StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. ESLint vs StyleCI

ESLint vs StyleCI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

StyleCI
StyleCI
Stacks28
Followers37
Votes4
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

ESLint vs StyleCI: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of coding standards and style enforcement, tools like ESLint and StyleCI play a vital role in ensuring consistent and clean code. Understanding the key differences between these two popular tools can help developers choose the right one for their projects.

  1. Configuration: ESLint allows for extensive customization and configuration through its configuration files, making it highly flexible to tailor to specific project needs. On the other hand, StyleCI aims to provide a more standardized approach to coding standards without a high level of configurability.

  2. Supported Languages: ESLint primarily targets JavaScript, while StyleCI is more focused on PHP coding standards. This difference in language support can be a crucial factor in choosing between the two tools based on the project's tech stack.

  3. Integration: ESLint is commonly integrated into the developer's workflow through tools like IDE plugins or build processes, offering real-time feedback during code writing. In comparison, StyleCI operates as a cloud-based service, providing automated code styling through GitHub integrations.

  4. Rule Coverage: ESLint offers a comprehensive set of rules for detecting potential errors, code smells, and style inconsistencies within JavaScript codebases. While StyleCI also enforces coding styles, its rule set may not be as extensive or customizable as ESLint's.

  5. Community Support: As ESLint has been around longer and established itself as a popular tool within the JavaScript community, it boasts a larger user base and active community that contributes to its development and rule set. StyleCI, being more specialized in PHP, may have a smaller user base and community in comparison.

  6. Pricing Model: ESLint is an open-source tool, meaning it can be freely used and customized by developers. On the other hand, StyleCI operates on a subscription-based model, offering different pricing plans based on the team size and requirements. The pricing structure can be a determining factor for organizations considering between ESLint and StyleCI.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between ESLint and StyleCI in areas such as configuration, language support, integration, rule coverage, community support, and pricing can help developers make informed decisions on selecting the appropriate tool for their coding standards enforcement needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on StyleCI, ESLint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

StyleCI
StyleCI
ESLint
ESLint

StyleCI automatically analyses all of your pull requests and will display a build status within GitHub before you merge.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Fix PSR-1, PSR-2, PSR-5, Symfony and more.;We watch all of your pull requests and automatically analyse them.;Open Source
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
28
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
37
Followers
14.0K
Votes
4
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Keeps code style consistent adheres to strict standard
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 6
    Free
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to StyleCI, ESLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana