Howitzer vs Robot Framework

Overview

Robot Framework

Stacks345

Followers525

Votes120

Howitzer

Stacks1

Followers1

Votes0

GitHub Stars259

Forks27

Howitzer vs Robot Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Howitzer and Robot Framework are as follows:

Programming Language Support: Howitzer is based on Ruby, while Robot Framework is based on Python. This difference in programming languages may influence the preference of users based on their knowledge and comfort with the respective languages.
Syntax Readability: Howitzer focuses on providing a more human-friendly and readable syntax for test automation, making it easier for non-technical users to understand and contribute to the test automation process. On the other hand, Robot Framework has a syntax that is more structured and may be preferred by users who prioritize consistency and clarity in their test scripts.
Built-in Libraries and Plugins: Robot Framework offers a wide range of built-in libraries and plugins that provide additional functionality for test automation, such as database testing, web service testing, and GUI testing. Howitzer, while extensible, may require more manual configuration and integration of external libraries to achieve similar capabilities.
Community and Support: Robot Framework has a larger and more established community of users and contributors, which can be beneficial for receiving support, finding resources, and staying updated on the latest developments in test automation. Howitzer, being a smaller framework, may have a more limited support network and available resources.
Integration with Tools and Technologies: Howitzer has been designed for seamless integration with commonly used development tools and technologies, such as continuous integration systems and version control systems. Robot Framework also offers good integration capabilities but may have a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with its ecosystem.
Flexibility and Customization: Howitzer provides a higher degree of flexibility and customization options for tailoring the test automation framework to specific project requirements and preferences. While Robot Framework is also customizable, Howitzer may offer more granular control over the framework structure and functionality to meet unique testing needs.

In Summary, the key differences between Howitzer and Robot Framework lie in their programming language support, syntax readability, built-in libraries, community support, integration capabilities, and flexibility/customization options for test automation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Robot Framework	Howitzer
It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.	It uses the best practices and design patterns allowing to generate a test project in less than 5 minutes. It has out-of-the-box configurations for parallel cross-browser testing in the Cloud.
-	Independent; Fast; Elegant; BDD tool; Easier Support; Test against browserless drivers
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 259
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 27
Stacks 345	Stacks 1
Followers 525	Followers 1
Votes 120	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 23 Easy with CI/CD 22 Open Source 21 Simple Usage 14 Easily extendable 13 Vast Scope more than Front End Cons 8 Nested Loops 1 Mostly for python 1 Devtooling is not there 0 Extensive library support 0 Mobile supports	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Jenkins Rake Sauce Labs Web Starter Kit Mailgun BrowserStack RuboCop Cucumber Ruby CrossBrowserTesting

What are some alternatives to Robot Framework, Howitzer?

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

Howitzer vs Robot Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Howitzer and Robot Framework are as follows:

Programming Language Support: Howitzer is based on Ruby, while Robot Framework is based on Python. This difference in programming languages may influence the preference of users based on their knowledge and comfort with the respective languages.
Syntax Readability: Howitzer focuses on providing a more human-friendly and readable syntax for test automation, making it easier for non-technical users to understand and contribute to the test automation process. On the other hand, Robot Framework has a syntax that is more structured and may be preferred by users who prioritize consistency and clarity in their test scripts.
Built-in Libraries and Plugins: Robot Framework offers a wide range of built-in libraries and plugins that provide additional functionality for test automation, such as database testing, web service testing, and GUI testing. Howitzer, while extensible, may require more manual configuration and integration of external libraries to achieve similar capabilities.
Community and Support: Robot Framework has a larger and more established community of users and contributors, which can be beneficial for receiving support, finding resources, and staying updated on the latest developments in test automation. Howitzer, being a smaller framework, may have a more limited support network and available resources.
Integration with Tools and Technologies: Howitzer has been designed for seamless integration with commonly used development tools and technologies, such as continuous integration systems and version control systems. Robot Framework also offers good integration capabilities but may have a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with its ecosystem.
Flexibility and Customization: Howitzer provides a higher degree of flexibility and customization options for tailoring the test automation framework to specific project requirements and preferences. While Robot Framework is also customizable, Howitzer may offer more granular control over the framework structure and functionality to meet unique testing needs.

Howitzer vs Robot Framework

Overview