Alternatives to ImageKit logo

Alternatives to ImageKit

Cloudinary, imgix, Google Drive, CloudFlare, and Dropbox are the most popular alternatives and competitors to ImageKit.
37
42
+ 1
31

What is ImageKit and what are its top alternatives?

ImageKit is a cloud-based image optimization and transformation service that helps developers to deliver optimized images effectively to end-users. It offers features such as on-the-fly image optimization, resizing, cropping, watermarking, and image format conversion. However, ImageKit has limitations in terms of pricing and may be costly for high-traffic websites.

  1. Cloudinary: Cloudinary is a comprehensive cloud-based image and video management solution that offers powerful transformation capabilities, responsive delivery, and AI-based optimization. Pros: Extensive features, high performance. Cons: Higher pricing compared to some alternatives.
  2. Imgix: Imgix is an image processing service that provides real-time image optimization, resizing, and delivery through a content delivery network (CDN). Pros: Fast processing, easy integration. Cons: Limited free plan.
  3. Kraken.io: Kraken.io is an online image optimization tool that helps in reducing image file sizes without losing quality. Pros: Affordable pricing, simple to use. Cons: Limited features compared to some competitors.
  4. Thumbor: Thumbor is an open-source smart imaging service that allows users to crop, resize, and filter images on-the-fly. Pros: Customizable, open-source. Cons: Requires more technical knowledge for setup.
  5. Fastly Image Optimizer: Fastly Image Optimizer is a real-time image optimization and transformation tool that helps in delivering optimized images at the edge. Pros: High performance, real-time processing. Cons: Pricing based on usage may vary.
  6. Sirv: Sirv is an all-in-one media asset management solution that provides features like image optimization, delivery, and real-time manipulation. Pros: Integrated platform, user-friendly interface. Cons: Pricing can be expensive for high usage.
  7. Img4Me: Img4Me is an API-based image optimization service that offers features like resizing, compression, and format conversion. Pros: Easy to use API, affordable pricing. Cons: Limited customization options.
  8. Venngage Image Resizer: Venngage Image Resizer is a free online tool for resizing images with ease. Pros: Free to use, simple interface. Cons: Limited features compared to full-fledged image optimization services.
  9. ResizePixel: ResizePixel is an online image resizing tool that offers quick and easy image resizing with options for compression and format conversion. Pros: Free to use, no sign-up required. Cons: Limited features for advanced optimization.
  10. TinyIMG: TinyIMG is a Shopify app that helps in optimizing images for online stores by reducing file sizes and improving page load times. Pros: Integration with Shopify, automatic optimization. Cons: Limited to Shopify platform users.

Top Alternatives to ImageKit

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • imgix
    imgix

    imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • MaxCDN
    MaxCDN

    The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them. ...

ImageKit alternatives & related posts

Cloudinary logo

Cloudinary

598
179
An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
598
179
PROS OF CLOUDINARY
  • 37
    Easy setup
  • 31
    Fast image delivery
  • 26
    Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
  • 21
    Free tier
  • 11
    Heroku add-on
  • 9
    Reduce development costs
  • 7
    Amazing support
  • 6
    Heroku plugin
  • 6
    Great libraries for all languages
  • 6
    Virtually limitless scale
  • 5
    Easy to integrate with Rails
  • 4
    Cheap
  • 3
    Shot setup time
  • 3
    Very easy setup
  • 2
    Solves alot of image problems.
  • 1
    Best in the market and includes free plan
  • 1
    Extremely generous free pricing tier
  • 0
    Fast image delivery, vast array
CONS OF CLOUDINARY
  • 5
    Paid plan is expensive

related Cloudinary posts

imgix logo

imgix

217
177
Optimize, manage, and deliver images and videos for faster pages, better visual quality, and a simpler workflow.
217
177
PROS OF IMGIX
  • 28
    Image processing on demand
  • 24
    Easy setup
  • 18
    Smart Cropping
  • 18
    Reduce Development Costs
  • 15
    Efficient
  • 12
    Insanely Fast
  • 11
    Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
  • 10
    Easy to understand pricing
  • 9
    Professional Features and Options
  • 6
    Excellent Face Detection
  • 6
    Lightyears better than ImageMagick
  • 5
    S3 as source
  • 4
    Great for Dynamic Compositing
  • 4
    Scales to your company's needs
  • 1
    Free tier
  • 1
    Amazing support
  • 1
    Great libraries and integrations
  • 1
    Automatic scrset generation
  • 1
    Forward thinking
  • 1
    Video encoding
  • 1
    Fast Image Delivery
CONS OF IMGIX
    Be the first to leave a con

    related imgix posts

    Mountain/ \Ash

    Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

    See more
    Mountain/ \Ash

    In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

    See more
    Google Drive logo

    Google Drive

    82.2K
    2.1K
    A safe place for all your files
    82.2K
    2.1K
    PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
    • 505
      Easy to use
    • 326
      Gmail integration
    • 312
      Enough free space
    • 268
      Collaboration
    • 249
      Stable service
    • 128
      Desktop and mobile apps
    • 97
      Offline sync
    • 79
      Apps
    • 74
      15 gb storage
    • 50
      Add-ons
    • 9
      Integrates well
    • 6
      Easy to use
    • 3
      Simple back-up tool
    • 2
      Amazing
    • 2
      Beautiful
    • 2
      Fast upload speeds
    • 2
      The more the merrier
    • 2
      So easy
    • 2
      Wonderful
    • 2
      Linux terminal transfer tools
    • 2
      It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
    • 1
      UI
    • 1
      Windows desktop
    • 1
      G Suite integration
    CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
    • 7
      Organization via web ui sucks
    • 2
      Not a real database

    related Google Drive posts

    Tom Klein

    Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

    I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

    Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

    See more
    CloudFlare logo

    CloudFlare

    76.7K
    1.8K
    The Web Performance & Security Company.
    76.7K
    1.8K
    PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
    • 424
      Easy setup, great cdn
    • 277
      Free ssl
    • 199
      Easy setup
    • 190
      Security
    • 180
      Ssl
    • 98
      Great cdn
    • 77
      Optimizer
    • 71
      Simple
    • 44
      Great UI
    • 28
      Great js cdn
    • 12
      Apps
    • 12
      HTTP/2 Support
    • 12
      DNS Analytics
    • 12
      AutoMinify
    • 9
      Rocket Loader
    • 9
      Ipv6
    • 9
      Easy
    • 8
      IPv6 "One Click"
    • 8
      Fantastic CDN service
    • 7
      DNSSEC
    • 7
      Nice DNS
    • 7
      SSHFP
    • 7
      Free GeoIP
    • 7
      Amazing performance
    • 7
      API
    • 7
      Cheapest SSL
    • 6
      SPDY
    • 6
      Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
    • 5
      Ubuntu
    • 5
      Asynchronous resource loading
    • 4
      Global Load Balancing
    • 4
      Performance
    • 4
      Easy Use
    • 3
      CDN
    • 2
      Registrar
    • 2
      Support for SSHFP records
    • 1
      Web3
    • 1
      Прохси
    • 1
      HTTPS3/Quic
    CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
    • 2
      No support for SSHFP records
    • 2
      Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

    related CloudFlare posts

    Tom Klein

    Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

    See more
    Johnny Bell

    When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

    One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

    Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

    When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

    I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

    See more
    Dropbox logo

    Dropbox

    23.3K
    1.7K
    Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
    23.3K
    1.7K
    PROS OF DROPBOX
    • 434
      Easy to work with
    • 256
      Free
    • 216
      Popular
    • 176
      Shared file hosting
    • 167
      'just works'
    • 100
      No brainer
    • 79
      Integration with external services
    • 76
      Simple
    • 49
      Good api
    • 38
      Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
    • 11
      It just works
    • 8
      Convenient
    • 7
      Accessible from all of my devices
    • 5
      Command Line client
    • 4
      Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
    • 4
      Can even be used by your grandma
    • 3
      Reliable
    • 3
      Sync API
    • 3
      Mac app
    • 3
      Cross platform app
    • 2
      Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
    • 2
      Delta synchronization
    • 2
      Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
    • 2
      Backups, local and cloud
    • 2
      Extended version history
    • 2
      Beautiful UI
    • 1
      YC Company
    • 1
      What a beautiful app
    • 1
      Easy/no setup
    • 1
      So easy
    • 1
      The more the merrier
    • 1
      Easy to work with
    • 1
      For when client needs file without opening firewall
    • 1
      Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Official Linux app
    • 0
      The more the merrier
    CONS OF DROPBOX
    • 3
      Personal vs company account is confusing
    • 1
      Replication kills CPU and battery

    related Dropbox posts

    Shared insights
    on
    Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

    I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

    Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

    Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

    See more
    Amazon CloudFront logo

    Amazon CloudFront

    21.3K
    935
    Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
    21.3K
    935
    PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
    • 245
      Fast
    • 166
      Cdn
    • 157
      Compatible with other aws services
    • 125
      Simple
    • 108
      Global
    • 41
      Cheap
    • 36
      Cost-effective
    • 27
      Reliable
    • 19
      One stop solution
    • 9
      Elastic
    • 1
      Object store
    • 1
      HTTP/2 Support
    CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
    • 3
      UI could use some work
    • 1
      Invalidations take so long

    related Amazon CloudFront posts

    Russel Werner
    Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

    StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

    Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

    #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

    See more
    Julien DeFrance
    Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

    Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

    I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

    For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

    Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

    Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

    Future improvements / technology decisions included:

    Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

    As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

    One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

    See more
    Akamai logo

    Akamai

    1.9K
    0
    The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
    1.9K
    0
    PROS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF AKAMAI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Akamai posts

        MaxCDN logo

        MaxCDN

        1.6K
        100
        Our CDN makes your site load faster!
        1.6K
        100
        PROS OF MAXCDN
        • 47
          Easy setup
        • 33
          Speed to my clients
        • 15
          Great service & Customer Support
        • 5
          Shared and Affordable SSL
        CONS OF MAXCDN
          Be the first to leave a con

          related MaxCDN posts

          Justin Dorfman
          Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 245.7K views

          When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

          What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

          For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

          • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
          • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
          • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

          Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

          See more
          Todd Gardner

          We migrated the hosting of our CDN, which is used to serve the JavaScript Error collection agent, from Amazon CloudFront to MaxCDN. During our test, we found MaxCDN to be more reliable and less expensive for serving he file.

          The reports and controls were also considerably better.

          See more