StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Firebase Authentication vs FreeRADIUS

Firebase Authentication vs FreeRADIUS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FreeRADIUS
FreeRADIUS
Stacks28
Followers36
Votes1
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Stacks533
Followers610
Votes55

Firebase Authentication vs FreeRADIUS : What are the differences?

Introduction

Firebase Authentication and FreeRADIUS are two different authentication systems that serve different purposes. Here are the key differences between them:

  1. Integration with Web or Mobile Applications: Firebase Authentication is specifically designed for easy integration with web and mobile applications. It provides a range of authentication methods including email and password, social media logins, and phone number authentication. FreeRADIUS, on the other hand, is an open-source authentication system primarily used in network environments for authenticating users connecting to network services.

  2. Hosted vs Self-hosted: Firebase Authentication is a hosted service provided by Google, meaning that you don't have to worry about managing the infrastructure or scalability aspects. You can simply use Firebase's API and SDKs to integrate authentication in your applications. FreeRADIUS, however, requires setting up and maintaining your own server infrastructure to use it. This gives you more control but also adds an overhead of managing hardware and software.

  3. Supported Protocols: Firebase Authentication mainly supports modern authentication protocols such as OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It integrates well with popular platforms and frameworks like Firebase, Google Cloud, and FirebaseUI. FreeRADIUS, on the other hand, supports a wide range of authentication protocols including PAP, CHAP, MS-CHAP, and EAP. It offers compatibility with various network protocols like RADIUS and Diameter.

  4. User Management Features: Firebase Authentication provides several user management features out-of-the-box, such as email verification, password reset, and account linking. It also offers user role management and customizable user profiles. FreeRADIUS, being a network authentication system, focuses more on user authentication and authorization rather than user management features.

  5. Scalability and Performance: Firebase Authentication is designed to scale automatically as your user base grows. It leverages Google's infrastructure, ensuring high availability and performance. FreeRADIUS, being a self-hosted system, scalability and performance depend on the resources of the server infrastructure you set up. It can be configured for high performance, but it requires manual optimization and tweaks.

  6. Pricing: Firebase Authentication offers a free tier that allows a certain number of monthly active users per month, with additional charges for higher usage. FreeRADIUS is open-source software, which means you can use it for free without any licensing cost. However, setting up and maintaining the server infrastructure for FreeRADIUS may incur costs for hardware, software, and maintenance.

In summary, Firebase Authentication is a hosted service designed for easy integration with web and mobile applications, while FreeRADIUS is a self-hosted authentication system primarily used in network environments. Firebase Authentication provides user management features, supports modern authentication protocols, and offers scalability, while FreeRADIUS offers more advanced network authentication protocols and gives you more control over your infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FreeRADIUS
FreeRADIUS
Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication

It is the open source implementation of RADIUS, an IETF protocol for AAA (Authorisation, Authentication, and Accounting).. It is responsible for authenticating one third of all users on the Internet.

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Statistics
Stacks
28
Stacks
533
Followers
36
Followers
610
Votes
1
Votes
55
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Very Lightweight
Pros
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
Cons
  • 6
    Heavy webpack
Integrations
PHP
PHP
MySQL
MySQL
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to FreeRADIUS , Firebase Authentication?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope