StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. JSLint vs Psalm

JSLint vs Psalm

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSLint
JSLint
Stacks88
Followers29
Votes0
Psalm
Psalm
Stacks22
Followers25
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.8K
Forks681

JSLint vs Psalm: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, tools like JSLint and Psalm are used for static analysis to catch potential bugs and improve code quality. Understanding the key differences between these two tools can help developers make informed decisions on which tool best suits their needs.

1. Code Languages Supported: JSLint is primarily focused on JavaScript, whereas Psalm is designed specifically for PHP codebases. This difference in language support means that JSLint is more suitable for developers working with JavaScript projects, while Psalm is better suited for those working with PHP codebases.

2. Tool Purpose: JSLint mainly focuses on identifying code style issues and potential errors in JavaScript code. On the other hand, Psalm is more focused on providing static analysis for PHP code, with a strong emphasis on type checking and code quality improvements. This difference in tool purpose reflects the specific needs and priorities of developers working with different programming languages.

3. Configuration Options: JSLint has fewer configuration options compared to Psalm. While JSLint has a more opinionated approach to code analysis, Psalm provides developers with more flexibility to customize the tool to suit their specific project requirements. This difference in configuration options can impact the level of control developers have over the tool's behavior.

4. IDE Integration: JSLint offers limited IDE integrations compared to Psalm. Psalm has better integration with popular IDEs like PhpStorm, VS Code, and Sublime Text, making it easier for developers to incorporate static analysis into their development workflow. This difference in IDE integration can affect the ease of use and seamless integration of the static analysis tool with the developer's preferred IDE.

5. Error Reporting: JSLint provides a more concise and opinionated style of error reporting, often presenting errors in a straightforward manner. On the other hand, Psalm offers more detailed error messages and code suggestions, providing developers with greater insight into potential issues and how to address them. This difference in error reporting can impact the developer's ability to quickly identify and resolve code issues.

6. Community Support and Updates: JSLint has been around for a longer time and has a more established community and history of updates. In comparison, Psalm is a newer tool with active development and frequent updates, reflecting the evolving needs and advancements in PHP static analysis tools. This difference in community support and updates can influence the availability of resources, support, and ongoing improvements for the tool.

In Summary, JSLint and Psalm differ in terms of language support, tool purpose, configuration options, IDE integration, error reporting, and community support and updates. Understanding these key differences can help developers choose the right static analysis tool for their specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSLint
JSLint
Psalm
Psalm

It is a static code analysis tool used in software development for checking if JavaScript source code complies with coding rules. It is provided primarily as a browser-based web application accessible through their domain, but there are also command-line adaptations.

It is a type-checking static analysis tool for PHP that finds bugs humans can miss, and improves code quality. It is designed to be useful on both large legacy codebases and small, modern ones. It can help you prevent the vast majority of type-related runtime errors, and also enables you to take advantage of safe coding patterns popular in other languages.

-
Open-source; Static analysis tool; Identify both obvious and hard-to-spot bugs in your code; Can automatically fix a number of the errors it finds
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
681
Stacks
88
Stacks
22
Followers
29
Followers
25
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to JSLint, Psalm?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana