Alternatives to Gridsome logo

Alternatives to Gridsome

Nuxt.js, VuePress, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Gridsome.
144
283
+ 1
50

What is Gridsome and what are its top alternatives?

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.
Gridsome is a tool in the Static Site Generators category of a tech stack.
Gridsome is an open source tool with 8.3K GitHub stars and 499 GitHub forks. Here鈥檚 a link to Gridsome's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Gridsome

  • Nuxt.js
    Nuxt.js

    Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more. ...

  • VuePress
    VuePress

    A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects. ...

  • Hugo
    Hugo

    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data. ...

  • Gatsby
    Gatsby

    Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future. ...

  • Jekyll
    Jekyll

    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories. ...

  • Hexo
    Hexo

    Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds. ...

  • Middleman
    Middleman

    Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment. ...

  • MkDocs
    MkDocs

    It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes. ...

Gridsome alternatives & related posts

Nuxt.js logo

Nuxt.js

1.6K
1.4K
302
The Vue.js Framework
1.6K
1.4K
+ 1
302
PROS OF NUXT.JS
  • 53
    SSR
  • 43
    Automatic routes
  • 28
    Middleware
  • 24
    Hot code reloading
  • 19
    Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH
  • 17
    Static Websites
  • 17
    SPA
  • 16
    Plugins
  • 16
    Code splitting for every page
  • 14
    Custom layouts
  • 12
    Automatic transpilation and bundling (with webpack and
  • 10
    Modules ecosystem
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Amazing Developer Experience
  • 7
    Vibrant and helpful community
  • 7
    Pages directory
  • 2
    Its Great for Team Development
CONS OF NUXT.JS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Nuxt.js posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH | 22 upvotes 路 1.4M views

    Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

    • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
    • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
    • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
    • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
    • Jest as testing framework
    • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
    • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

    The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

    • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
    • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
    • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
    • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
    • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
    • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
    See more
    Giordanna De Gregoriis
    Jr Fullstack Developer at Stefanini Inspiring | 8 upvotes 路 205.8K views

    TL;DR: Shall I keep developing with Nuxt.js 2 and wait for a migration guide to Nuxt 3? Or start developing with Vue.js 3 using Vite, and then migrate to Nuxt 3 when it comes out?

    Long version: We have an old web application running on AngularJS and Bootstrap for frontend. It is mostly a user interface to easily read and post data to our engine.

    We want to redo this web application. Started from scratch using the newest version of Angular 2+ and Material Design for frontend. We haven't even finished rewriting half of the application and it is becoming dreadful to work on.

    • The cold start takes too much time
    • Every little change reload the whole page. Seconds to minutes of development lost looking at a loading blank page just changing css
    • Code maintainability is getting worse... again... as the application grows, since we must create everytime 5 files for a new page (html, component.ts, module.ts, scss, routing.ts)

    I'm currently trying to code a Proof of Concept using Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS. But the thing is, Vue.js 3 is out and has interesting features such as the composition API, teleport and fragments. Also we wish to use the Vite frontend tooling, to improve our time developing regardless of our application size. It feels like a better alternative to Webpack, which is what Nuxt 2 uses.

    I'm already trying Nuxt.js with the nuxt-vite experimental module, but many nuxt modules are still incompatible from the time I'm posting this. It is also becoming cumbersome not being able to use teleport or fragments, but that can be circumvented with good components.

    What I'm asking is, what should be the wisest decision: keep developing with Nuxt 2 and wait for a migration guide to Nuxt 3? Or start developing with Vue.js 3 using Vite, and then migrate to Nuxt 3 when it comes out?

    See more
    VuePress logo

    VuePress

    269
    398
    8
    A static-site generator built by the Vue.js team
    269
    398
    + 1
    8
    PROS OF VUEPRESS
    • 4
      It's Vue
    • 2
      Created by the vue.js developers
    • 2
      Built in text search feature
    CONS OF VUEPRESS
    • 3
      Its Vue

    related VuePress posts

    Nikolaj Ivancic

    I want to build a documentation tool - functionally equivalent to MkDocs. The initial choice ought to be VuePress - but I know of at least one respectable developer who started with VuePress and switched to Nuxt.js. A rich set of "themes" is a plus and all documents ought to be in Markdown.

    Any opinions?

    See more
    Hugo logo

    Hugo

    1.1K
    1.1K
    205
    A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator written in Go
    1.1K
    1.1K
    + 1
    205
    PROS OF HUGO
    • 47
      Lightning fast
    • 29
      Single Executable
    • 26
      Easy setup
    • 24
      Great development community
    • 23
      Open source
    • 13
      Write in golang
    • 8
      Hacker mindset
    • 7
      Not HTML only - JSON, RSS
    • 7
      LiveReload built in
    • 4
      Very fast builds
    • 4
      Gitlab pages integration
    • 4
      Easy to customize themes
    • 3
      Easy to learn
    • 3
      Fast builds
    • 3
      Well documented
    CONS OF HUGO
    • 4
      No Plugins/Extensions
    • 2
      Template syntax not friendly
    • 1
      Quick builds

    related Hugo posts

    John-Daniel Trask
    Co-founder & CEO at Raygun | 19 upvotes 路 239.7K views
    Shared insights
    on
    .NET.NETWordPressWordPressHugoHugo
    at

    There鈥檚 no doubt WordPress is a great CMS, which is very user friendly. When we started the company, our blog wasn鈥檛 really our top priority, and it ended up being hosted on a fairly obscure server within our setup, which didn鈥檛 really change much until recently when things become harder to manage and make significant updates.

    As our marketing team increased, the amount of traffic that found us through our content marketing increased. We found ourselves struggling to maintain our Wordpress install given the amount of theme updates, plugins and security patches needing to be applied. Our biggest driver to find an alternative solution however was just how slow Wordpress is at serving content to the end user. I know there will be die hard fans out there with ways to set things up that mean WordPress sites can load quickly, but we needed something a lot more streamlined.

    We could see in our own Real User Monitoring tool that many users were experiencing page load speeds of over five seconds, even longer in worst case scenarios. Hugo is an open source static site generator that has enabled us to reduce load times by over 500% and make our blog far more maintainable across the whole team.

    The Raygun marketing site runs on a .NET CMS called N2 but we plan to swap that out with Hugo as well in future.

    #StaticSiteGenerators #SelfHostedBloggingCms #SupportSalesAndMarketing

    See more
    Josh Dzielak
    Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit | 5 upvotes 路 349.8K views
    Shared insights
    on
    JekyllJekyllHugoHugo

    Earlier this year, I migrated my personal website (dzello.com) from Jekyll to Hugo. My goal with the migration was to make the development environment as pleasant as possible and to make it really easy to add new types of content. For example, I knew I wanted to add a consulting page and some portfolio-style pages to show off talks I had given and projects I had worked on.

    I had heard about how fast Hugo was, so I tried it out with my content after using a simple migration tool. The results were impressive - the startup and rebuild times were in milliseconds, making the process of iterating on content or design less cumbersome. Then I started to see how I could use Hugo to create new page types and was very impressed by the flexibility of the content model. It took me a few days to really understand where content should go with Hugo, but then I felt very confident that I could create many different types of pages - even multiple blogs if I wanted - using a consistent syntax and with full control of the layouts and the URLs.

    After about 6 months, I've been very happy with the results of the migration. The dev environment is light and fast and I feel at ease adding new pages and sections to the site.

    See more
    Gatsby logo

    Gatsby

    2.8K
    2.2K
    111
    Free, open source framework for building blazing fast websites and apps with React
    2.8K
    2.2K
    + 1
    111
    PROS OF GATSBY
    • 24
      Generated websites are super fast
    • 15
      Fast
    • 14
      GraphQL
    • 9
      Progressive Web Apps generation
    • 8
      Reusable components (React)
    • 8
      Easy to connect with lots of CMS via official plugins
    • 7
      Allows to use markdown files as articles
    • 5
      Static-sites
    • 5
      Images
    • 4
      List of starters as base for new project
    • 4
      All the benefits of a static website + React+GraphQL
    • 3
      Easy to connect with Drupal via official plugin
    • 3
      Open source
    • 1
      Gitlab pages integration
    • 1
      Incremental Build
    CONS OF GATSBY
    • 6
      No ssr
    • 3
      Very slow builds
    • 3
      Documentation isn't complete.
    • 2
      For-profit
    • 2
      Slow builds
    • 2
      Flash of unstyled content issues
    • 1
      Problematic between develop and build commands
    • 1
      Difficult debugging
    • 1
      Too many dependencies
    • 1
      Plugin driven development
    • 1
      Difficult maintenance

    related Gatsby posts

    Johnny Bell

    I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

    I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

    I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

    Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

    Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

    With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

    If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

    See more
    Ronan Levesque
    Software engineer at Algolia | 18 upvotes 路 273.5K views

    A few months ago we decided to move our whole static website (www.algolia.com) to a new stack. At the time we were using a website generator called Middleman, written in Ruby. As a team of only front-end developers we didn't feel very comfortable with the language itself, and the time it took to build was not satisfying. We decided to move to Gatsby to take advantage of its use of React , as well as its incredibly high performances in terms of build and page rendering.

    See more
    Jekyll logo

    Jekyll

    1.5K
    1.3K
    231
    Blog-aware, static site generator in Ruby
    1.5K
    1.3K
    + 1
    231
    PROS OF JEKYLL
    • 75
      Github pages integration
    • 54
      Open source
    • 37
      It's slick, customisable and hackerish
    • 24
      Easy to deploy
    • 23
      Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
    • 7
      Gitlab pages integration
    • 5
      Best for blogging
    • 2
      Low maintenance
    • 2
      Easy to integrate localization
    • 1
      Huge plugins ecosystem
    • 1
      Authoring freedom and simplicity
    CONS OF JEKYLL
    • 4
      Build time increases exponentially as site grows
    • 2
      Lack of developments lately
    • 1
      Og doesn't work with postings dynamically

    related Jekyll posts

    Dale Ross
    Independent Contractor at Self Employed | 22 upvotes 路 1.2M views

    I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

    I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

    Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

    See more
    Josh Dzielak
    Co-Founder & CTO at Orbit | 5 upvotes 路 349.8K views
    Shared insights
    on
    JekyllJekyllHugoHugo

    Earlier this year, I migrated my personal website (dzello.com) from Jekyll to Hugo. My goal with the migration was to make the development environment as pleasant as possible and to make it really easy to add new types of content. For example, I knew I wanted to add a consulting page and some portfolio-style pages to show off talks I had given and projects I had worked on.

    I had heard about how fast Hugo was, so I tried it out with my content after using a simple migration tool. The results were impressive - the startup and rebuild times were in milliseconds, making the process of iterating on content or design less cumbersome. Then I started to see how I could use Hugo to create new page types and was very impressed by the flexibility of the content model. It took me a few days to really understand where content should go with Hugo, but then I felt very confident that I could create many different types of pages - even multiple blogs if I wanted - using a consistent syntax and with full control of the layouts and the URLs.

    After about 6 months, I've been very happy with the results of the migration. The dev environment is light and fast and I feel at ease adding new pages and sections to the site.

    See more
    Hexo logo

    Hexo

    297
    364
    69
    A fast, simple & powerful blog framework, powered by Node.js
    297
    364
    + 1
    69
    PROS OF HEXO
    • 18
      Ease of deployment
    • 13
      Uses NodeJS and npm
    • 12
      Easy GitHub Pages publishing
    • 10
      Powerful templating
    • 7
      Useful tools and plugins
    • 4
      Easy intergrating with js
    • 3
      Open source
    • 2
      Blazing Fast
    CONS OF HEXO
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Hexo posts

      Middleman logo

      Middleman

      168
      189
      63
      A static site generator using all the shortcuts and tools in modern web development
      168
      189
      + 1
      63
      PROS OF MIDDLEMAN
      • 19
        Rails for static sites
      • 17
        Erb, haml, slim
      • 17
        Live reload
      • 6
        Easy setup
      • 3
        Emacs org-mode integration by middleman-org
      • 1
        Make front-end easy and rock solid again
      CONS OF MIDDLEMAN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Middleman posts

        Ronan Levesque
        Software engineer at Algolia | 18 upvotes 路 273.5K views

        A few months ago we decided to move our whole static website (www.algolia.com) to a new stack. At the time we were using a website generator called Middleman, written in Ruby. As a team of only front-end developers we didn't feel very comfortable with the language itself, and the time it took to build was not satisfying. We decided to move to Gatsby to take advantage of its use of React , as well as its incredibly high performances in terms of build and page rendering.

        See more
        MkDocs logo

        MkDocs

        78
        118
        8
        A static site generator
        78
        118
        + 1
        8
        PROS OF MKDOCS
        • 3
          Speed
        • 3
          Gitlab integration
        • 1
          Extensibility
        • 1
          Themes
        CONS OF MKDOCS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related MkDocs posts

          Nikolaj Ivancic

          I want to build a documentation tool - functionally equivalent to MkDocs. The initial choice ought to be VuePress - but I know of at least one respectable developer who started with VuePress and switched to Nuxt.js. A rich set of "themes" is a plus and all documents ought to be in Markdown.

          Any opinions?

          See more