Alternatives to Lazarus logo

Alternatives to Lazarus

Delphi, Qt, Python, Visual Studio, and IntelliJ IDEA are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Lazarus.
17
22
+ 1
22

What is Lazarus and what are its top alternatives?

It is a Delphi compatible cross-platform IDE for Rapid Application Development. It has variety of components ready for use and a graphical form designer to easily create complex graphical user interfaces.
Lazarus is a tool in the Integrated Development Environment category of a tech stack.
Lazarus is an open source tool with 355 GitHub stars and 93 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Lazarus's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Lazarus

  • Delphi

    Delphi

    It is an integrated development environment (IDE) for rapid application development of desktop, mobile, web, and console software. ...

  • Qt

    Qt

    Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets. ...

  • Python

    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Visual Studio

    Visual Studio

    Visual Studio is a suite of component-based software development tools and other technologies for building powerful, high-performance applications. ...

  • IntelliJ IDEA

    IntelliJ IDEA

    Out of the box, IntelliJ IDEA provides a comprehensive feature set including tools and integrations with the most important modern technologies and frameworks for enterprise and web development with Java, Scala, Groovy and other languages. ...

  • PyCharm

    PyCharm

    PyCharm’s smart code editor provides first-class support for Python, JavaScript, CoffeeScript, TypeScript, CSS, popular template languages and more. Take advantage of language-aware code completion, error detection, and on-the-fly code fixes! ...

  • Android Studio

    Android Studio

    Android Studio is a new Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA. It provides new features and improvements over Eclipse ADT and will be the official Android IDE once it's ready. ...

  • Xcode

    Xcode

    The Xcode IDE is at the center of the Apple development experience. Tightly integrated with the Cocoa and Cocoa Touch frameworks, Xcode is an incredibly productive environment for building amazing apps for Mac, iPhone, and iPad. ...

Lazarus alternatives & related posts

Delphi logo

Delphi

183
141
23
An IDE for Creating Cross-Platform, Natively Compiled Apps
183
141
+ 1
23
PROS OF DELPHI
  • 8
    Performance
  • 8
    Fast Developing
  • 3
    Cross-platform
  • 2
    Hardware level
  • 2
    Low-Level
CONS OF DELPHI
  • 4
    Big Apps
  • 2
    Web Application

related Delphi posts

Arthur Henrique Della Fraga
Software Solution Architect · | 4 upvotes · 7.1K views
Shared insights
on
LazarusLazarusDelphiDelphi

I just got into a new job at an organization that develops Windows applications in Object Pascal.

Delphi 10.3 is the most common IDE being used between developers here. However my first impressions of it weren't the best and reading I found Lazarus as an alternative, but haven't installed it yet. I'm pretty new in Object Pascal development and I already need to learn a bunch of things, but it doesn't scare me, so it would be nice to go forward with a good IDE choice.

I'm not sure these options are simply interchangeable, since Wikipedia says Lazarus is "for programmers developing with the Object Pascal language, which is as close as possible to Delphi". Any thoughts would be very welcome! Thanks very much.

See more
Qt logo

Qt

332
448
74
A leading cross-platform application and UI framework
332
448
+ 1
74
PROS OF QT
  • 11
    High Performance
  • 9
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 9
    Performance
  • 8
    Cross platform
  • 6
    Up to date framework
  • 6
    Easiest integration with C++
  • 6
    Fast prototyping
  • 4
    Safe 2D Renderer
  • 4
    Python
  • 3
    Multiple license including Open Source and Commercial
  • 3
    Great Community Support
  • 3
    HW Accelerated UI
  • 2
    JIT and QML Compiler
  • 0
    Game Engine like UI system
  • 0
    From high to low level coding
  • 0
    Easy Integrating to DX and OpenGL and Vulkan
  • 0
    True cross-platform framework with native code compile
  • 0
    Been using it since the 90s - runs anywhere does it all
  • 0
    Great mobile support with Felgo add-on
CONS OF QT
  • 4
    Paid
  • 4
    C++ is not so productive
  • 1
    Lack of libraries
  • 1
    Not detailed documentation
  • 1
    Lack of community support

related Qt posts

Python logo

Python

152.3K
124.8K
6.5K
A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
152.3K
124.8K
+ 1
6.5K
PROS OF PYTHON
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 933
    Readable code
  • 824
    Beautiful code
  • 772
    Rapid development
  • 674
    Large community
  • 420
    Open source
  • 380
    Elegant
  • 270
    Great community
  • 262
    Object oriented
  • 209
    Dynamic typing
  • 71
    Great standard library
  • 53
    Very fast
  • 50
    Functional programming
  • 37
    Scientific computing
  • 36
    Easy to learn
  • 31
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Matlab alternative
  • 23
    Productivity
  • 23
    Easy to read
  • 20
    Simple is better than complex
  • 18
    It's the way I think
  • 17
    Imperative
  • 15
    Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
  • 15
    Free
  • 14
    Powerfull language
  • 14
    Powerful
  • 13
    Fast and simple
  • 12
    Scripting
  • 11
    Machine learning support
  • 9
    Explicit is better than implicit
  • 8
    Ease of development
  • 8
    Unlimited power
  • 8
    Clear and easy and powerfull
  • 7
    Import antigravity
  • 6
    Print "life is short, use python"
  • 6
    It's lean and fun to code
  • 5
    Fast coding and good for competitions
  • 5
    Flat is better than nested
  • 5
    There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
  • 5
    Python has great libraries for data processing
  • 5
    High Documented language
  • 5
    I love snakes
  • 5
    Although practicality beats purity
  • 5
    Great for tooling
  • 4
    Readability counts
  • 3
    Plotting
  • 3
    CG industry needs
  • 3
    Beautiful is better than ugly
  • 3
    Complex is better than complicated
  • 3
    Great for analytics
  • 3
    Multiple Inheritence
  • 3
    Now is better than never
  • 3
    Lists, tuples, dictionaries
  • 3
    Rapid Prototyping
  • 3
    Socially engaged community
  • 2
    List comprehensions
  • 2
    Web scraping
  • 2
    Many types of collections
  • 2
    Ys
  • 2
    Easy to setup and run smooth
  • 2
    Generators
  • 2
    Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
  • 2
    If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
  • 2
    If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
  • 2
    Simple and easy to learn
  • 2
    Import this
  • 2
    No cruft
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 1
    Better outcome
  • 1
    It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
  • 1
    Powerful language for AI
  • 1
    Should START with this but not STICK with This
  • 1
    Flexible and easy
  • 1
    Batteries included
  • 1
    Good
  • 1
    A-to-Z
  • 1
    Only one way to do it
  • 1
    Because of Netflix
  • 1
    Pip install everything
  • 0
    Powerful
  • 0
    Pro
CONS OF PYTHON
  • 51
    Still divided between python 2 and python 3
  • 29
    Performance impact
  • 26
    Poor syntax for anonymous functions
  • 21
    GIL
  • 19
    Package management is a mess
  • 14
    Too imperative-oriented
  • 12
    Dynamic typing
  • 12
    Hard to understand
  • 10
    Very slow
  • 8
    Not everything is expression
  • 7
    Indentations matter a lot
  • 7
    Explicit self parameter in methods
  • 6
    No anonymous functions
  • 6
    Poor DSL capabilities
  • 6
    Incredibly slow
  • 6
    Requires C functions for dynamic modules
  • 5
    The "lisp style" whitespaces
  • 5
    Fake object-oriented programming
  • 5
    Hard to obfuscate
  • 5
    Threading
  • 4
    Circular import
  • 4
    The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
  • 4
    Official documentation is unclear.
  • 4
    Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
  • 4
    Not suitable for autocomplete
  • 2
    Meta classes
  • 1
    Training wheels (forced indentation)

related Python posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 39 upvotes · 4.2M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Nick Parsons
Director of Developer Marketing at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 1.4M views

Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

#FrameworksFullStack #Languages

See more
Visual Studio logo

Visual Studio

32.1K
25.1K
1.1K
State-of-the-art tools and services that you can use to create great apps for devices, the cloud, and everything...
32.1K
25.1K
+ 1
1.1K
PROS OF VISUAL STUDIO
  • 299
    Intellisense, ui
  • 239
    Complete ide and debugger
  • 162
    Plug-ins
  • 101
    Integrated
  • 92
    Documentation
  • 35
    Fast
  • 34
    Node tools for visual studio (ntvs)
  • 30
    Free Community edition
  • 23
    Simple
  • 17
    Bug free
  • 7
    Made by Microsoft
  • 5
    Full free community version
  • 3
    Productivity Power Tools
  • 3
    JetBrains plugins (ReSharper etc.) work sufficiently OK
  • 2
    VIM integration
  • 2
    Vim mode
  • 1
    I develop UWP apps and Intellisense is super useful
  • 1
    The Power and Easiness to Do anything in any.. language
CONS OF VISUAL STUDIO
  • 14
    Bulky
  • 12
    Made by Microsoft
  • 3
    Only avalible on Windows
  • 2
    Sometimes you need to restart to finish an update
  • 1
    Too much size for disk

