Alternatives to Kurento logo

Alternatives to Kurento

Jitsi, Wowza, WebRTC, GStreamer, and Mediasoup are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Kurento.
40
141
+ 1
5

What is Kurento and what are its top alternatives?

Kurento is an open-source multimedia framework that provides several functionalities to create rich WebRTC applications. Key features include real-time video and audio processing, recording, transcoding, and streaming. However, Kurento has some limitations such as complex setup and maintenance, lack of comprehensive documentation, and performance issues in large-scale deployments.

  1. Janus: Janus is a modular, open-source WebRTC server with plugin support. Key features include group communications, scalable architecture, and active community support. Pros include easy integration with existing applications and flexible plugin system. Cons include a steep learning curve for beginners.

  2. Jitsi: Jitsi is an open-source video conferencing platform with features like screen sharing, chat, and recording. Key features include end-to-end encryption, easy deployment, and cross-platform compatibility. Pros include strong security measures and user-friendly interface. Cons include occasional stability issues.

  3. Mediasoup: Mediasoup is a WebRTC server based on Node.js that offers advanced media capabilities for real-time communication. Key features include scalable architecture, audio and video routing, and low latency. Pros include powerful media processing capabilities and active developer community. Cons include limited documentation for beginners.

  4. OpenVidu: OpenVidu is a platform for building video conference applications with WebRTC. Key features include flexible APIs, screen sharing, and recording capabilities. Pros include simplified integration with existing applications and customizable layouts. Cons include limited support for advanced media processing.

  5. Wowza Streaming Engine: Wowza Streaming Engine is a customizable media server software with support for streaming protocols like WebRTC, RTMP, and HLS. Key features include adaptive bitrate streaming, DVR capabilities, and extensive codec support. Pros include robust streaming performance and wide protocol compatibility. Cons include high licensing costs for professional use.

  6. Ant Media Server: Ant Media Server is a scalable media server with support for WebRTC, RTMP, and HLS streaming. Key features include adaptive bitrate streaming, low latency, and cluster support for high availability. Pros include affordable pricing options and comprehensive documentation. Cons include limited community support.

  7. Pion WebRTC: Pion is a WebRTC framework for building scalable peer-to-peer applications. Key features include ICE and DTLS protocols, data channels, and flexible API. Pros include lightweight and modular design for custom development. Cons include limited out-of-the-box features compared to full-fledged media servers.

  8. KITE: KITE is an open-source WebRTC testing framework for automated testing of WebRTC applications. Key features include scriptable testing, real-time reporting, and integration with popular testing tools. Pros include comprehensive testing capabilities and community-driven development. Cons include a learning curve for setting up test environments.

  9. Red5: Red5 is an open-source media server with support for streaming protocols like RTMP, RTSP, and WebRTC. Key features include low latency streaming, server-side recording, and scalable architecture. Pros include flexible customization options and active open-source community. Cons include occasional stability issues in large-scale deployments.

  10. Cisco Webex: Cisco Webex is a cloud-based video conferencing platform with features like screen sharing, messaging, and whiteboarding. Key features include enterprise-grade security, integration with productivity tools, and large meeting support. Pros include reliable performance and extensive feature set. Cons include higher pricing for advanced features and scalability limitations.

Top Alternatives to Kurento

  • Jitsi
    Jitsi

    Jitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting. ...

  • Wowza
    Wowza

    It offers a customizable live streaming platform to build, deploy and manage high-quality video, live and on-demand. It powers professional-grade streaming for any use case and any device. ...

  • WebRTC
    WebRTC

    It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose. ...

  • GStreamer
    GStreamer

    It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing. ...

  • Mediasoup
    Mediasoup

    Mediasoup and its client side libraries provide a super low level API. They are intended to enable different use cases and scenarios, without any constraint or assumption. Some of these use cases are: Group video chat applications, One-to-many (or few-to-many) broadcasting applications in real-time, and RTP streaming. ...

  • Amazon Elastic Transcoder
    Amazon Elastic Transcoder

    Convert or transcode media files from their source format into versions that will playback on devices like smartphones, tablets and PCs. Create a transcoding “job” specifying the location of your source media file and how you want it transcoded. Amazon Elastic Transcoder also provides transcoding presets for popular output formats. All these features are available via service API, AWS SDKs and the AWS Management Console. ...

  • Cloudflare Stream
    Cloudflare Stream

    Cloudflare Stream makes integrating high-quality streaming video into a web or mobile application easy. Using a single, integrated workflow through a robust API or drag and drop UI, application owners can focus on creating the best video experience. ...

  • AWS Elemental MediaConvert
    AWS Elemental MediaConvert

    AWS Elemental MediaConvert is a file-based video transcoding service with broadcast-grade features. It allows you to easily create video-on-demand (VOD) content for broadcast and multiscreen delivery at scale. ...

Kurento alternatives & related posts

Jitsi logo

Jitsi

247
718
93
Multi-platform open-source video conferencing
247
718
+ 1
93
PROS OF JITSI
  • 32
    Open Source
  • 20
    Entirely free conferencing
  • 19
    Unlimited time
  • 5
    Accessible from browser
  • 3
    Desktop, app and browser tab sharing
  • 3
    WebRTC standard
  • 2
    Secure & encrypted video conference
  • 2
    Great API to develop with
  • 2
    Live stream to youtube
  • 1
    Dial-In and Dial-Out via SIP
  • 1
    Full HD
  • 1
    FSB Approved
  • 1
    Share youtube videos in conference
  • 1
    Easy installation and good support
  • 0
    MCU
CONS OF JITSI
  • 7
    UnLimited time
  • 5
    No multiplatform
  • 1
    Great quality
  • 1
    Good support
  • 1
    Live conference statistics
  • 1
    Great features

related Jitsi posts

Shared insights
on
JitsiJitsiZoomZoom

A common issue with Zoom is the "half-duplex" operation, where only one person can speak at a time, and another person speaking will cause an interrupt and take control. Hence the infernal mute button is so needed. Does Jitsi allow for a "full-duplex" communication to occur? An example scenario is two people singing a duet, which is impossible on a Zoom call.

