StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Ghost vs Statamic

Ghost vs Statamic

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ghost
Ghost
Stacks518
Followers506
Votes219
GitHub Stars51.1K
Forks11.1K
Statamic
Statamic
Stacks59
Followers114
Votes28

Ghost vs Statamic: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of content management systems, two popular options are Ghost and Statamic. While both are designed to help users manage and create content for their websites, they have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Cost: Ghost is a paid platform that offers different pricing tiers based on the user's needs, ranging from personal blogs to business websites. In contrast, Statamic uses a one-time payment model, allowing users to purchase the software once and use it indefinitely without any ongoing subscription fees.

  2. Technology Stack: Ghost is built on Node.js, which makes it fast and efficient for handling large volumes of content. On the other hand, Statamic is based on PHP and Laravel, offering a familiar environment for users who are comfortable with these technologies.

  3. Flexibility and Customization: Statamic provides a more flexible and customizable experience for users, allowing them to create tailored solutions for their specific needs. Ghost, while user-friendly, may be more restrictive in terms of customization options due to its focus on simplicity and ease of use.

  4. Content Structure: Ghost follows a more traditional content structure with posts, tags, and authors, making it ideal for blogs and news websites. In contrast, Statamic uses a file-based system that allows for more granular control over content, making it suitable for complex website structures like e-commerce sites.

  5. Community and Support: Ghost has a larger community of users and developers, providing a wealth of resources and plugins to enhance the platform. Statamic, while having a smaller community, offers dedicated support and regular updates to ensure users have a smooth experience with the software.

Summary

In summary, Ghost and Statamic differ in terms of cost, technology stack, flexibility, content structure, and community support, catering to users with distinct needs and preferences in content management systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ghost, Statamic

Xander
Xander

Founder at Rate My Meeting

Mar 30, 2020

Decided

So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.

243k views243k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ghost
Ghost
Statamic
Statamic

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

The open source, developer & designer-first, Laravel + Git powered CMS built to make managing websites easy with Git.

An intuitive, minimal editor; Ultra-fast content management; All SEO features built-in natively; Native desktop & mobile apps; Publish once, distribute everywhere; Headless CMS with Node.js REST APIs; Over 19x faster than WordPress; Secure & independently audited; Custom theme or any JAMstack front-end
Bring Your Own HTML; Drag & Drop Nav Builder; GraphQL; REST API; CLI Tools; Powered by Laravel; Real Time Collaboration; Revisions; Live Preview; Static Site Generator; Asset Manager; Block-Based Editing; Global Data; Image Editing; Multi-Site; Multi-Lingual; Form Management; Users; White Labeling; Addons; OAuth; SEO One-Click Updater; 40+ Custom Fieldtypes
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
11.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
518
Stacks
59
Followers
506
Followers
114
Votes
219
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Beautiful
  • 35
    Fast
  • 29
    Quick/simple post styling
  • 20
    Open source
  • 20
    Live Post Preview
Pros
  • 6
    Version control your content
  • 6
    No database
  • 4
    Surprising flexibility
  • 4
    It is based on Laravel
  • 3
    Easy templating
Cons
  • 2
    Not user friendly
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to Ghost, Statamic?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack