StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Ghost vs Webiny Headless CMS

Ghost vs Webiny Headless CMS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ghost
Ghost
Stacks518
Followers506
Votes219
GitHub Stars51.1K
Forks11.1K
Webiny Headless CMS
Webiny Headless CMS
Stacks11
Followers39
Votes19
GitHub Stars7.9K
Forks660

Ghost vs Webiny Headless CMS: What are the differences?

Introduction: Ghost and Webiny are popular Headless CMS platforms that offer unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these two platforms can help users make an informed decision about which CMS to choose for their projects.

  1. Architecture: Ghost is a single-tenant SaaS solution, which means each user gets their own dedicated instance of the platform. On the other hand, Webiny is open-source and self-hosted, giving users more control over their environment and data.

  2. Focus on content editing: Ghost primarily focuses on providing a seamless and user-friendly content editing experience for writers and creators. In comparison, Webiny offers a more comprehensive suite of tools for building and managing complete web applications, beyond just content creation.

  3. Customization options: Webiny offers a greater level of customization and extensibility compared to Ghost. Users can leverage Webiny's serverless architecture to build custom plugins, integrations, and workflows tailored to their specific needs.

  4. Scalability: Ghost is designed for smaller to medium-sized websites and may not scale well for large, enterprise-level projects. Webiny, with its self-hosted and scalable architecture, provides better scalability options for projects that need to handle heavy traffic loads and complex distribution requirements.

  5. Community support: Webiny, being open-source, has a larger and more active community compared to Ghost. This translates to more resources, tutorials, and support options for Webiny users looking to troubleshoot issues or expand their platform's capabilities.

  6. Cost: While both Ghost and Webiny offer free and paid plans, the overall cost of ownership may differ based on factors such as hosting requirements, customizations, and development support. Users should consider their budget constraints and long-term needs when evaluating the cost implications of each platform.

In summary, understanding the architectural differences, focus on content editing, customization options, scalability, community support, and cost implications can help users differentiate between Ghost and Webiny Headless CMS platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ghost, Webiny Headless CMS

Xander
Xander

Founder at Rate My Meeting

Mar 30, 2020

Decided

So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.

243k views243k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ghost
Ghost
Webiny Headless CMS
Webiny Headless CMS

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

A big chunk of your server resources aren't utilized. With Webiny adopt serverless and save 60-80% on your cloud hosting bill and on infrastructure operations costs. Forget worrying about flash crowds and uptime.

An intuitive, minimal editor; Ultra-fast content management; All SEO features built-in natively; Native desktop & mobile apps; Publish once, distribute everywhere; Headless CMS with Node.js REST APIs; Over 19x faster than WordPress; Secure & independently audited; Custom theme or any JAMstack front-end
Powerful content modelling UI; GraphQL API; Multi-language support; 100% Javascript; Microservices architecture; Support for multiple environments and aliases
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.1K
GitHub Stars
7.9K
GitHub Forks
11.1K
GitHub Forks
660
Stacks
518
Stacks
11
Followers
506
Followers
39
Votes
219
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Beautiful
  • 35
    Fast
  • 29
    Quick/simple post styling
  • 20
    Live Post Preview
  • 20
    Open source
Pros
  • 4
    Self Hosted
  • 3
    Open source
  • 3
    Serverless
  • 3
    Rapid Development
  • 2
    Api based cms
Integrations
No integrations available
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas
GraphQL
GraphQL
Swift
Swift
Next.js
Next.js
Gatsby
Gatsby

What are some alternatives to Ghost, Webiny Headless CMS?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack