Flux CD vs Velero

Overview

Flux CD

Stacks81

Followers76

Votes1

GitHub Stars6.9K

Forks1.1K

Velero

Stacks28

Followers15

Votes0

GitHub Stars9.6K

Forks1.5K

Flux CD vs Velero: What are the differences?

Introduction: Flux CD and Velero are two popular tools in the DevOps and cloud-native ecosystem. They serve different purposes and offer distinct functionalities. This Markdown code highlights the key differences between Flux CD and Velero, providing specific details to help users understand their unique capabilities.

Deployment automation vs. Backup and restore: Flux CD focuses on continuous delivery and deployment automation. It helps in automating the deployment of applications and ensures that the desired state of the cluster matches the actual state. On the other hand, Velero is specifically designed for backup and restore operations in Kubernetes clusters. It provides capabilities to backup and restore persistent volumes, custom resources, and namespaces, offering a safety net for disaster recovery.
Continuous deployment vs. Disaster recovery: Flux CD primarily aims at automating continuous delivery and deployment workflows. It enables developers to effortlessly manage and release applications in a Kubernetes cluster. In contrast, Velero focuses on disaster recovery by providing backup and restore functionalities. It helps organizations ensure data resilience and minimize data loss in case of unforeseen events or failures.
GitOps mentality vs. Data protection and recovery: As a GitOps tool, Flux CD follows the GitOps mentality where the desired state of the cluster is defined declaratively in Git repositories. It automates the reconciliation of desired state and actual state based on Git commits and triggers deployments accordingly. Velero, on the other hand, focuses on data protection and recovery. It enables regular backups of the Kubernetes cluster state and facilitates restoration in case of data corruption, hardware failure, or other similar scenarios.
Seamless application deployments vs. Data migration: With Flux CD, developers can easily automate and manage application deployments on Kubernetes clusters. It streamlines the release process and eliminates manual intervention. In contrast, Velero offers data migration capabilities, allowing users to move workloads and their associated data across different clusters or cloud providers. This makes it useful for workload transfer and multi-cluster management scenarios.
Built-in GitOps workflows vs. Extensible plugin ecosystem: Flux CD provides built-in GitOps workflows and supports declarative configuration files, enabling easy integration with Git repositories and CI/CD pipelines. It simplifies the adoption of GitOps practices by developers. Velero, on the other hand, offers an extensible plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend its functionalities and integrate with other tools or services. This flexibility enables users to adapt Velero to their specific backup and restore requirements.
Cluster-wide deployment management vs. Namespace-focused operations: Flux CD operates at the cluster level, allowing users to manage deployments across multiple namespaces and applications. It provides a central management point for cluster-wide continuous delivery. In contrast, Velero focuses on namespace-level operations. It enables backup and restore operations for specific namespaces, making it easier for users to handle backups and recoveries on a per-namespace basis.

In summary, Flux CD is geared towards automating continuous delivery and deployment workflows, while Velero specializes in backup, restore, and disaster recovery functionalities in Kubernetes clusters. Flux CD emphasizes GitOps mentality, seamless application deployments, and cluster-wide management, whereas Velero prioritizes data protection, data migration, and namespace-focused operations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Flux CD	Velero
It is a tool that automatically ensures that the state of your Kubernetes cluster matches the configuration you’ve supplied in Git. It uses an operator in the cluster to trigger deployments inside Kubernetes, which means that you don’t need a separate continuous delivery tool.	It is an open source tool to safely backup and restore, perform disaster recovery, and migrate Kubernetes cluster resources and persistent volumes.
Describe the entire desired state of your system in Git. This includes apps, configuration, dashboards, monitoring, and everything else; Use YAML to enforce conformance to the declared system. You don’t need to run kubectl because all changes go through Git. Use diffing tools to detect divergence between observed and desired state and receive notifications; Everything is controlled through pull requests, which means no learning curve for new developers. Just use your standard PR process. Your Git history provides a sequence of transactions, allowing you to recover system state from any snapshot. Fix a production issue via pull request rather than making changes to the running system	Take backups of your cluster and restore in case of loss; Migrate cluster resources to other clusters; Replicate your production cluster to development and testing clusters
Statistics
GitHub Stars 6.9K	GitHub Stars 9.6K
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 81	Stacks 28
Followers 76	Followers 15
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Open Source	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git Kubernetes YAML	Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Flux CD, Velero?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Flux CD vs Velero: What are the differences?

Deployment automation vs. Backup and restore: Flux CD focuses on continuous delivery and deployment automation. It helps in automating the deployment of applications and ensures that the desired state of the cluster matches the actual state. On the other hand, Velero is specifically designed for backup and restore operations in Kubernetes clusters. It provides capabilities to backup and restore persistent volumes, custom resources, and namespaces, offering a safety net for disaster recovery.
Continuous deployment vs. Disaster recovery: Flux CD primarily aims at automating continuous delivery and deployment workflows. It enables developers to effortlessly manage and release applications in a Kubernetes cluster. In contrast, Velero focuses on disaster recovery by providing backup and restore functionalities. It helps organizations ensure data resilience and minimize data loss in case of unforeseen events or failures.
GitOps mentality vs. Data protection and recovery: As a GitOps tool, Flux CD follows the GitOps mentality where the desired state of the cluster is defined declaratively in Git repositories. It automates the reconciliation of desired state and actual state based on Git commits and triggers deployments accordingly. Velero, on the other hand, focuses on data protection and recovery. It enables regular backups of the Kubernetes cluster state and facilitates restoration in case of data corruption, hardware failure, or other similar scenarios.
Seamless application deployments vs. Data migration: With Flux CD, developers can easily automate and manage application deployments on Kubernetes clusters. It streamlines the release process and eliminates manual intervention. In contrast, Velero offers data migration capabilities, allowing users to move workloads and their associated data across different clusters or cloud providers. This makes it useful for workload transfer and multi-cluster management scenarios.
Built-in GitOps workflows vs. Extensible plugin ecosystem: Flux CD provides built-in GitOps workflows and supports declarative configuration files, enabling easy integration with Git repositories and CI/CD pipelines. It simplifies the adoption of GitOps practices by developers. Velero, on the other hand, offers an extensible plugin ecosystem that allows users to extend its functionalities and integrate with other tools or services. This flexibility enables users to adapt Velero to their specific backup and restore requirements.
Cluster-wide deployment management vs. Namespace-focused operations: Flux CD operates at the cluster level, allowing users to manage deployments across multiple namespaces and applications. It provides a central management point for cluster-wide continuous delivery. In contrast, Velero focuses on namespace-level operations. It enables backup and restore operations for specific namespaces, making it easier for users to handle backups and recoveries on a per-namespace basis.

Flux CD vs Velero

Overview