Galen vs Optic

Overview

Galen

Stacks11

Followers14

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.4K

Forks163

Optic

Stacks4

Followers6

Votes8

GitHub Stars1.5K

Forks90

Optic vs Galen: What are the differences?

Optic: Automate routine programming. ; Galen: Automated testing of responsive design and html layout for web applications. It is a tool for testing layout of responsive web apps. It is based on Selenium and has a special language for testing page layout.

Optic can be classified as a tool in the "Code Automation Tools" category, while Galen is grouped under "Browser Testing".

Some of the features offered by Optic are:

Optic understands your code - Advanced pattern matching lets Optic recognize and document many types of code.
Smart code generation - Functional Boilerplate derived from the code in your project.
Auto-Update - Combined, Optic's ability to read and generate code helps keep interconnected code in sync. Pull requests are created to propagate changes throughout all your repos.

On the other hand, Galen provides the following key features:

Responsive
Cross-browser layout testing
Functional testing

Optic and Galen are both open source tools. It seems that Galen with 1.33K GitHub stars and 143 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Optic with 169 GitHub stars and 7 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

or

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Galen	Optic
It is a tool for testing layout of responsive web apps. It is based on Selenium and has a special language for testing page layout	Optic is an open-source tool that automatically documents and tests your API. It makes it easy to keep your API specification and code in sync and automates your contract testing.
Responsive; Cross-browser layout testing; Functional testing	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.4K	GitHub Stars 1.5K
GitHub Forks 163	GitHub Forks 90
Stacks 11	Stacks 4
Followers 14	Followers 6
Votes 0	Votes 8
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 2 Automated API Documentation 2 Import / Export OpenAPI 2 API Versioning 2 Test
Integrations
BrowserStack Java Selenium C#	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Galen, Optic?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Telosys

It is an Open Source code generator. It generates the plumbing and repetitive code for any kind of language. It has been designed to be light and very simple to use.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.