Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Gitblit

Stacks18

Followers55

Votes4

GitLab vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitLab and Gitblit are both software development platforms that provide version control system capabilities. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between them. In this Markdown document, we will outline six of the main distinctions between GitLab and Gitblit.

Hosting Options: GitLab offers both a cloud-based version (GitLab.com) and a self-hosted version (GitLab CE/EE), giving users the flexibility to choose between a managed service or hosting it on their own infrastructure. On the other hand, Gitblit is primarily designed as a self-hosted solution, which means users have to set up and manage their own Gitblit instance.
User Interface: GitLab provides a more modern and visually appealing user interface, making it more user-friendly and intuitive. It offers a wide range of features accessible through its interface, such as issue tracking, code review, and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. Gitblit, on the other hand, has a simpler interface that focuses primarily on providing the core functionality of version control.
Integration with External Tools: GitLab has a strong focus on integration and offers seamless connections with various external tools and platforms, such as issue trackers, project management tools, and third-party services. It provides extensive APIs and webhooks to facilitate integration with other systems. Gitblit, while it does support some integrations, may not have the same level of flexibility and breadth of integrations as GitLab.
Built-in CI/CD: GitLab has an integrated CI/CD system, referred to as GitLab CI/CD, which enables users to automate their software delivery pipelines. It provides powerful features such as parallel execution, detailed job logs, and integration with container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. Gitblit, on the other hand, does not have built-in CI/CD capabilities and requires users to set up separate tools for implementing continuous integration and deployment.
Community and Support: GitLab has a large and active user community, making it easier to find online resources, documentation, and community-driven support. It also benefits from the contributions of its open-source community, leading to frequent updates and improvements. Gitblit, while it does have a user community, may not have the same level of community support and resources as GitLab.
Pricing Model: GitLab offers both a free community edition (GitLab CE) and a paid enterprise edition (GitLab EE) with additional features and support. The enterprise edition is available as a subscription-based licensing model. Gitblit, on the other hand, is an open-source project and is free to use without any licensing costs.

In summary, GitLab provides a more versatile hosting solution with options for both cloud-based and self-hosted instances, a modern user interface with extensive features, and robust integration capabilities. It also offers a built-in CI/CD system and benefits from a large user community. On the other hand, Gitblit is primarily focused on self-hosted instances, has a simpler interface, offers fewer integration options, lacks built-in CI/CD capabilities, and may have a smaller support community.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on GitLab, Gitblit

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Gitblit
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	Gitblit is an open source, pure Java Git solution for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories. It can serve repositories over the GIT, HTTP, and SSH transports; it can authenticate against multiple providers; and it allows you to get up-and-running with an attractive, capable Git server in less than 5 minutes.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 18
Followers 54.5K	Followers 55
Votes 2.5K	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 1 Easy to setup. Runs on OSX 1 Better user & group management 1 Free 1 Fast and fulfill just the features I need 0 Windows authentication is supported Cons 2 Confusing UI 0 Squash and Merge is not supported 0 No active development 0 No code review functionality 0 No Pull Requests
Integrations
No integrations available	Git

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Gitblit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.