related Visual Studio posts

Nicholas Rogoff

Secure Membership Web API backed by SQL Server. This is the backing API to store additional profile and complex membership metadata outside of an Azure AD B2C provider. The front-end using the Azure AD B2C to allow 3rd party trusted identity providers to authenticate. This API provides a way to add and manage more complex permission structures than can easily be maintained in Azure AD.

We have .Net developers and an Azure infrastructure environment using server-less functions, logic apps and SaaS where ever possible. For this service I opted to keep it as a classic WebAPI project and deployed to AppService.

  • Trusted Authentication Provider: @AzureActiveDirectoryB2C
  • Frameworks: .NET Core
  • Language: C# , Microsoft SQL Server , JavaScript
  • IDEs: Visual Studio Code , Visual Studio
  • Libraries: jQuery @EntityFramework, @AutoMapper, @FeatureToggle , @Swashbuckle
  • Database: @SqlAzure
  • Source Control: Git
  • Build and Release Pipelines: Azure DevOps
  • Test tools: Postman , Newman
  • Test framework: @nUnit, @moq
  • Infrastructure: @AzureAppService, @AzureAPIManagement
See more
Maria Naggaga
Senior Program Manager - .NET Team at Microsoft · | 7 upvotes · 381.5K views

.NET Core is #free, #cross-platform, and #opensource. A developer platform for building all types of apps ( #web apps #mobile #games #machinelearning #AI and #Desktop ).

Developers have chosen .NET for:

Productive: Combined with the extensive class libraries, common APIs, multi-language support, and the powerful tooling provided by the Visual Studio family ( Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code ), .NET is the most productive platform for developers.

Any app: From mobile applications running on iOS, Android and Windows, to Enterprise server applications running on Windows Server and Linux, or high-scale microservices running in the cloud, .NET provides a solution for you.

Performance: .NET is fast. Really fast! The popular TechEmpower benchmark compares web application frameworks with tasks like JSON serialization, database access, and server side template rendering - .NET performs faster than any other popular framework.

See more
IntelliJ IDEA logo

IntelliJ IDEA

30.2K
24.1K
1.5K
Capable and Ergonomic IDE for JVM
30.2K
24.1K
+ 1
1.5K
PROS OF INTELLIJ IDEA
  • 297
    Fantastically intelligent
  • 243
    Best-in-class ide
  • 190
    Many languages support
  • 156
    Java
  • 121
    Fast
  • 82
    Code analysis
  • 78
    Reliable
  • 76
    Out of the box integration with maven, git, svn
  • 64
    Plugin architecture
  • 61
    Integrated version control
  • 12
    Code refactoring support
  • 11
    Best java IDE
  • 7
    Local history
  • 6
    Code Completion
  • 6
    Built-in terminal/run tools
  • 6
    Integrated Database Navigator
  • 5
    Free If you're a Student
  • 5
    Kotlin
  • 5
    All
  • 5
    Free for open-source development, students and teacher
  • 4
    Base for Android Studio
  • 4
    Database/Code integration
  • 4
    Cross platform
  • 4
    IDE
  • 4
    ERD Diagrams
  • 3
    Live Templates
  • 3
    Free
  • 3
    Server and client-side debugger
  • 3
    More than enough languages for any developer
  • 3
    Typescript support
  • 3
    Multicursor support
  • 3
    Reformating Code
  • 3
    Intuitive
  • 3
    Command-line tools
  • 3
    Android Integration
  • 3
    Out Of The Box features
  • 3
    Vim support
  • 3
    Special icons for most filetypes in project list
  • 3
    Supports many frameworks
  • 3
    Built-in web server
  • 3
    Scala support
  • 2
    Full support
  • 2
    Task managers
  • 2
    Diff tools
  • 2
    File Watchers
  • 2
    Support for various package managers
  • 2
    Integrated Code Linting
  • 2
    Its fake intellisense is better than real IntelliSense
  • 2
    Clean UI
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Column Selection Mode
  • 2
    So modernised
  • 2
    Efficient, one Stop solution
  • 2
    Integrated Ssh/Ftp Managers
  • 2
    Just works
  • 2
    A lot of plugin
  • 2
    Works fine with mac os catalina
CONS OF INTELLIJ IDEA
  • 18
    Large footprint required to really enjoy (mem/disc)
  • 14
    Very slow
  • 7
    Bad for beginners
  • 6
    UI is not intuitive
  • 5
    Not nearly as many tools to integrate as vs code
  • 4
    Constant reindexing
  • 3
    Needs a lot of CPU and RAM power
  • 2
    Built in terminal is slow
  • 2
    Doesn't work that well with windows 10 edu
  • 1
    Ruby is a plug in
  • 1
    Pesky warnings increase with every release
  • 0
    AAD

