StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs Pylint

ESLint vs Pylint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K
Pylint
Pylint
Stacks873
Followers97
Votes17

ESLint vs Pylint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

ESLint and Pylint are both static code analysis tools that help identify and report code quality issues and potential bugs. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences in their features and capabilities.

  1. Language Support: The primary difference between ESLint and Pylint lies in the programming languages they support. ESLint is primarily used for JavaScript, while Pylint is intended for Python code analysis. This language-specific focus allows each tool to cater to the unique syntax and conventions of their respective languages.

  2. Configurability: Another significant difference is the level of configurability each tool offers. ESLint provides extensive configuration options, allowing developers to customize the linting rules according to their project's specific requirements. On the other hand, Pylint follows a more opinionated approach, providing a predefined set of rules that may be less customizable.

  3. Plugin Ecosystem: ESLint has a thriving plugin ecosystem, with a wide range of plugins available for various JavaScript frameworks, libraries, and coding styles. This extensive plugin support enhances the tool's versatility and makes it suitable for different use cases. In contrast, Pylint's plugin ecosystem is relatively smaller, with fewer options available to extend its functionality.

  4. Integration with Build Systems: Both ESLint and Pylint can be integrated into popular build systems such as webpack, npm, and Jenkins. However, the integration process and configuration may differ. ESLint has smoother integration with JavaScript build systems and package managers, while Pylint integrates more seamlessly with Python-centric build systems and package managers.

  5. Rule Sets: ESLint and Pylint have different rule sets and approaches to code analysis. ESLint focuses on enforcing best practices, catching potential errors, and maintaining code readability and consistency. Pylint, on the other hand, emphasizes the adherence to coding standards, enforcing a strict style guide, and detecting potential errors in Python code.

  6. Community and Adoption: ESLint has a larger and more active community compared to Pylint. This robust community support translates into frequent updates, bug fixes, and an extensive collection of online resources, making it easier to troubleshoot and learn from others' experiences. Pylint, although less popular, still has an active community that contributes to its development and maintenance.

In summary, ESLint and Pylint differ in terms of language support, configurability, plugin ecosystem, integration with build systems, rule sets, and community adoption. These differences make them better suited for their respective programming languages and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ESLint, Pylint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ESLint
ESLint
Pylint
Pylint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

It is a Python static code analysis tool which looks for programming errors, helps enforcing a coding standard, sniffs for code smells and offers simple refactoring suggestions.

-
Syntax Check;Style Check;Warnings
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38.6K
Stacks
873
Followers
14.0K
Followers
97
Votes
28
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Pros
  • 3
    Command Line
  • 2
    Code score & directions
  • 2
    Standards
  • 2
    IDE Integration
  • 2
    FOSS
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Debian
Debian
Vim
Vim
Windows
Windows
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
TextMate
TextMate
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Komodo IDE
Komodo IDE
Eclipse
Eclipse
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code

What are some alternatives to ESLint, Pylint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana