StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Gun vs Pusher

Gun vs Pusher

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pusher
Pusher
Stacks618
Followers1.4K
Votes234
Gun
Gun
Stacks49
Followers87
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.7K
Forks1.2K

Gun vs Pusher: What are the differences?

<Introduction: Gun and Pusher are both tools used for real-time event-driven communication in web applications.>

  1. Performance: Gun is a decentralized, peer-to-peer database that can handle a higher volume of concurrent users compared to Pusher, which is a centralized service. This makes Gun more suitable for applications that require scalability and high performance.

  2. Cost: Pusher is a paid service that offers various pricing plans based on usage and features, while Gun is an open-source, free-to-use database solution. This makes Gun a more cost-effective option for developers looking to minimize their expenses.

  3. Data Storage: Gun stores data in a distributed manner across multiple peer nodes, providing data redundancy and better fault tolerance. In contrast, Pusher stores data in a centralized server, which may introduce a single point of failure.

  4. Customization: Gun allows for extensive customization and control over data handling, synchronization, and conflict resolution through its decentralized architecture. Pusher, on the other hand, offers a more simplified and managed approach, which can be easier to set up but may limit customization options.

  5. Integration: Pusher provides ready-to-use libraries and APIs for popular programming languages and frameworks, making it easier to integrate with existing applications. Gun may require more effort and developer expertise to integrate effectively due to its decentralized nature.

  6. Real-time Features: Pusher offers advanced features such as presence channels, webhooks, and user authentication mechanisms out of the box, making it suitable for complex real-time applications. Gun focuses more on the data synchronization aspect and may require additional development effort to implement similar real-time features.

In Summary, Gun and Pusher differ in terms of performance, cost, data storage, customization, integration, and real-time features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Pusher, Gun

tauschjl
tauschjl

Apr 22, 2021

Needs advice

I am building an IoT application that will utilize connected air quality sensors to provide real-time indoor air quality in offices. I want to be able to share this data with a few different databases, etc.

Wondering if anyone has any advice on which real-time streaming API would be best for this sort of application, or even how I should think about it?

38.1k views38.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Pusher
Pusher
Gun
Gun

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

GUN is a realtime, decentralized, embedded, graph database engine.

Easily build scalable in-app notifications, chat, realtime graphs, geotracking and more in your web & mobile apps with our hosted pub/sub messaging API.;Send programmable push notifications to iOS and Android devices with delivery and open rate tracking built in.;Easily add 1-1 and group Chat to your web & mobile apps. Presence, message storage, rich media, notifications, typing indicators and more.;Embed a realtime collaborative editor in your app in seconds to empower your users to do more, together.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
18.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
618
Stacks
49
Followers
1.4K
Followers
87
Votes
234
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 55
    An easy way to give customers realtime features
  • 40
    Websockets
  • 34
    Simple
  • 27
    Easy to get started with
  • 25
    Free plan
Cons
  • 11
    Costly
Pros
  • 0
    Open source
  • 0
    Real time
  • 0
    Small size
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Datadog
Datadog
Librato
Librato
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Pusher, Gun?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase