Alternatives to JumpCloud logo

Alternatives to JumpCloud

Foxpass, OneLogin, Okta, Centrify, and Auth0 are the most popular alternatives and competitors to JumpCloud.
16
18
+ 1
0

What is JumpCloud and what are its top alternatives?

It is a Colorado-based startup that customers use to authenticate, authorize, and manage users, devices, and applications. They do it all easily via a common directory in the cloud, instead of through legacy, on-premises IT systems.
JumpCloud is a tool in the User Management and Authentication category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to JumpCloud

  • Foxpass

    Foxpass

    Helps technology companies improve their infrastructure security with its SaaS-based SSH-key hosting, LDAP, and RADIUS products. These services make it easy to have per-user logins to Linux machines, VPNs, and WiFi networks. ...

  • OneLogin

    OneLogin

    OneLogin provides a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) solution that offers simple single sign-on (SSO), making it easier for companies to secure and manage access to web applications both in the cloud and behind the firewall. ...

  • Okta

    Okta

    Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning. ...

  • Centrify

    Centrify

    It is privileged identity management and identity as a service solutions stop the breach by securing access to hybrid enterprises through the power of identity services. ...

  • Auth0

    Auth0

    A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications. ...

  • Duo

    Duo

    Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless. ...

  • Amazon Cognito

    Amazon Cognito

    You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline. ...

  • Keycloak

    Keycloak

    It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box. ...

JumpCloud alternatives & related posts

Foxpass logo

Foxpass

1
8
0
Automated Server and Network Access
1
8
+ 1
0
PROS OF FOXPASS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF FOXPASS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Foxpass posts

      OneLogin logo

      OneLogin

      84
      167
      6
      On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more
      84
      167
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF ONELOGIN
      • 2
        SAML
      • 1
        Great Customer Support
      • 1
        Easy setup
      • 1
        REST API
      • 1
        Directory synchronization
      CONS OF ONELOGIN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related OneLogin posts

        Okta logo

        Okta

        312
        666
        59
        Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
        312
        666
        + 1
        59
        PROS OF OKTA
        • 12
          REST API
        • 9
          SAML
        • 5
          OIDC OpenID Connect
        • 5
          User Provisioning
        • 5
          Easy LDAP integration
        • 4
          API Access Management - oAuth2 as a service
        • 4
          Universal Directory
        • 4
          Protect B2E, B2B, B2C apps
        • 3
          SSO, MFA for cloud, on-prem, custom apps
        • 3
          Easy Active Directory integration
        • 3
          Tons of Identity Management features
        • 1
          SWA applications Integration
        • 1
          SOC2
        CONS OF OKTA
        • 2
          Pricing is too high
        • 1
          Okta verify (Multi-factor Authentication)

        related Okta posts

        Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

        See more
        Centrify logo

        Centrify

        11
        24
        0
        Leader in securing enterprise identities against cyberthreats that target today’s hybrid IT environment of cloud, mobile and on-premises
        11
        24
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF CENTRIFY
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF CENTRIFY
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Centrify posts

            Auth0 logo

            Auth0

            1.1K
            1.7K
            208
            Token-based Single Sign On for your Apps and APIs with social, databases and enterprise identities
            1.1K
            1.7K
            + 1
            208
            PROS OF AUTH0
            • 63
              JSON web token
            • 31
              Integration with 20+ Social Providers
            • 20
              It's a universal solution
            • 20
              SDKs
            • 14
              Amazing Documentation
            • 11
              Heroku Add-on
            • 8
              Enterprise support
            • 7
              Extend platform with "rules"
            • 7
              Great Sample Repos
            • 4
              Azure Add-on
            • 3
              Passwordless
            • 3
              Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider
            • 2
              It can integrate seamlessly with firebase
            • 2
              Ruby
            • 2
              Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support
            • 2
              Polished
            • 2
              On-premise deployment
            • 1
              Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance
            • 1
              SAML Support
            • 1
              Active Directory support
            • 1
              Springboot
            • 1
              SOC2
            • 1
              Great support
            • 1
              OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support
            • 0
              A';P[];Æ`/
            CONS OF AUTH0
            • 12
              Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
            • 7
              Poor support
            • 4
              Status page not reflect actual status
            • 3
              Rapidly changing API

            related Auth0 posts

            Stephen Gheysens
            Senior Solutions Engineer at Twilio · | 14 upvotes · 434.4K views

            Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

            My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

            See more

            Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

            See more
            Duo logo

            Duo

            15
            34
            1
            A next-generation package manager for the front end
            15
            34
            + 1
            1
            PROS OF DUO
            • 1
              Lean and efficient
            CONS OF DUO
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Duo posts

              Amazon Cognito logo

              Amazon Cognito

              477
              739
              33
              Securely manage and synchronize app data for your users across their mobile devices
              477
              739
              + 1
              33
              PROS OF AMAZON COGNITO
              • 14
                Backed by Amazon
              • 7
                Manage Unique Identities
              • 3
                Work Offline
              • 3
                MFA
              • 2
                Store and Sync
              • 1
                It works
              • 1
                Integrate with Google, Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, SAML
              • 1
                SDKs and code samples
              • 1
                Free for first 50000 users
              CONS OF AMAZON COGNITO
              • 3
                Massive Pain to get working
              • 2
                Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
              • 2
                Documentation often out of date
              • 1
                MFA: there is no "forget device" function
              • 1
                Hard to find expiration times for tokens/codes
              • 1
                Lacks many basic features
              • 1
                There is no "Logout" method in the API
              • 1
                No recovery codes for MFA
              • 1
                Difficult to customize (basic-pack is more than humble)
              • 1
                Only paid support
              • 1
                Docs are vast but mostly useless

              related Amazon Cognito posts

              I'm starting a new React Native project and trying to decide on an auth provider. Currently looking at Auth0 and Amazon Cognito. It will need to play nice with a Django Rest Framework backend.

              See more
              Keycloak logo

              Keycloak

              454
              869
              65
              An open source identity and access management solution
              454
              869
              + 1
              65
              PROS OF KEYCLOAK
              • 25
                It's a open source solution
              • 18
                Supports multiple identity provider
              • 11
                OpenID and SAML support
              • 6
                Easy customisation
              • 5
                JSON web token
              CONS OF KEYCLOAK
              • 2
                Okta
              • 2
                Poor client side documentation
              • 2
                Lack of Code examples for client side

              related Keycloak posts

              Joshua Dean Küpper
              CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 7 upvotes · 346.4K views

              As the access to our global REST-API "Charon" is bound to OAuth2, we use Keycloak inside Quarkus to authenticate and authorize users of our API. It is not possible to perform any un-authenticated requests against this API, so we wanted to make really sure that the authentication/authorization component is absolutely reliable and tested. We found those attributes within Keycloak, so we used it.

              See more
              Shared insights
              on
              OktaOktaKeycloakKeycloak

              I want some good advice on which one I should prefer. (Keycloak or Okta) Since Keycloak is open source, it will be our first preference, but do we face some limitations with this approach? And since our product is SAAS based and we support the following authentications at present. 1. AT DB level 2. 3rd part IDP providers 3. LDAP/AD...

              See more