Jasmine vs SuperTest

Overview

Jasmine

Stacks4.8K

Followers1.5K

Votes187

SuperTest

Stacks1.9K

Followers102

Votes0

Jasmine vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

Syntax: Jasmine uses a behavior-driven development (BDD) syntax that focuses on writing human-readable test specifications using keywords like describe, it, and expect. On the other hand, SuperTest uses a more traditional syntax that follows the express.js framework, where requests are sent using the get, post, put, etc. methods.
Testing Scope: Jasmine is primarily designed for unit testing and is suitable for testing individual functions, classes, or modules within an application. SuperTest, on the other hand, is designed for integration testing and is used to test the entire end-to-end functionality of an application, including the HTTP routes and endpoints.
Framework Compatibility: Jasmine is a testing framework that can be used with various JavaScript frameworks like Angular, React, and Node.js, whereas SuperTest is a testing library specifically designed for Node.js and Express applications, making it the preferred choice for testing HTTP servers built with Express.
Testing Approach: Jasmine follows a traditional testing approach where tests are written as separate files and executed using a test runner. SuperTest, on the other hand, integrates testing within the application code itself by using middleware, allowing the tests to be seamlessly executed alongside the application.
Assertions and Expectations: Jasmine provides a comprehensive set of assertion functions and matchers that enable developers to check the expected behavior of their code. SuperTest, on the other hand, relies on the expect library for assertions, which provides a more minimalist set of assertion methods.
HTTP Requests: SuperTest is specifically designed for testing HTTP requests and provides built-in methods like get, post, put, etc., which allow developers to easily simulate and test different types of HTTP requests. Jasmine does not have built-in support for making HTTP requests and requires additional libraries or frameworks to handle the HTTP requests.

In Summary, Jasmine is a behavior-driven testing framework primarily used for unit testing, while SuperTest is a library designed for integration testing of Node.js and Express applications, specifically focusing on testing HTTP endpoints.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jasmine, SuperTest

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.

231k views231k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jasmine	SuperTest
Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.	It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.
-	HTTP assertions;Asynchronous;Promise support
Statistics
Stacks 4.8K	Stacks 1.9K
Followers 1.5K	Followers 102
Votes 187	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 64 Can also be used for tdd 49 Open source 19 Originally from RSpec 15 Great community 14 No dependencies, not even DOM Cons 2 Unfriendly error logs	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Jasmine, SuperTest?

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

Baretest

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

Related Comparisons

Jasmine vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

Syntax: Jasmine uses a behavior-driven development (BDD) syntax that focuses on writing human-readable test specifications using keywords like describe, it, and expect. On the other hand, SuperTest uses a more traditional syntax that follows the express.js framework, where requests are sent using the get, post, put, etc. methods.
Testing Scope: Jasmine is primarily designed for unit testing and is suitable for testing individual functions, classes, or modules within an application. SuperTest, on the other hand, is designed for integration testing and is used to test the entire end-to-end functionality of an application, including the HTTP routes and endpoints.
Framework Compatibility: Jasmine is a testing framework that can be used with various JavaScript frameworks like Angular, React, and Node.js, whereas SuperTest is a testing library specifically designed for Node.js and Express applications, making it the preferred choice for testing HTTP servers built with Express.
Testing Approach: Jasmine follows a traditional testing approach where tests are written as separate files and executed using a test runner. SuperTest, on the other hand, integrates testing within the application code itself by using middleware, allowing the tests to be seamlessly executed alongside the application.
Assertions and Expectations: Jasmine provides a comprehensive set of assertion functions and matchers that enable developers to check the expected behavior of their code. SuperTest, on the other hand, relies on the expect library for assertions, which provides a more minimalist set of assertion methods.
HTTP Requests: SuperTest is specifically designed for testing HTTP requests and provides built-in methods like get, post, put, etc., which allow developers to easily simulate and test different types of HTTP requests. Jasmine does not have built-in support for making HTTP requests and requires additional libraries or frameworks to handle the HTTP requests.

Jasmine vs SuperTest

Overview