related IntelliJ IDEA posts

christy craemer

UPDATE: Thanks for the great response. I am going to start with VSCode based on the open source and free version that will allow me to grow into other languages, but not cost me a license ..yet.

I have been working with software development for 12 years, but I am just beginning my journey to learn to code. I am starting with Python following the suggestion of some of my coworkers. They are split between Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA for IDEs that they use and PyCharm is new to me. Which IDE would you suggest for a beginner that will allow expansion to Java, JavaScript, and eventually AngularJS and possibly mobile applications?

See more
Andrey Kurdyumov

I use Visual Studio because it provides me best default configuration for development. Less choice helps me concentrate on the product. In a sense it is iPhone of software development for me. When my laptop broke, I just download latest version of VS and start coding without any configuration. For sure it has best editor in terms of perceived responsiveness. Could not say the same for IntelliJ IDEA unfortunately.

See more
PyCharm logo

PyCharm

18.4K
14.9K
422
The Most Intelligent Python IDE
18.4K
14.9K
+ 1
422
PROS OF PYCHARM
  • 104
    Smart auto-completion
  • 88
    Intelligent code analysis
  • 74
    Powerful refactoring
  • 57
    Virtualenv integration
  • 50
    Git integration
  • 20
    Support for Django
  • 9
    Multi-database integration
  • 7
    VIM integration
  • 4
    Vagrant integration
  • 3
    In-tool Bash and Python shell
  • 2
    Docker
  • 2
    Plugin architecture
  • 1
    Perforce integration
  • 1
    Debug mode support docker
CONS OF PYCHARM
  • 8
    Slow startup
  • 5
    Not very flexible
  • 4
    Resource hog
  • 2
    Periodic slow menu response

related PyCharm posts

christy craemer

UPDATE: Thanks for the great response. I am going to start with VSCode based on the open source and free version that will allow me to grow into other languages, but not cost me a license ..yet.

I have been working with software development for 12 years, but I am just beginning my journey to learn to code. I am starting with Python following the suggestion of some of my coworkers. They are split between Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA for IDEs that they use and PyCharm is new to me. Which IDE would you suggest for a beginner that will allow expansion to Java, JavaScript, and eventually AngularJS and possibly mobile applications?

See more

I am a QA heading to a new company where they all generally use Visual Studio Code, my experience is with IntelliJ IDEA and PyCharm. The language they use is JavaScript and so I will be writing my test framework in javaScript so the devs can more easily write tests without context switching.

My 2 questions: Does VS Code have Cucumber Plugins allowing me to write behave tests? And more importantly, does VS Code have the same refactoring tools that IntelliJ IDEA has? I love that I have easy access to a range of tools that allow me to refactor and simplify my code, making code writing really easy.

See more
Android Studio logo

Android Studio

18K
13.7K
355
Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA
18K
13.7K
+ 1
355
PROS OF ANDROID STUDIO
  • 173
    Android studio is a great tool, getting better and bet
  • 101
    Google's official android ide
  • 35
    Intelligent code editor with lots of auto-completion
  • 25
    Its powerful and robust
  • 5
    Easy creating android app
  • 3
    Amazing Layout Designer
  • 3
    Great Code Tips
  • 3
    Great tool & very helpful
  • 2
    Built in Emulator
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Keyboard Shortcuts are Amazing Out of the box
  • 1
    Cc
CONS OF ANDROID STUDIO
  • 4
    Huge memory usage
  • 4
    Slow emulator
  • 2
    Complex for begginers
  • 2
    No checking incompatibilities
  • 1
    Using Intellij IDEA, while Intellij IDEA have too
  • 1
    Lags behind IntelliJ IDEA
  • 1
    Slow release process

related Android Studio posts

Gustavo Muñoz
Senior Software Engineer at JOOR · | 8 upvotes · 380.8K views

In my modest opinion, Flutter is the future of mobile development. The framework is as important to mobile as React is to the web. And seeing that React Native does not finish taking off, I am focusing all my efforts on learning Flutter and Dart. The ecosystem is amazing. The community is crazy about Flutter. There are enough resources to learn and enjoy the framework, and the tools developed to work with it are amazing. Android Studio or Visual Studio Code has incredible plugins and Dart is a pretty straight forward and easy-to-learn language, even more, if you came from JavaScript. I admit it. I'm in love with Flutter. When you are not a designer, having a framework focused on design an pretty things is a must. And counting with tools like #flare for animations makes everything easier. It is so amazing that I wish I had a big mobile project right now at work just to use Flutter.

See more
Julien DeFrance
Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 8 upvotes · 331.1K views

As a Engineering Manager & Director at SmartZip, I had a mix of front-end, back-end, #mobile engineers reporting to me.

Sprints after sprints, I noticed some inefficiencies on the MobileDev side. People working multiple sprints in a row on their Xcode / Objective-C codebase while some others were working on Android Studio. After which, QA & Product ensured both applications were in sync, on a UI/UX standpoint, creating addional work, which also happened to be extremely costly.

Our resources being so limited, my role was to stop this bleeding and keep my team productive and their time, valuable.

After some analysis, discussions, proof of concepts... etc. We decided to move to a single codebase using React Native so our velocity would increase.

After some initial investment, our initial assumptions were confirmed and we indeed started to ship features a lot faster than ever before. Also, our engineers found a way to perform this upgrade incrementally, so the initial platform-specific codebase wouldn't have to entirely be rewritten at once but only gradually and at will.

Feedback around React Native was very positive. And I doubt - for the kind of application we had - no one would want to go back to two or more code bases. Our application was still as Native as it gets. And no feature or device capability was compromised.

See more
Xcode logo

Xcode

14K
10.2K
209
The complete toolset for building great apps
14K
10.2K
+ 1
209
PROS OF XCODE
  • 129
    IOS Development
  • 32
    Personal assistant on steroids
  • 29
    Easy setup
  • 17
    Excellent integration with Clang
  • 1
    Beautiful
  • 1
    Built-in everything
  • 0
    Con
CONS OF XCODE
  • 4
    Massively bloated and complicated for smaller projects
  • 2
    Horrible auto completiting and text editing
  • 1
    Very slow emulator

related Xcode posts

Julien DeFrance
Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 8 upvotes · 331.1K views

As a Engineering Manager & Director at SmartZip, I had a mix of front-end, back-end, #mobile engineers reporting to me.

Sprints after sprints, I noticed some inefficiencies on the MobileDev side. People working multiple sprints in a row on their Xcode / Objective-C codebase while some others were working on Android Studio. After which, QA & Product ensured both applications were in sync, on a UI/UX standpoint, creating addional work, which also happened to be extremely costly.

Our resources being so limited, my role was to stop this bleeding and keep my team productive and their time, valuable.

After some analysis, discussions, proof of concepts... etc. We decided to move to a single codebase using React Native so our velocity would increase.

After some initial investment, our initial assumptions were confirmed and we indeed started to ship features a lot faster than ever before. Also, our engineers found a way to perform this upgrade incrementally, so the initial platform-specific codebase wouldn't have to entirely be rewritten at once but only gradually and at will.

Feedback around React Native was very positive. And I doubt - for the kind of application we had - no one would want to go back to two or more code bases. Our application was still as Native as it gets. And no feature or device capability was compromised.

See more
Sezgi Ulucam
Developer Advocate at Hasura · | 7 upvotes · 668.8K views

I've recently switched to using Expo for initializing and developing my React Native apps. Compared to React Native CLI, it's so much easier to get set up and going. Setting up and maintaining Android Studio, Android SDK, and virtual devices used to be such a headache. Thanks to Expo, I can now test my apps directly on my Android phone, just by installing the Expo app. I still use Xcode Simulator for iOS testing, since I don't have an iPhone, but that's easy anyway. The big win for me with Expo is ease of Android testing.

The Expo SDK also provides convenient features like Facebook login, MapView, push notifications, and many others. https://docs.expo.io/versions/v31.0.0/sdk/

See more