StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Habitus vs XMPP

Habitus vs XMPP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

XMPP
XMPP
Stacks71
Followers138
Votes0
Habitus
Habitus
Stacks6
Followers12
Votes0

Habitus vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Habitus and XMPP.

  1. Protocol vs Tool: Habitus is a protocol used for building and sharing Docker images securely, while XMPP is a communication protocol mainly used for instant messaging and presence information.

  2. Use Case: Habitus is designed specifically for Docker images, providing a structured way to build and share them, while XMPP is a general-purpose protocol that can be used for a wide variety of communication applications beyond just image building.

  3. Security Focus: Habitus puts a strong emphasis on security features such as signed builds and verified sources to ensure the integrity of Docker images, while XMPP focuses more on real-time communication security like end-to-end encryption.

  4. Community Support: XMPP has a larger community and a longer history of development, leading to a wider adoption and support network, whereas Habitus, being more specialized, may have a smaller but highly focused user base.

  5. Extensibility: XMPP allows for easy extensions and customizations, making it adaptable to various use cases and scenarios, while Habitus is more rigid in its structure due to its specific focus on Docker image building workflows.

  6. Scalability: XMPP is known for its scalability and ability to support a large number of users and messages efficiently, while Habitus may not have the same scalability features as it is more targeted towards a specific domain of Docker image management.

In Summary, Habitus and XMPP differ in their focus on Docker image building, security measures, community support, extensibility, and scalability capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

XMPP
XMPP
Habitus
Habitus

It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.

Habitus is a standalone build flow tool for Docker. It’s a command line tool that builds Docker images based on their Dockerfile and a build.yml. This is particularly useful if your code is in compiled languages like Java or Go or if you need to use secrets like SSH keys during the build.

Statistics
Stacks
71
Stacks
6
Followers
138
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Java
Java
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript
Docker
Docker
Cloud 66
Cloud 66

What are some alternatives to XMPP, Habitus?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot