Alternatives to GraphicsMagick logo

Alternatives to GraphicsMagick

ImageMagick, OpenCV, Cloudinary, Pillow, and FFMPEG are the most popular alternatives and competitors to GraphicsMagick.
24
64
+ 1
4

What is GraphicsMagick and what are its top alternatives?

GraphicsMagick is a powerful and flexible open-source image processing framework that offers a wide range of functionalities for creating, editing, and manipulating images. It supports over 88 major formats including JPEG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, SVG, and more. However, GraphicsMagick can be complex for beginners and may have a steeper learning curve compared to other image processing tools.

  1. ImageMagick: ImageMagick is a popular and highly versatile open-source image processing software that allows users to create, edit, compose, or convert bitmap images. It supports a wide range of image formats and provides an extensive set of features for image manipulation. However, it can be resource-intensive for large-scale image processing tasks.
  2. OpenCV: OpenCV is an open-source computer vision and machine learning software library that offers various image processing functions. It is widely used in applications for image analysis, object detection, video processing, and more. OpenCV is known for its speed and efficiency in handling complex image processing tasks but may have a steeper learning curve compared to other tools.
  3. GIMP: GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program) is a free and open-source raster graphics editor used for tasks such as photo retouching, image composition, and image authoring. It offers a wide range of tools and features for image editing and manipulation. However, GIMP may not be suitable for batch processing large numbers of images.
  4. FastStone Image Viewer: FastStone Image Viewer is a fast, stable, and user-friendly image browser, converter, and editor that supports all major graphic formats. It offers basic editing features and batch processing capabilities, making it a versatile tool for handling images. However, it may lack advanced image processing functionalities compared to GraphicsMagick.
  5. Paint.NET: Paint.NET is a free image editing software with an intuitive user interface and a wide variety of features for editing photos and creating artwork. It offers support for layers, special effects, and a range of tools for image manipulation. However, it may not be as powerful as GraphicsMagick for complex image processing tasks.
  6. XnView: XnView is a fast and efficient image viewer, browser, and converter that supports over 500 image formats. It offers batch processing capabilities and basic editing tools for image manipulation. However, it may lack advanced features compared to GraphicsMagick for in-depth image processing tasks.
  7. Photoshop: Adobe Photoshop is a powerful and industry-standard image editing software used for tasks such as photo editing, graphic design, and digital art creation. It offers advanced features and tools for image manipulation but may have a steep learning curve and be resource-intensive for some users.
  8. CorelDRAW: CorelDRAW is a vector graphics editor that offers a wide range of tools for illustration, layout, photo editing, and typography. It is known for its versatility and comprehensive set of features for graphic design but may not be as specialized for image processing tasks as GraphicsMagick.
  9. Affinity Photo: Affinity Photo is a professional image editing software with a wide range of tools and features for retouching, editing, and manipulating photos. It offers advanced capabilities for image processing and design tasks, making it a strong alternative to GraphicsMagick for professional users.
  10. Inkscape: Inkscape is a free and open-source vector graphics editor that provides a wide range of tools for creating and editing vector graphics and illustrations. It offers support for scalable vector graphics (SVG) format and various design features but may not have the same level of image processing capabilities as GraphicsMagick.

Top Alternatives to GraphicsMagick

  • ImageMagick
    ImageMagick

    It is a free and open-source software suite for displaying, converting, and editing raster image and vector image files. It can read and write images in a variety of formats (over 200) including PNG, JPEG, GIF, HEIC, TIFF, DPX, EXR, WebP, Postscript, PDF, and SVG. ...

  • OpenCV
    OpenCV

    OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform. ...

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • Pillow
    Pillow

    It adds image processing capabilities to your Python interpreter. It provides extensive file format support, an efficient internal representation, and fairly powerful image processing capabilities. ...

  • FFMPEG
    FFMPEG

    The universal multimedia toolkit.

  • scikit-image
    scikit-image

    scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

  • imgix
    imgix

    imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters. ...

  • GStreamer
    GStreamer

    It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing. ...

