StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs SonarLint

Gerrit Code Review vs SonarLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67
SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16

Gerrit Code Review vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of code review and analysis tools, Gerrit Code Review and SonarLint serve different purposes and offer distinct features for developers.

  1. Integration with IDEs: SonarLint is primarily an IDE plugin that provides on-the-fly feedback to developers during code editing, while Gerrit Code Review operates as a web-based code collaboration tool for reviewing commits prior to merging.

  2. Focus on Static Code Analysis: SonarLint is specifically designed for static code analysis, enabling developers to detect code quality issues, security vulnerabilities, and bugs in real-time within their IDE, whereas Gerrit Code Review focuses on the process of reviewing and approving code changes through a structured workflow.

  3. Support for Multiple Programming Languages: SonarLint supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks for code analysis, making it versatile for various development environments, whereas Gerrit Code Review's capabilities are more centered around Git repositories and version control systems.

  4. Automated Code Quality Checks: SonarLint automates the process of scanning code for quality issues and providing instant feedback to developers as they write code, whereas Gerrit Code Review relies on manual code reviews by peers or team members to assess and approve code changes.

  5. Repository Management and Workflow: Gerrit Code Review offers features for managing repositories, branches, and access control settings to streamline the code review process within a collaborative team environment, while SonarLint focuses on individual developers improving code quality within their IDE.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review and SonarLint differ in their integration with IDEs, focus on static code analysis, support for multiple programming languages, automated code quality checks, and repository management workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
SonarLint
SonarLint

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
Stacks
116
Stacks
175
Followers
223
Followers
352
Votes
67
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Open source
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
Integrations
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to Gerrit Code Review, SonarLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana