1. Authentication Process: Gazepass offers a seamless authentication process using eye-tracking technology, while Keycloak provides traditional username and password authentication methods.
2. Security Features: Gazepass focuses on biometric authentication, ensuring higher security levels, whereas Keycloak emphasizes role-based access control and multifactor authentication for security measures.
3. Integration Capabilities: Keycloak offers extensive integration options with various platforms and systems, while Gazepass may have limited integration capabilities due to its specialized eye-tracking technology.
4. User Experience: Gazepass provides a unique user experience with its biometric authentication, potentially enhancing convenience for users, whereas Keycloak relies on established methods that may be more familiar to users.
5. Scalability: Keycloak is known for its scalability, supporting large user bases and complex systems, while Gazepass may have limitations in scalability due to the specialized nature of its technology.
6. Cost Considerations: While Keycloak is an open-source platform with no direct costs for the software itself, Gazepass may involve additional costs for the hardware and technology required for its eye-tracking authentication system.

In Summary, Gazepass and Keycloak differ in authentication process, security features, integration capabilities, user experience, scalability, and cost considerations.