GraphicsMagick alternatives & related posts

ImageMagick logo

ImageMagick

81
92
0
A software suite to create, edit, compose, or convert bitmap images
81
92
+ 1
0
PROS OF IMAGEMAGICK
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF IMAGEMAGICK
      Be the first to leave a con

      related ImageMagick posts

      OpenCV logo

      OpenCV

      1.2K
      1K
      97
      Open Source Computer Vision Library
      1.2K
      1K
      + 1
      97
      PROS OF OPENCV
      • 36
        Computer Vision
      • 17
        Open Source
      • 12
        Imaging
      • 9
        Face Detection
      • 9
        Machine Learning
      • 6
        Great community
      • 4
        Realtime Image Processing
      • 2
        Helping almost CV problem
      • 2
        Image Augmentation
      CONS OF OPENCV
        Be the first to leave a con

        related OpenCV posts

        Shared insights
        on
        FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

        Hi Team,

        Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

        Thank you in Advance.

        See more
        Cloudinary logo

        Cloudinary

        576
        590
        179
        An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
        576
        590
        + 1
        179
        PROS OF CLOUDINARY
        • 37
          Easy setup
        • 31
          Fast image delivery
        • 26
          Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
        • 21
          Free tier
        • 11
          Heroku add-on
        • 9
          Reduce development costs
        • 7
          Amazing support
        • 6
          Heroku plugin
        • 6
          Great libraries for all languages
        • 6
          Virtually limitless scale
        • 5
          Easy to integrate with Rails
        • 4
          Cheap
        • 3
          Shot setup time
        • 3
          Very easy setup
        • 2
          Solves alot of image problems.
        • 1
          Best in the market and includes free plan
        • 1
          Extremely generous free pricing tier
        • 0
          Fast image delivery, vast array
        CONS OF CLOUDINARY
        • 5
          Paid plan is expensive

        related Cloudinary posts

        Pillow logo

        Pillow

        462
        4
        0
        Python Imaging Library
        462
        4
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF PILLOW
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF PILLOW
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Pillow posts

            FFMPEG logo

            FFMPEG

            363
            249
            5
            The universal multimedia toolkit.
            363
            249
            + 1
            5
            PROS OF FFMPEG
            • 5
              Open Source
            CONS OF FFMPEG
              Be the first to leave a con

              related FFMPEG posts

              Shared insights
              on
              FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

              Hi Team,

              Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

              Thank you in Advance.

              See more
              Shared insights
              on
              GStreamerGStreamerFFMPEGFFMPEG

              I have a situation to convert the H264 streams into MP4 format using FFMPEG/GStreamer.

              However Im stuck with the gst-ugly plugin, now trying my luck with ffmeg. How big are the ffmeg libs and licensing complications?

              See more
              scikit-image logo

              scikit-image

              250
              127
              11
              Image processing in Python
              250
              127
              + 1
              11
              PROS OF SCIKIT-IMAGE
              • 6
                More powerful
              • 4
                Anaconda compatibility
              • 1
                Great documentation
              CONS OF SCIKIT-IMAGE
                Be the first to leave a con

                related scikit-image posts

                imgix logo

                imgix

                215
                318
                176
                Optimize, manage, and deliver images and videos for faster pages, better visual quality, and a simpler workflow.
                215
                318
                + 1
                176
                PROS OF IMGIX
                • 28
                  Image processing on demand
                • 24
                  Easy setup
                • 18
                  Smart Cropping
                • 18
                  Reduce Development Costs
                • 15
                  Efficient
                • 12
                  Insanely Fast
                • 11
                  Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
                • 10
                  Easy to understand pricing
                • 9
                  Professional Features and Options
                • 6
                  Lightyears better than ImageMagick
                • 6
                  Excellent Face Detection
                • 5
                  S3 as source
                • 4
                  Scales to your company's needs
                • 4
                  Great for Dynamic Compositing
                • 1
                  Video encoding
                • 1
                  Fast Image Delivery
                • 1
                  Free tier
                • 1
                  Amazing support
                • 1
                  Great libraries and integrations
                • 1
                  Automatic scrset generation
                CONS OF IMGIX
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related imgix posts

                  Mountain/ \Ash

                  Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

                  See more
                  Mountain/ \Ash

                  In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

                  See more
                  GStreamer logo

                  GStreamer

                  47
                  80
                  4
                  Open source multimedia framework
                  47
                  80
                  + 1
                  4
                  PROS OF GSTREAMER
                  • 2
                    Ease of use
                  • 1
                    Cross Platform
                  • 1
                    Open Source
                  CONS OF GSTREAMER
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related GStreamer posts

                    Shared insights
                    on
                    GStreamerGStreamerFFMPEGFFMPEG

                    I have a situation to convert the H264 streams into MP4 format using FFMPEG/GStreamer.

                    However Im stuck with the gst-ugly plugin, now trying my luck with ffmeg. How big are the ffmeg libs and licensing complications?

                    See more