Alternatives to Imagify logo

Alternatives to Imagify

TinyPNG, Kraken.io, OpenCV, Cloudinary, and FFMPEG are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Imagify.
16
32
+ 1
0

What is Imagify and what are its top alternatives?

Speed up your website by reducing the size of your images without losing quality.
Imagify is a tool in the Image Processing and Management category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Imagify

  • TinyPNG
    TinyPNG

    Make your website faster and save bandwidth. It optimizes your PNG images by 50-80% while preserving full transparency. ...

  • Kraken.io
    Kraken.io

    It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API. ...

  • OpenCV
    OpenCV

    OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform. ...

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • FFMPEG
    FFMPEG

    The universal multimedia toolkit.

  • imgix
    imgix

    imgix is the leading visual media platform that businesses choose to improve user experience, website performance, and cost-saving. imgix offers robust image and video processing, global content delivery, and intelligent asset management. ...

  • scikit-image
    scikit-image

    scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

  • Pillow
    Pillow

    It adds image processing capabilities to your Python interpreter. It provides extensive file format support, an efficient internal representation, and fairly powerful image processing capabilities. ...

Imagify alternatives & related posts

TinyPNG logo

TinyPNG

13
23
0
Uses smart compression techniques to reduce the file size of your PNG files
13
23
+ 1
0
PROS OF TINYPNG
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF TINYPNG
      Be the first to leave a con

      related TinyPNG posts

      Kraken.io logo

      Kraken.io

      16
      52
      7
      Image optimization and compression API
      16
      52
      + 1
      7
      PROS OF KRAKEN.IO
      • 6
        Free
      • 1
        Magento plugin
      CONS OF KRAKEN.IO
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Kraken.io posts

        OpenCV logo

        OpenCV

        1K
        1K
        97
        Open Source Computer Vision Library
        1K
        1K
        + 1
        97
        PROS OF OPENCV
        • 36
          Computer Vision
        • 17
          Open Source
        • 12
          Imaging
        • 9
          Machine Learning
        • 9
          Face Detection
        • 6
          Great community
        • 4
          Realtime Image Processing
        • 2
          Helping almost CV problem
        • 2
          Image Augmentation
        CONS OF OPENCV
          Be the first to leave a con

          related OpenCV posts

          Shared insights
          on
          FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

          Hi Team,

          Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

          Thank you in Advance.

          See more
          Cloudinary logo

          Cloudinary

          554
          568
          179
          An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
          554
          568
          + 1
          179
          PROS OF CLOUDINARY
          • 37
            Easy setup
          • 31
            Fast image delivery
          • 26
            Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
          • 21
            Free tier
          • 11
            Heroku add-on
          • 9
            Reduce development costs
          • 7
            Amazing support
          • 6
            Heroku plugin
          • 6
            Great libraries for all languages
          • 6
            Virtually limitless scale
          • 5
            Easy to integrate with Rails
          • 4
            Cheap
          • 3
            Shot setup time
          • 3
            Very easy setup
          • 2
            Solves alot of image problems.
          • 1
            Best in the market and includes free plan
          • 1
            Extremely generous free pricing tier
          • 0
            Fast image delivery, vast array
          CONS OF CLOUDINARY
          • 5
            Paid plan is expensive

          related Cloudinary posts

          FFMPEG logo

          FFMPEG

          329
          235
          5
          The universal multimedia toolkit.
          329
          235
          + 1
          5
          PROS OF FFMPEG
          • 5
            Open Source
          CONS OF FFMPEG
            Be the first to leave a con

            related FFMPEG posts

            Shared insights
            on
            FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

            Hi Team,

            Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

            Thank you in Advance.

            See more
            imgix logo

            imgix

            214
            310
            176
            Optimize, manage, and deliver images and videos for faster pages, better visual quality, and a simpler workflow.
            214
            310
            + 1
            176
            PROS OF IMGIX
            • 28
              Image processing on demand
            • 24
              Easy setup
            • 18
              Smart Cropping
            • 18
              Reduce Development Costs
            • 15
              Efficient
            • 12
              Insanely Fast
            • 11
              Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
            • 10
              Easy to understand pricing
            • 9
              Professional Features and Options
            • 6
              Lightyears better than ImageMagick
            • 6
              Excellent Face Detection
            • 5
              S3 as source
            • 4
              Scales to your company's needs
            • 4
              Great for Dynamic Compositing
            • 1
              Video encoding
            • 1
              Fast Image Delivery
            • 1
              Free tier
            • 1
              Amazing support
            • 1
              Great libraries and integrations
            • 1
              Automatic scrset generation
            CONS OF IMGIX
              Be the first to leave a con

              related imgix posts

              Mountain/ \Ash

              Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

              See more
              Mountain/ \Ash

              In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

              See more
              scikit-image logo

              scikit-image

              136
              126
              11
              Image processing in Python
              136
              126
              + 1
              11
              PROS OF SCIKIT-IMAGE
              • 6
                More powerful
              • 4
                Anaconda compatibility
              • 1
                Great documentation
              CONS OF SCIKIT-IMAGE
                Be the first to leave a con

                related scikit-image posts

                Pillow logo

                Pillow

                106
                2
                0
                Python Imaging Library
                106
                2
                + 1
                0
                PROS OF PILLOW
                  Be the first to leave a pro
                  CONS OF PILLOW
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related Pillow posts