Alternatives to Icinga logo

Alternatives to Icinga

Nagios, Sensu, Shinken, Zabbix, and PRTG are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Icinga.
98
73
+ 1
0

What is Icinga and what are its top alternatives?

It monitors availability and performance, gives you simple access to relevant data and raises alerts to keep you in the loop. It was originally created as a fork of the Nagios system monitoring application.
Icinga is a tool in the Monitoring Tools category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Icinga

  • Nagios

    Nagios

    Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License. ...

  • Sensu

    Sensu

    Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments. ...

  • Shinken

    Shinken

    Shinken's main goal is to give users a flexible architecture for their monitoring system that is designed to scale to large environments. Shinken is backwards-compatible with the Nagios configuration standard and plugins. It works on any operating system and architecture that supports Python, which includes Windows, GNU/Linux and FreeBSD. ...

  • Zabbix

    Zabbix

    Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics. ...

  • PRTG

    PRTG

    It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications. ...

  • Prometheus

    Prometheus

    Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true. ...

  • LibreNMS

    LibreNMS

    It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more. ...

  • Grafana

    Grafana

    Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins. ...

Icinga alternatives & related posts

Nagios logo

Nagios

775
905
102
Complete monitoring and alerting for servers, switches, applications, and services
775
905
+ 1
102
PROS OF NAGIOS
  • 53
    It just works
  • 28
    The standard
  • 12
    Customizable
  • 8
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 1
    Huge stack of free checks/plugins to choose from
CONS OF NAGIOS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Nagios posts

    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 14 upvotes · 2.9M views

    Why we spent several years building an open source, large-scale metrics alerting system, M3, built for Prometheus:

    By late 2014, all services, infrastructure, and servers at Uber emitted metrics to a Graphite stack that stored them using the Whisper file format in a sharded Carbon cluster. We used Grafana for dashboarding and Nagios for alerting, issuing Graphite threshold checks via source-controlled scripts. While this worked for a while, expanding the Carbon cluster required a manual resharding process and, due to lack of replication, any single node’s disk failure caused permanent loss of its associated metrics. In short, this solution was not able to meet our needs as the company continued to grow.

    To ensure the scalability of Uber’s metrics backend, we decided to build out a system that provided fault tolerant metrics ingestion, storage, and querying as a managed platform...

    https://eng.uber.com/m3/

    (GitHub : https://github.com/m3db/m3)

    See more
    Sensu logo

    Sensu

    192
    225
    55
    Simple. Scalable. Multi-cloud monitoring.
    192
    225
    + 1
    55
    PROS OF SENSU
    • 13
      Support for almost anything
    • 11
      Easy setup
    • 9
      Message routing
    • 7
      Devs can code their own checks
    • 5
      Ease of use
    • 3
      Nagios plugin compatibility
    • 3
      Price
    • 3
      Easy configuration, scales well and performance is good
    • 1
      Written in Go
    CONS OF SENSU
    • 1
      Plugins
    • 1
      Written in Go

    related Sensu posts

    Shinken logo

    Shinken

    14
    31
    0
    Nagios compatible monitoring framework, written in Python
    14
    31
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF SHINKEN
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF SHINKEN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Shinken posts

        Zabbix logo

        Zabbix

        529
        750
        58
        Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources
        529
        750
        + 1
        58
        PROS OF ZABBIX
        • 16
          Free
        • 7
          Alerts
        • 5
          Service/node/network discovery
        • 4
          Base metrics from the box
        • 4
          Templates
        • 3
          Multi-dashboards
        • 3
          SMS/Email/Messenger alerts
        • 2
          Support proxies (for monitoring remote branches)
        • 2
          Supports Graphs ans screens
        • 2
          Grafana plugin available
        • 1
          Perform website checking (response time, loading, ...)
        • 1
          Supports large variety of Operating Systems
        • 1
          Supports JMX (Java, Tomcat, Jboss, ...)
        • 1
          Open source
        • 1
          API available for creating own apps
        • 1
          Templates free available (Zabbix Share)
        • 1
          Works with multiple databases
        • 1
          Advanced integrations
        • 1
          Supports multiple protocols/agents
        • 1
          Complete Logs Report
        CONS OF ZABBIX
        • 5
          The UI is in PHP
        • 2
          Puppet module is sluggish

        related Zabbix posts

        Shared insights
        on
        DatadogDatadogZabbixZabbixCentreonCentreon

        My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

        See more
        PRTG logo

        PRTG

        40
        52
        0
        A powerful & easy network monitoring software
        40
        52
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF PRTG
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF PRTG
            Be the first to leave a con

            related PRTG posts

            Prometheus logo

            Prometheus

            2.5K
            3K
            236
            An open-source service monitoring system and time series database, developed by SoundCloud
            2.5K
            3K
            + 1
            236
            PROS OF PROMETHEUS
            • 46
              Powerful easy to use monitoring
            • 38
              Flexible query language
            • 32
              Dimensional data model
            • 27
              Alerts
            • 22
              Active and responsive community
            • 21
              Extensive integrations
            • 19
              Easy to setup
            • 12
              Beautiful Model and Query language
            • 7
              Easy to extend
            • 6
              Nice
            • 3
              Written in Go
            • 2
              Good for experimentation
            • 1
              Easy for monitoring
            CONS OF PROMETHEUS
            • 11
              Just for metrics
            • 6
              Bad UI
            • 6
              Needs monitoring to access metrics endpoints
            • 3
              Not easy to configure and use
            • 3
              Supports only active agents
            • 2
              Written in Go
            • 2
              Requires multiple applications and tools
            • 2
              TLS is quite difficult to understand

            related Prometheus posts

            Conor Myhrvold
            Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 14 upvotes · 2.9M views

            Why we spent several years building an open source, large-scale metrics alerting system, M3, built for Prometheus:

            By late 2014, all services, infrastructure, and servers at Uber emitted metrics to a Graphite stack that stored them using the Whisper file format in a sharded Carbon cluster. We used Grafana for dashboarding and Nagios for alerting, issuing Graphite threshold checks via source-controlled scripts. While this worked for a while, expanding the Carbon cluster required a manual resharding process and, due to lack of replication, any single node’s disk failure caused permanent loss of its associated metrics. In short, this solution was not able to meet our needs as the company continued to grow.

            To ensure the scalability of Uber’s metrics backend, we decided to build out a system that provided fault tolerant metrics ingestion, storage, and querying as a managed platform...

            https://eng.uber.com/m3/

            (GitHub : https://github.com/m3db/m3)

            See more
            Matt Menzenski
            Senior Software Engineering Manager at PayIt · | 12 upvotes · 81.6K views

            Grafana and Prometheus together, running on Kubernetes , is a powerful combination. These tools are cloud-native and offer a large community and easy integrations. At PayIt we're using exporting Java application metrics using a Dropwizard metrics exporter, and our Node.js services now use the prom-client npm library to serve metrics.

            See more
            LibreNMS logo

            LibreNMS

            36
            118
            0
            Opensource Auto-discoverying network monitoring system
            36
            118
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF LIBRENMS
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF LIBRENMS
                Be the first to leave a con

                related LibreNMS posts

                Grafana logo

                Grafana

                10.9K
                8.5K
                398
                Open source Graphite & InfluxDB Dashboard and Graph Editor
                10.9K
                8.5K
                + 1
                398
                PROS OF GRAFANA
                • 84
                  Beautiful
                • 67
                  Graphs are interactive
                • 56
                  Free
                • 55
                  Easy
                • 33
                  Nicer than the Graphite web interface
                • 24
                  Many integrations
                • 16
                  Can build dashboards
                • 10
                  Easy to specify time window
                • 9
                  Dashboards contain number tiles
                • 8
                  Can collaborate on dashboards
                • 5
                  Integration with InfluxDB
                • 5
                  Click and drag to zoom in
                • 5
                  Open Source
                • 4
                  Authentification and users management
                • 4
                  Threshold limits in graphs
                • 3
                  It is open to cloud watch and many database
                • 2
                  You can visualize real time data to put alerts
                • 2
                  Great community support
                • 2
                  Alerts
                • 2
                  Simple and native support to Prometheus
                • 2
                  You can use this for development to check memcache
                • 0
                  Plugin visualizationa
                • 0
                  Grapsh as code
                CONS OF GRAFANA
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Grafana posts

                  Conor Myhrvold
                  Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 14 upvotes · 2.9M views

                  Why we spent several years building an open source, large-scale metrics alerting system, M3, built for Prometheus:

                  By late 2014, all services, infrastructure, and servers at Uber emitted metrics to a Graphite stack that stored them using the Whisper file format in a sharded Carbon cluster. We used Grafana for dashboarding and Nagios for alerting, issuing Graphite threshold checks via source-controlled scripts. While this worked for a while, expanding the Carbon cluster required a manual resharding process and, due to lack of replication, any single node’s disk failure caused permanent loss of its associated metrics. In short, this solution was not able to meet our needs as the company continued to grow.

                  To ensure the scalability of Uber’s metrics backend, we decided to build out a system that provided fault tolerant metrics ingestion, storage, and querying as a managed platform...

                  https://eng.uber.com/m3/

                  (GitHub : https://github.com/m3db/m3)

                  See more
                  Matt Menzenski
                  Senior Software Engineering Manager at PayIt · | 12 upvotes · 81.6K views

                  Grafana and Prometheus together, running on Kubernetes , is a powerful combination. These tools are cloud-native and offer a large community and easy integrations. At PayIt we're using exporting Java application metrics using a Dropwizard metrics exporter, and our Node.js services now use the prom-client npm library to serve metrics.

                  See more