Many Thanks, Garry

See more
Wowza logo

Wowza

37
70
0
A customizable live streaming platform
37
70
+ 1
0
PROS OF WOWZA
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF WOWZA
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Wowza posts

      We would like to connect a number of (about 25) video streams, from an Amazon S3 bucket containing video data to endpoints accessible to a Docker image, which, when run, will process the input video streams and emit some JSON statistics.

      The 25 video streams should be synchronized. Could people share their experiences with a similar scenario and perhaps offer advice about which is better (Wowza, Amazon Kinesis Video Streams) for this kind of problem, or why they chose one technology over the other?

      The video stream duration will be quite long (about 8 hours each x 25 camera sources). The 25 video streams will have no audio component. If you worked with a similar problem, what was your experience with scaling, latency, resource requirements, config, etc.?

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      WowzaWowzaBitmovinBitmovin

      We want to make a live streaming platform demo to show off our video compression technology.

      Simply put, we will stream content from 12 x 4K cameras ——> to an edge server(s) containing our compression software ——> either to Bitmovin or Wowza ——> to a media player.

      What we would like to know is, is one of the above streaming engines more suited to multiple feeds (we will eventually be using more than 100 4K cameras for the actual streaming platform), 4K content streaming, latency, and functions such as being to Zoom in on the 4K content?

      If anyone has any insight into the above, we would be grateful for your advice. We are a Japanese company and were recommended the above two streaming engines but know nothing about them as they literally “foreign” to us.

      Thanks so much.

      See more
      WebRTC logo

      WebRTC

      316
      526
      6
      A free, open project that provides browsers and mobile applications with Real-Time Communications
      316
      526
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF WEBRTC
      • 3
        OpenSource
      • 2
        No Download
      • 1
        You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc
      CONS OF WEBRTC
        Be the first to leave a con

        related WebRTC posts

        Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema

        See more
        joseph zeiad

        I am trying to implement video calling in a React Native app through Amazon Kinesis. But I was unlucky to find anything related to this on the web. Do you have any example code I can use? or any tutorial? If not, how easy is it to bridge the native library to RN? And what should I use WebRTC or Amazon Chime?? Thanks

        See more
        GStreamer logo

        GStreamer

        47
        80
        4
        Open source multimedia framework
        47
        80
        + 1
        4
        PROS OF GSTREAMER
        • 2
          Ease of use
        • 1
          Cross Platform
        • 1
          Open Source
        CONS OF GSTREAMER
          Be the first to leave a con

          related GStreamer posts

          Shared insights
          on
          GStreamerGStreamerFFMPEGFFMPEG

          I have a situation to convert the H264 streams into MP4 format using FFMPEG/GStreamer.

          However Im stuck with the gst-ugly plugin, now trying my luck with ffmeg. How big are the ffmeg libs and licensing complications?

          See more
          Mediasoup logo

          Mediasoup

          19
          90
          0
          Cutting Edge WebRTC Video Conferencing
          19
          90
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF MEDIASOUP
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF MEDIASOUP
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Mediasoup posts

              Amazon Elastic Transcoder logo

              Amazon Elastic Transcoder

              90
              114
              0
              Media transcoding in the cloud using Amazon EC2
              90
              114
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF AMAZON ELASTIC TRANSCODER
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF AMAZON ELASTIC TRANSCODER
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Amazon Elastic Transcoder posts

                  Alex Wendland

                  We were looking for a versatile #MediaTranscoding service for #video to convert TV shows and movies from large content providers into web #VideoStreaming formats. These content providers gave us files ranging from Apple ProRes to h.264, with file sizes from 1 GB to 100 GB, and we needed a tool that could cope with all of it. We looked at Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Zencoder, and eventually chose @Zencoder because it had support for every format we needed, good handling of sound channel remapping, and a clear UI with fast processing times. We automated our usage with it by writing a simple Python script to interact with it's API, and hosted the input and output AV files on Amazon S3, which it could easily talk to. So far we've converted 15 TB representing several thousand files using the service and are quite happy!

                  See more
                  Cloudflare Stream logo

                  Cloudflare Stream

                  46
                  53
                  3
                  Combine video encoding, global delivery, and player
                  46
                  53
                  + 1
                  3
                  PROS OF CLOUDFLARE STREAM
                  • 3
                    Love this tool
                  CONS OF CLOUDFLARE STREAM
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related Cloudflare Stream posts

                    AWS Elemental MediaConvert logo

                    AWS Elemental MediaConvert

                    42
                    71
                    0
                    Process video files and clips to prepare on-demand content for distribution or archiving
                    42
                    71
                    + 1
                    0
                    PROS OF AWS ELEMENTAL MEDIACONVERT
                      Be the first to leave a pro
                      CONS OF AWS ELEMENTAL MEDIACONVERT
                        Be the first to leave a con

                        related AWS Elemental MediaConvert posts