StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Foundation for Apps vs UIkIt

Foundation for Apps vs UIkIt

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

UIkIt
UIkIt
Stacks791
Followers417
Votes262
GitHub Stars18.5K
Forks2.3K
Foundation for Apps
Foundation for Apps
Stacks31
Followers42
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.6K
Forks215

Foundation for Apps vs UIkIt: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Foundation for Apps and UIkIt

<Write Introduction here>

1. **CSS Flexbox Support**: Foundation for Apps utilizes CSS Flexbox extensively for layout, providing a more modern and flexible approach to responsiveness compared to UIkit which primarily relies on grid-based systems like Bootstrap.
   
2. **JavaScript Framework Integration**: Foundation for Apps integrates seamlessly with AngularJS, providing a robust and cohesive platform for building complex web applications, while UIkit offers more generic JavaScript functionality that can be used with a variety of frameworks.
   
3. **Customization and Overrides**: UIkit offers a more modular and customizable approach with a wide range of components and styles that can be easily overridden and extended, while Foundation for Apps provides a more opinionated structure that might be less flexible for unique design requirements.
   
4. **Responsive Design Philosophy**: UIkit follows a mobile-first approach with a focus on lightweight components optimized for performance on all devices, while Foundation for Apps offers a broader set of features catering to more complex desktop applications.
   
5. **Community and Support**: UIkit has a strong and active community with a wealth of resources, plugins, and themes available for easy integration, while Foundation for Apps, although well-supported by the ZURB team, may have a smaller community and fewer third-party resources.
   
6. **Documentation and Learning Curve**: UIkit is known for its comprehensive and beginner-friendly documentation, making it easier for developers to get started, while Foundation for Apps may have a steeper learning curve due to its more specialized features and concepts.

In Summary, Foundation for Apps and UIkit differ in their use of CSS Flexbox, JavaScript framework integration, customization options, responsive design philosophy, community support, and documentation approach. Each has its own strengths and considerations for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on UIkIt, Foundation for Apps

Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Sai Karun
Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

UIkIt
UIkIt
Foundation for Apps
Foundation for Apps

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Foundation for Apps is a framework you can use to build better, more polished single-page web applications that work across many devices. We’ve taken what we’ve learned from building the original Foundation framework to build an entirely new framework just for web apps.

LESS - UIkit is developed in LESS to write well-structured, extendable code which is easy to maintain.;Components - A collection of small, responsive components using consistent and conflict-free naming conventions.;Customizer - UIkit's very basic style can be extended with themes and is easy to customize to create your own look.;Responsive - With the mobile-first approach UIkit provides a consistent experience from phones and tablets to desktops.
Vertical Grid;Independent Scrolling Sections;Easier Source Ordering;Templatizing Angular;Component Driven;Add Motion to Views;Animation Classes;Motion Modifiers;Sass Mixins
Statistics
GitHub Stars
18.5K
GitHub Stars
1.6K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
215
Stacks
791
Stacks
31
Followers
417
Followers
42
Votes
262
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 39
    Complete GUI
  • 29
    Easy modify
  • 27
    Practical
  • 24
    Functional
  • 24
    Easy to learn
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to UIkIt, Foundation for Apps?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase