StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs Hound

ESLint vs Hound

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hound
Hound
Stacks41
Followers47
Votes14
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

ESLint vs Hound: What are the differences?

# Introduction

  1. Setup and Configuration: ESLint is a pluggable linting utility for JavaScript and JSX, while Hound is specifically designed for Ruby code. The setup and configuration process for ESLint involves installing ESLint via npm and creating an ESLint configuration file, whereas Hound requires the Hound gem to be added to the Gemfile and configured through a .hound.yml file.

  2. Rule Customization: ESLint offers a wide range of customizable rules that can be adjusted to fit specific coding styles and preferences. On the other hand, Hound has a predefined set of rules that cannot be modified, providing a more standardized approach to linting Ruby code.

  3. Flexibility: ESLint provides flexibility in the sense that developers can choose from a variety of plugins and configuration options to tailor the linting process to their needs. In contrast, Hound is more rigid in terms of rule enforcement, offering a simpler, less customizable linting experience.

  4. Language Support: ESLint is primarily focused on JavaScript and JSX linting, but it also has support for other languages such as TypeScript and Vue.js. In comparison, Hound is specifically designed for Ruby code linting, making it a more specialized tool for Ruby developers.

  5. Popular Usage: ESLint is widely used in the JavaScript community and has a large user base with extensive documentation and community support. While Hound is popular among Ruby developers, it may not have the same level of widespread adoption and community resources as ESLint.

  6. Integration with Tools: ESLint integrates seamlessly with various development tools and IDEs, allowing developers to run linting checks directly within their workflow. On the other hand, Hound may have limited integration options compared to ESLint, potentially impacting the ease of use for developers.

In Summary, ESLint and Hound differ in setup and configuration, rule customization, flexibility, language support, popular usage, and integration with tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hound, ESLint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hound
Hound
ESLint
ESLint

Automated code review for GitHub pull requests. It comments on code quality and style issues, allowing you and your team to better review and maintain a clean codebase.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Open source; Free for public repos; Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests;GitHub App
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
41
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
47
Followers
14.0K
Votes
14
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Comments on style so I don't have to
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Easy configuration
  • 2
    Inline comments
  • 2
    Free for OSS
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Focuses code review on quality not style
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
SwiftLint
SwiftLint
RuboCop
RuboCop
Credo
Credo
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Hound, ESLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana