StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. FortiAuthenticator vs LDAP

FortiAuthenticator vs LDAP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator
Stacks4
Followers11
Votes0
LDAP
LDAP
Stacks76
Followers70
Votes0

LDAP vs FortiAuthenticator: What are the differences?

LDAP: A lightweight directory access protocol. It is a mature, flexible, and well supported standards-based mechanism for interacting with directory servers. It’s often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications, but an LDAP directory server is a fairly general-purpose data store and can be used in a wide variety of applications; FortiAuthenticator: Access Management and Single Sign-On. It provides services which are key in creating effective security policy, strengthening security by ensuring only the right person at the right time can access your sensitive networks and data.

LDAP and FortiAuthenticator can be categorized as "User Management and Authentication" tools.

Some of the features offered by LDAP are:

  • Lightweight directory access protocol
  • Used for authentication and storing information
  • General-purpose data store

On the other hand, FortiAuthenticator provides the following key features:

  • Ability to transparently identify network users and enforce identity-driven policy on a Fortinet-enabled enterprise network
  • Seamless secure two-factor/OTP authentication across the organization in conjunction with FortiToken
  • Certificate management for enterprise wireless and VPN deployment

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FortiAuthenticator
FortiAuthenticator
LDAP
LDAP

It provides services which are key in creating effective security policy, strengthening security by ensuring only the right person at the right time can access your sensitive networks and data.

It is a mature, flexible, and well supported standards-based mechanism for interacting with directory servers. It’s often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications, but an LDAP directory server is a fairly general-purpose data store and can be used in a wide variety of applications.

Ability to transparently identify network users and enforce identity-driven policy on a Fortinet-enabled enterprise network; Seamless secure two-factor/OTP authentication across the organization in conjunction with FortiToken; Certificate management for enterprise wireless and VPN deployment; Guest management for wired and wireless network security; Single Sign On capabilities for both internal and cloud networks
Lightweight directory access protocol; Used for authentication and storing information; General-purpose data store
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
76
Followers
11
Followers
70
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to FortiAuthenticator, LDAP?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope