What is Kurento and what are its top alternatives?
Kurento is an open-source multimedia framework that provides several functionalities to create rich WebRTC applications. Key features include real-time video and audio processing, recording, transcoding, and streaming. However, Kurento has some limitations such as complex setup and maintenance, lack of comprehensive documentation, and performance issues in large-scale deployments.
Janus: Janus is a modular, open-source WebRTC server with plugin support. Key features include group communications, scalable architecture, and active community support. Pros include easy integration with existing applications and flexible plugin system. Cons include a steep learning curve for beginners.
Jitsi: Jitsi is an open-source video conferencing platform with features like screen sharing, chat, and recording. Key features include end-to-end encryption, easy deployment, and cross-platform compatibility. Pros include strong security measures and user-friendly interface. Cons include occasional stability issues.
Mediasoup: Mediasoup is a WebRTC server based on Node.js that offers advanced media capabilities for real-time communication. Key features include scalable architecture, audio and video routing, and low latency. Pros include powerful media processing capabilities and active developer community. Cons include limited documentation for beginners.
OpenVidu: OpenVidu is a platform for building video conference applications with WebRTC. Key features include flexible APIs, screen sharing, and recording capabilities. Pros include simplified integration with existing applications and customizable layouts. Cons include limited support for advanced media processing.
Wowza Streaming Engine: Wowza Streaming Engine is a customizable media server software with support for streaming protocols like WebRTC, RTMP, and HLS. Key features include adaptive bitrate streaming, DVR capabilities, and extensive codec support. Pros include robust streaming performance and wide protocol compatibility. Cons include high licensing costs for professional use.
Ant Media Server: Ant Media Server is a scalable media server with support for WebRTC, RTMP, and HLS streaming. Key features include adaptive bitrate streaming, low latency, and cluster support for high availability. Pros include affordable pricing options and comprehensive documentation. Cons include limited community support.
Pion WebRTC: Pion is a WebRTC framework for building scalable peer-to-peer applications. Key features include ICE and DTLS protocols, data channels, and flexible API. Pros include lightweight and modular design for custom development. Cons include limited out-of-the-box features compared to full-fledged media servers.
KITE: KITE is an open-source WebRTC testing framework for automated testing of WebRTC applications. Key features include scriptable testing, real-time reporting, and integration with popular testing tools. Pros include comprehensive testing capabilities and community-driven development. Cons include a learning curve for setting up test environments.
Red5: Red5 is an open-source media server with support for streaming protocols like RTMP, RTSP, and WebRTC. Key features include low latency streaming, server-side recording, and scalable architecture. Pros include flexible customization options and active open-source community. Cons include occasional stability issues in large-scale deployments.
Cisco Webex: Cisco Webex is a cloud-based video conferencing platform with features like screen sharing, messaging, and whiteboarding. Key features include enterprise-grade security, integration with productivity tools, and large meeting support. Pros include reliable performance and extensive feature set. Cons include higher pricing for advanced features and scalability limitations.
Top Alternatives to Kurento
JitsiJitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting. ...
WowzaIt offers a customizable live streaming platform to build, deploy and manage high-quality video, live and on-demand. It powers professional-grade streaming for any use case and any device. ...
WebRTCIt is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose. ...
GStreamerIt is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing. ...
MediasoupMediasoup and its client side libraries provide a super low level API. They are intended to enable different use cases and scenarios, without any constraint or assumption. Some of these use cases are: Group video chat applications, One-to-many (or few-to-many) broadcasting applications in real-time, and RTP streaming. ...
Google DriveKeep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...
CloudFlareCloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...
DropboxHarness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...
Kurento alternatives & related posts
- Open Source32
- Entirely free conferencing20
- Unlimited time19
- Accessible from browser5
- Desktop, app and browser tab sharing3
- WebRTC standard3
- Secure & encrypted video conference2
- Great API to develop with2
- Live stream to youtube2
- Dial-In and Dial-Out via SIP1
- Full HD1
- FSB Approved1
- Share youtube videos in conference1
- Easy installation and good support1
- MCU0
- UnLimited time7
- No multiplatform5
- Great quality1
- Good support1
- Live conference statistics1
- Great features1
related Jitsi posts
A common issue with Zoom is the "half-duplex" operation, where only one person can speak at a time, and another person speaking will cause an interrupt and take control. Hence the infernal mute button is so needed. Does Jitsi allow for a "full-duplex" communication to occur? An example scenario is two people singing a duet, which is impossible on a Zoom call.
Many Thanks, Garry
related Wowza posts
We would like to connect a number of (about 25) video streams, from an Amazon S3 bucket containing video data to endpoints accessible to a Docker image, which, when run, will process the input video streams and emit some JSON statistics.
The 25 video streams should be synchronized. Could people share their experiences with a similar scenario and perhaps offer advice about which is better (Wowza, Amazon Kinesis Video Streams) for this kind of problem, or why they chose one technology over the other?
The video stream duration will be quite long (about 8 hours each x 25 camera sources). The 25 video streams will have no audio component. If you worked with a similar problem, what was your experience with scaling, latency, resource requirements, config, etc.?
We want to make a live streaming platform demo to show off our video compression technology.
Simply put, we will stream content from 12 x 4K cameras ——> to an edge server(s) containing our compression software ——> either to Bitmovin or Wowza ——> to a media player.
What we would like to know is, is one of the above streaming engines more suited to multiple feeds (we will eventually be using more than 100 4K cameras for the actual streaming platform), 4K content streaming, latency, and functions such as being to Zoom in on the 4K content?
If anyone has any insight into the above, we would be grateful for your advice. We are a Japanese company and were recommended the above two streaming engines but know nothing about them as they literally “foreign” to us.
Thanks so much.
WebRTC
- OpenSource3
- No Download2
- You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc1
related WebRTC posts
Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema
I am trying to implement video calling in a React Native app through Amazon Kinesis. But I was unlucky to find anything related to this on the web. Do you have any example code I can use? or any tutorial? If not, how easy is it to bridge the native library to RN? And what should I use WebRTC or Amazon Chime?? Thanks
- Ease of use2
- Cross Platform1
- Open Source1
related GStreamer posts
I have a situation to convert the H264 streams into MP4 format using FFMPEG/GStreamer.
However Im stuck with the gst-ugly plugin, now trying my luck with ffmeg. How big are the ffmeg libs and licensing complications?
related Mediasoup posts
- Easy to use505
- Gmail integration326
- Enough free space312
- Collaboration268
- Stable service249
- Desktop and mobile apps128
- Offline sync97
- Apps79
- 15 gb storage74
- Add-ons50
- Integrates well9
- Easy to use6
- Simple back-up tool3
- Amazing2
- Beautiful2
- Fast upload speeds2
- The more the merrier2
- So easy2
- Wonderful2
- Linux terminal transfer tools2
- It has grown to a stable in the cloud office2
- UI1
- Windows desktop1
- G Suite integration1
- Organization via web ui sucks7
- Not a real database2
related Google Drive posts
Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.
I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?
Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?
- Easy setup, great cdn424
- Free ssl277
- Easy setup199
- Security190
- Ssl180
- Great cdn98
- Optimizer77
- Simple71
- Great UI44
- Great js cdn28
- Apps12
- HTTP/2 Support12
- DNS Analytics12
- AutoMinify12
- Rocket Loader9
- Ipv69
- Easy9
- IPv6 "One Click"8
- Fantastic CDN service8
- DNSSEC7
- Nice DNS7
- SSHFP7
- Free GeoIP7
- Amazing performance7
- API7
- Cheapest SSL7
- SPDY6
- Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else6
- Ubuntu5
- Asynchronous resource loading5
- Global Load Balancing4
- Performance4
- Easy Use4
- CDN3
- Registrar2
- Support for SSHFP records2
- Web31
- Прохси1
- HTTPS3/Quic1
- No support for SSHFP records2
- Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits2
related CloudFlare posts
Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.
When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.
One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.
Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.
When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.
I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.
- Easy to work with434
- Free256
- Popular216
- Shared file hosting176
- 'just works'167
- No brainer100
- Integration with external services79
- Simple76
- Good api49
- Least cost (free) for the basic needs case38
- It just works11
- Convenient8
- Accessible from all of my devices7
- Command Line client5
- Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere4
- Can even be used by your grandma4
- Reliable3
- Sync API3
- Mac app3
- Cross platform app3
- Ability to pay monthly without losing your files2
- Delta synchronization2
- Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably2
- Backups, local and cloud2
- Extended version history2
- Beautiful UI2
- YC Company1
- What a beautiful app1
- Easy/no setup1
- So easy1
- The more the merrier1
- Easy to work with1
- For when client needs file without opening firewall1
- Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl1
- Easy to use1
- Official Linux app1
- The more the merrier0
- Personal vs company account is confusing3
- Replication kills CPU and battery1
related Dropbox posts
I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?
Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?
Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers