StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. FreeRADIUS vs sso

FreeRADIUS vs sso

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FreeRADIUS
FreeRADIUS
Stacks28
Followers36
Votes1
sso
sso
Stacks38
Followers89
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.1K
Forks191

FreeRADIUS vs sso: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of network and security management, FreeRADIUS and SSO (Single Sign-On) are two key technologies used for authentication and authorization purposes. Understanding the key differences between the two is crucial for implementing the right solution for your organization.

  1. Authentication method: FreeRADIUS is an open-source technology used primarily for network access control and AAA (Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting). It is widely used to authenticate users connecting to a network using various protocols such as EAP, PAP, and CHAP. On the other hand, SSO is a centralized authentication method that allows users to access multiple applications with a single set of credentials. It eliminates the need for users to enter multiple usernames and passwords for different applications.

  2. Scope of use: FreeRADIUS is typically used by network administrators and ISPs to control access to network resources, manage user accounts, and track usage statistics. It is commonly deployed in enterprise environments, universities, and internet service providers. In contrast, SSO is more focused on simplifying the user experience by providing seamless access to multiple applications within an organization. It is commonly used by businesses to streamline access to various web-based applications.

  3. Integration capabilities: FreeRADIUS can be integrated with various backend systems such as LDAP, Active Directory, SQL databases, and external scripts to authenticate users and enforce access policies. It offers extensive customization options for administrators to tailor the authentication process to their specific requirements. On the other hand, SSO solutions are designed to integrate with a wide range of applications and services, allowing users to access them seamlessly without the need for multiple logins. SSO often uses protocols like SAML and OAuth for integration.

  4. Security features: FreeRADIUS provides robust security features such as support for strong encryption protocols, certificate-based authentication, and dynamic VLAN assignment to enhance network security. It offers mechanisms to detect and prevent unauthorized access to network resources, ensuring data protection and privacy. SSO solutions also prioritize security by implementing secure authentication methods, multi-factor authentication, and session management techniques to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

  5. User experience: FreeRADIUS mainly focuses on backend authentication processes and network access control, with minimal emphasis on user interface design and customization. It is primarily managed by network administrators and IT professionals. In contrast, SSO solutions prioritize user experience by providing a seamless login experience across multiple applications, improving productivity, and reducing user frustration. SSO often offers customization options for organizations to brand their login pages and personalize the user experience.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between FreeRADIUS and SSO is essential for organizations to choose the right authentication and authorization solution based on their specific requirements, security needs, and user experience goals.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FreeRADIUS
FreeRADIUS
sso
sso

It is the open source implementation of RADIUS, an IETF protocol for AAA (Authorisation, Authentication, and Accounting).. It is responsible for authenticating one third of all users on the Internet.

The authentication and authorization system BuzzFeed developed to provide a secure, single sign-on experience for access to the many internal web apps used by our employees.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
191
Stacks
28
Stacks
38
Followers
36
Followers
89
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Very Lightweight
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
MySQL
MySQL
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to FreeRADIUS , sso?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope