StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Gazepass vs Spring Security

Gazepass vs Spring Security

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks559
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K
Gazepass
Gazepass
Stacks0
Followers5
Votes0

Gazepass vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Authentication Methods: Gazepass provides multi-factor authentication including biometrics, eye tracking, and facial recognition, whereas Spring Security primarily focuses on traditional methods like username/password, OAuth, and LDAP for authentication.

  2. Scope of Protection: Gazepass offers advanced security features such as continuous biometric authentication and behavior analytics to detect suspicious activities, while Spring Security focuses more on providing essential security mechanisms like authentication, authorization, and encryption.

  3. Ease of Integration: Gazepass offers SDKs for easy integration with various platforms and applications, whereas Spring Security is specifically designed for Java applications and might require more effort to integrate with other programming languages or frameworks.

  4. Adaptive Authentication: Gazepass utilizes biometric authentication and behavioral biometrics for adaptive authentication, enabling dynamic risk assessments and heightened security levels based on user behavior. In contrast, Spring Security lacks advanced adaptive authentication features and relies more on traditional authentication methods.

  5. Continuous Monitoring: Gazepass includes real-time monitoring capabilities to detect and respond to security threats instantly, while Spring Security focuses on setting up security rules and policies to prevent security breaches but may not provide real-time monitoring capabilities.

  6. Platform Compatibility: Gazepass is compatible with various platforms, including web, mobile, and IoT devices, offering a consistent security experience across different environments. Spring Security, on the other hand, is primarily tailored for Java-based web applications, limiting its compatibility with other types of platforms.

In Summary, Gazepass stands out for its advanced biometric authentication methods and continuous monitoring capabilities, making it a comprehensive security solution for various platforms, while Spring Security provides essential security features for Java applications with a focus on traditional authentication methods.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spring Security
Spring Security
Gazepass
Gazepass

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

It lets you enable passwordless login on your web & mobile apps with just a few lines of code — your users will be able to sign up with Google/email and login using native biometric sensors or face ID via webcam.

Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
Passwordless, everywhere; React App Integration; Website Integration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
559
Stacks
0
Followers
589
Followers
5
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Java integration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC
React
React

What are some alternatives to Spring Security, Gazepass?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope