StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Static Web Hosting
  5. GitHub Pages vs Webflow

GitHub Pages vs Webflow

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webflow
Webflow
Stacks806
Followers839
Votes52
GitHub Pages
GitHub Pages
Stacks17.7K
Followers13.0K
Votes1.1K

GitHub Pages vs Webflow: What are the differences?

<GitHub Pages and Webflow are both popular platforms used for hosting websites, but they have key differences that cater to different needs. Below are the main distinctions between GitHub Pages and Webflow.>

  1. Hosting Environment: GitHub Pages allows users to host static websites directly from GitHub repositories, making it ideal for simple and small projects where coding skills are required. On the other hand, Webflow offers a visual web design tool that allows users to create complex, dynamic websites without the need for coding knowledge.

  2. Customization Options: Webflow provides a wide range of design customization options, including the ability to create unique animations and interactions. GitHub Pages, while customizable to some extent, is more limited in terms of design flexibility compared to Webflow.

  3. Cost: GitHub Pages is free for public repositories, making it a cost-effective option for hosting open-source projects. Webflow, however, offers various pricing plans based on the level of functionality and hosting needs, making it a better choice for businesses and professionals who require more advanced features.

  4. Collaboration Tools: GitHub Pages is integrated with GitHub, which enables easy collaboration among team members through version control and pull requests. Webflow, on the other hand, offers in-built collaboration tools such as real-time editing and commenting for team members to work together on website projects.

  5. E-commerce Functionality: Webflow provides out-of-the-box e-commerce functionality, allowing users to set up online stores and manage products seamlessly. GitHub Pages does not natively support e-commerce features, making it less suitable for users looking to create online stores.

  6. SEO Capabilities: Webflow offers advanced SEO capabilities, including custom meta tags and automatic XML sitemap generation, to help improve a website's search engine visibility. While GitHub Pages allows basic SEO optimizations, it may not offer the same level of control and customization as Webflow in this aspect.

In Summary, GitHub Pages is suitable for static websites with coding requirements and collaboration needs, while Webflow is better suited for visually rich, dynamic websites with advanced customization and e-commerce functionality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webflow, GitHub Pages

Howie
Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

DecidedonNetlifyNetlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webflow
Webflow
GitHub Pages
GitHub Pages

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

Build responsive websites;PIxel perfect control;Publish and host in minutes
Blogging with Jekyll; Custom URLs; Automatic Page Generator
Statistics
Stacks
806
Stacks
17.7K
Followers
839
Followers
13.0K
Votes
52
Votes
1.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Interactions and Animations
  • 7
    Builds clean code in the background
  • 7
    Fast development of html and css layouts/design
  • 6
    Free plan
  • 6
    Fully Customizable
Cons
  • 1
    No Audio Support
  • 1
    Freemium
Pros
  • 290
    Free
  • 217
    Right out of github
  • 185
    Quick to set up
  • 108
    Instant
  • 107
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 4
    Not possible to perform HTTP redirects
  • 3
    Supports only Jekyll
  • 3
    Limited Jekyll plugins
  • 1
    Jekyll is bloated
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Webflow, GitHub Pages?

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

GitLab Pages

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Firebase Hosting

Firebase Hosting

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

Runkod

Runkod

It provides decentralized hosting platform and management tools for modern javascript applications and static web publishing.

BitBalloon

BitBalloon

BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.

Spigot

Spigot

It is home to the community behind the biggest Minecraft server software projects and provides a place for everyone involved with Minecraft servers to connect with each other whether they seeking help and support or sharing and showcasing their work. We provide a web forum, chat room and wiki for providing support as well as project hosting for content creators and hope that you too will become involved in this extensive and growing community of more than 300,000 members.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope