components, making it faster but limited in scope. On the other hand, SuperTest offers full DOM rendering, which renders the entire component tree, providing a more comprehensive testing environment but potentially slower in performance.
Component-specific vs. End-to-End Testing: Enzyme is ideal for unit and integration testing of React components in isolation, making it suitable for component-specific testing scenarios. SuperTest, on the other hand, excels at end-to-end testing, where it interacts with the API and tests the entire system, including the server and external components.
Syntax and Programming Languages: Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility specifically designed for React, while SuperTest is a testing library for Node.js HTTP servers, making them suitable for testing applications written in their respective languages.
Mocking capabilities: Enzyme provides built-in utilities for mocking components and functions, making it easier to isolate components for testing. In comparison, SuperTest lacks these built-in mocking capabilities and relies on external libraries for complex mocking scenarios.
Community and Support: Enzyme has a larger community and extensive documentation available, making it easier for developers to find solutions to common testing problems. SuperTest also has a strong community, but the support and resources may not be as abundant compared to Enzyme.

Enzyme vs SuperTest

Overview