StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs Gerrit Code Review

ESLint vs Gerrit Code Review

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

ESLint vs Gerrit Code Review: What are the differences?

1. **Linting Tool**: ESLint is a linting tool that helps developers identify and fix problems in their JavaScript code based on a set of predefined rules, while Gerrit Code Review is a code review tool that facilitates collaborative code reviews among developers. 2. **Integration with IDEs**: ESLint can be integrated with various Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) such as Visual Studio Code, Sublime Text, and Atom, providing real-time feedback to developers as they write code. On the other hand, Gerrit Code Review is often used independently of IDEs and is primarily focused on reviewing code changes made by developers. 3. **Code Quality Focus**: ESLint's primary focus is on enforcing code quality and best practices by detecting potential errors or style inconsistencies in the codebase, ensuring that the code meets certain standards. In contrast, Gerrit Code Review focuses on reviewing code changes for correctness, functionality, and adherence to project-specific guidelines. 4. **Automated vs. Manual Review**: ESLint performs automated static code analysis to identify issues in the code automatically without human intervention, whereas Gerrit Code Review requires manual inspection and approval by human reviewers before changes are merged into the codebase. 5. **Continuous Integration**: ESLint can be seamlessly integrated into a Continuous Integration (CI) pipeline to enforce code quality standards across the development workflow, while Gerrit Code Review provides a platform for conducting code reviews as part of the development process within the version control system. 6. **Scope of Use**: ESLint is primarily used during the development phase to catch issues early and improve code quality, whereas Gerrit Code Review is used during the code review process to ensure that changes are thoroughly evaluated before merging them into the codebase.

In Summary, ESLint focuses on code quality enforcement through automated static analysis, while Gerrit Code Review facilitates manual code reviews for correctness and collaboration among developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ESLint, Gerrit Code Review

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ESLint
ESLint
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

-
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38.6K
Stacks
116
Followers
14.0K
Followers
223
Votes
28
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 6
    Free
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to ESLint, Gerrit Code Review?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana