Alternatives to New Relic logo

Alternatives to New Relic

Datadog, AppDynamics, Splunk, Airbrake, and Prometheus are the most popular alternatives and competitors to New Relic.
18K
6.3K
+ 1
1.9K

What is New Relic and what are its top alternatives?

New Relic is the all-in-one web application performance tool that lets you see performance from the end user experience, through servers, and down to the line of application code.
New Relic is a tool in the Performance Monitoring category of a tech stack.
New Relic is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here鈥檚 a link to New Relic's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to New Relic

  • Datadog

    Datadog

    Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog! ...

  • AppDynamics

    AppDynamics

    AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics. ...

  • Splunk

    Splunk

    It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data. ...

  • Airbrake

    Airbrake

    Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast. ...

  • Prometheus

    Prometheus

    Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true. ...

  • Sentry

    Sentry

    Sentry鈥檚 Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health. ...

  • Nagios

    Nagios

    Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License. ...

  • ruxit

    ruxit

    Ruxit is a all-in-one performance monitoring solution for cloud natives. In under five minutes customizable dashboard views show you your application's performance data. ...

New Relic alternatives & related posts

Datadog logo

Datadog

5.5K
4.7K
789
Unify logs, metrics, and traces from across your distributed infrastructure.
5.5K
4.7K
+ 1
789
PROS OF DATADOG
  • 132
    Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)
  • 104
    Easy setup
  • 84
    Powerful ui
  • 81
    Powerful integrations
  • 67
    Great value
  • 52
    Great visualization
  • 43
    Events + metrics = clarity
  • 40
    Custom metrics
  • 39
    Notifications
  • 37
    Flexibility
  • 17
    Free & paid plans
  • 14
    Great customer support
  • 13
    Makes my life easier
  • 8
    Easy setup and plugins
  • 8
    Adapts automatically as i scale up
  • 6
    Super easy and powerful
  • 5
    AWS support
  • 5
    In-context collaboration
  • 4
    Rich in features
  • 3
    Docker support
  • 3
    Cost
  • 3
    Best than others
  • 2
    Free setup
  • 2
    Monitor almost everything
  • 2
    Automation tools
  • 2
    Source control and bug tracking
  • 2
    Simple, powerful, great for infra
  • 2
    Full visibility of applications
  • 2
    Good for Startups
  • 2
    Cute logo
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Easy to Analyze
  • 1
    Best in the field
CONS OF DATADOG
  • 15
    Expensive
  • 2
    No errors exception tracking
  • 1
    External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging
  • 1
    Complicated

related Datadog posts

Robert Zuber

Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We鈥檝e got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We鈥檝e definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven鈥檛 had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We鈥檝e started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we鈥檝e seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.

We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.

See more

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

See more
AppDynamics logo

AppDynamics

239
452
57
Application management for the cloud generation
239
452
+ 1
57
PROS OF APPDYNAMICS
  • 17
    Deep code visibility
  • 10
    Powerful
  • 7
    Real-Time Visibility
  • 7
    Great visualization
  • 6
    Easy Setup
  • 5
    Comprehensive Coverage of Programming Languages
  • 3
    Deep DB Troubleshooting
  • 2
    Excellent Customer Support
CONS OF APPDYNAMICS
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 2
    Poor to non-existent integration with aws services

related AppDynamics posts

Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
Software Engineer at IVP | 5 upvotes 路 519K views

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

See more

Hi Folks,

I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?

See more
Splunk logo

Splunk

411
646
11
Search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data
411
646
+ 1
11
PROS OF SPLUNK
  • 2
    API for searching logs, running reports
  • 1
    Query engine supports joining, aggregation, stats, etc
  • 1
    Ability to style search results into reports
  • 1
    Query any log as key-value pairs
  • 1
    Splunk language supports string, date manip, math, etc
  • 1
    Granular scheduling and time window support
  • 1
    Alert system based on custom query results
  • 1
    Custom log parsing as well as automatic parsing
  • 1
    Dashboarding on any log contents
  • 1
    Rich GUI for searching live logs
CONS OF SPLUNK
  • 1
    Splunk query language rich so lots to learn

related Splunk posts

Shared insights
on
Kibana
Splunk
Grafana

I use Kibana because it ships with the ELK stack. I don't find it as powerful as Splunk however it is light years above grepping through log files. We previously used Grafana but found it to be annoying to maintain a separate tool outside of the ELK stack. We were able to get everything we needed from Kibana.

See more
Airbrake logo

Airbrake

250
267
128
Airbrake captures and groups errors in Ruby, iOS, Django, PHP & more.
250
267
+ 1
128
PROS OF AIRBRAKE
  • 28
    Reliable
  • 25
    Consolidates similar errors
  • 22
    Easy setup
  • 15
    Slack Integration
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 7
    Email notifications
  • 6
    Includes a free plan
  • 5
    Android Application to view errors.
  • 4
    Search and filtering
  • 4
    Shows request parameters
  • 2
    Heroku integration
CONS OF AIRBRAKE
  • 0
    Rejects error report if non-latin characters exists

related Airbrake posts

Prometheus logo

Prometheus

2.3K
2.7K
233
An open-source service monitoring system and time series database, developed by SoundCloud
2.3K
2.7K
+ 1
233
PROS OF PROMETHEUS
  • 43
    Powerful easy to use monitoring
  • 39
    Flexible query language
  • 32
    Dimensional data model
  • 26
    Alerts
  • 22
    Active and responsive community
  • 21
    Extensive integrations
  • 19
    Easy to setup
  • 12
    Beautiful Model and Query language
  • 7
    Easy to extend
  • 6
    Nice
  • 3
    Written in Go
  • 2
    Good for experimentation
  • 1
    Easy for monitoring
CONS OF PROMETHEUS
  • 11
    Just for metrics
  • 6
    Needs monitoring to access metrics endpoints
  • 5
    Bad UI
  • 3
    Not easy to configure and use
  • 2
    Requires multiple applications and tools
  • 2
    Written in Go
  • 2
    Supports only active agents
  • 1
    TLS is quite difficult to understand

related Prometheus posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber | 14 upvotes 路 2.8M views

Why we spent several years building an open source, large-scale metrics alerting system, M3, built for Prometheus:

By late 2014, all services, infrastructure, and servers at Uber emitted metrics to a Graphite stack that stored them using the Whisper file format in a sharded Carbon cluster. We used Grafana for dashboarding and Nagios for alerting, issuing Graphite threshold checks via source-controlled scripts. While this worked for a while, expanding the Carbon cluster required a manual resharding process and, due to lack of replication, any single node鈥檚 disk failure caused permanent loss of its associated metrics. In short, this solution was not able to meet our needs as the company continued to grow.

To ensure the scalability of Uber鈥檚 metrics backend, we decided to build out a system that provided fault tolerant metrics ingestion, storage, and querying as a managed platform...

https://eng.uber.com/m3/

(GitHub : https://github.com/m3db/m3)

See more

We have Prometheus as a monitoring engine as a part of our stack which contains Kubernetes cluster, container images and other open source tools. Also, I am aware that Sysdig can be integrated with Prometheus but I really wanted to know whether Sysdig or sysdig+prometheus will make better monitoring solution.

See more
Sentry logo

Sentry

9.5K
5.8K
846
See performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize code health.
9.5K
5.8K
+ 1
846
PROS OF SENTRY
  • 234
    Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy
  • 120
    Email Notifications
  • 107
    Open source
  • 84
    Slack integration
  • 69
    Github integration
  • 48
    Easy
  • 42
    User-friendly interface
  • 28
    The most important tool we use in production
  • 18
    Hipchat integration
  • 17
    Heroku Integration
  • 15
    Good documentation
  • 11
    Free tier
  • 9
    Self-hosted
  • 8
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Realiable
  • 6
    Provides context, and great stack trace
  • 4
    Love it baby
  • 4
    Feedback form on error pages
  • 3
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Captures local variables at each frame in backtraces
  • 3
    Super user friendly
  • 3
    Filter by custom tags
  • 3
    Easy Integration
CONS OF SENTRY
  • 9
    Confusing UI

related Sentry posts

Johnny Bell
Software Engineer at Weedmaps | 17 upvotes 路 611.1K views

For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

See more
Nagios logo

Nagios

759
856
102
Complete monitoring and alerting for servers, switches, applications, and services
759
856
+ 1
102
PROS OF NAGIOS
  • 53
    It just works
  • 28
    The standard
  • 12
    Customizable
  • 8
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 1
    Huge stack of free checks/plugins to choose from
CONS OF NAGIOS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Nagios posts

    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber | 14 upvotes 路 2.8M views

    Why we spent several years building an open source, large-scale metrics alerting system, M3, built for Prometheus:

    By late 2014, all services, infrastructure, and servers at Uber emitted metrics to a Graphite stack that stored them using the Whisper file format in a sharded Carbon cluster. We used Grafana for dashboarding and Nagios for alerting, issuing Graphite threshold checks via source-controlled scripts. While this worked for a while, expanding the Carbon cluster required a manual resharding process and, due to lack of replication, any single node鈥檚 disk failure caused permanent loss of its associated metrics. In short, this solution was not able to meet our needs as the company continued to grow.

    To ensure the scalability of Uber鈥檚 metrics backend, we decided to build out a system that provided fault tolerant metrics ingestion, storage, and querying as a managed platform...

    https://eng.uber.com/m3/

    (GitHub : https://github.com/m3db/m3)

    See more
    ruxit logo

    ruxit

    247
    22
    5
    Full stack availability and performance monitoring powered by artificial intelligence
    247
    22
    + 1
    5
    PROS OF RUXIT
    • 3
      Easy setup
    • 2
      Great customer support
    CONS OF RUXIT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related ruxit posts