LoadNinja vs Loader.io

Overview

Loader.io

Stacks71

Followers173

Votes18

LoadNinja

Stacks12

Followers40

Votes0

LoadNinja vs Loader.io: What are the differences?

Cost: LoadNinja is a paid tool that requires a subscription, while Loader.io offers a free tier with limited features as well as paid plans for more advanced functionality. LoadNinja provides a more comprehensive set of features but at a cost, whereas Loader.io is ideal for smaller projects or those on a tight budget.
Scripting Capabilities: LoadNinja offers a codeless scripting approach, allowing users to create and edit test scripts without needing to code. On the other hand, Loader.io requires users to write custom scripts in popular programming languages such as Python or JavaScript. This difference makes LoadNinja more user-friendly for non-technical users, while Loader.io is preferred by those with coding experience.
Real Browser-Based Testing: LoadNinja specializes in real browser-based load testing, simulating user interactions accurately. In contrast, Loader.io focuses more on API testing and does not offer the same level of detailed browser simulation. If your testing requirements involve complex web applications with various user interactions, LoadNinja may be a better fit.
Integrations: LoadNinja provides seamless integration with popular tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and Slack for efficient test execution and result reporting. Loader.io, on the other hand, offers integrations with services like PagerDuty and Zapier but may not have as extensive integration options as LoadNinja. Depending on your existing toolset, one of the platforms may be easier to integrate into your workflow.
Reporting and Analytics: LoadNinja boasts advanced reporting capabilities with detailed insights into performance metrics and actionable analytics. Loader.io provides basic performance metrics but may not offer the same level of in-depth analysis and customization options. If detailed performance reports are crucial for your testing process, LoadNinja may be the better choice.
User Interface: LoadNinja features a user-friendly and intuitive interface that simplifies the load testing process, making it easy for beginners to get started. Loader.io, while functional, may have a steeper learning curve due to its more technical approach and interface design. Depending on your team's expertise and the learning curve you are willing to tolerate, one platform may be more suitable than the other.

In Summary, LoadNinja offers comprehensive features and ease of use but comes at a cost, while Loader.io provides a free tier option with a focus on API testing and less detailed browser simulation capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Loader.io, LoadNinja

Ratan

QA Manager at Verisys

Feb 12, 2020

Needs advice

I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?

36.3k views36.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Loader.io	LoadNinja
Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.	It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.
Share Graphs and Stats- anytime, anywhere;GUI or API- load test how you want	Reduce Test Script Creation Time by 60%; Generate Load with 1000s of Real Browsers; Analyze in Real-Time with VU Inspector and Debugger; Manage Your Performance Tests Efficiently & Effectively; Data-Drive Load Tests for Full Test Coverage; Test Applications in Local Network
Statistics
Stacks 71	Stacks 12
Followers 173	Followers 40
Votes 18	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Easy to use 6 Free tier 3 Heroku add-on	No community feedback yet
Integrations
cloudControl	Jenkins Zephyr

What are some alternatives to Loader.io, LoadNinja?

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

BlazeMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Apache JMeter

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

Artillery

It is a modern, open-source, powerful & easy-to-use performance testing toolkit. Use it to ship scalable applications that stay performant & resilient under high load. It prioritizes developer productivity and happiness and follows the “batteries-included” philosophy.

Related Comparisons

LoadNinja vs Loader.io: What are the differences?

Cost: LoadNinja is a paid tool that requires a subscription, while Loader.io offers a free tier with limited features as well as paid plans for more advanced functionality. LoadNinja provides a more comprehensive set of features but at a cost, whereas Loader.io is ideal for smaller projects or those on a tight budget.
Scripting Capabilities: LoadNinja offers a codeless scripting approach, allowing users to create and edit test scripts without needing to code. On the other hand, Loader.io requires users to write custom scripts in popular programming languages such as Python or JavaScript. This difference makes LoadNinja more user-friendly for non-technical users, while Loader.io is preferred by those with coding experience.
Real Browser-Based Testing: LoadNinja specializes in real browser-based load testing, simulating user interactions accurately. In contrast, Loader.io focuses more on API testing and does not offer the same level of detailed browser simulation. If your testing requirements involve complex web applications with various user interactions, LoadNinja may be a better fit.
Integrations: LoadNinja provides seamless integration with popular tools like Jenkins, Bamboo, and Slack for efficient test execution and result reporting. Loader.io, on the other hand, offers integrations with services like PagerDuty and Zapier but may not have as extensive integration options as LoadNinja. Depending on your existing toolset, one of the platforms may be easier to integrate into your workflow.
Reporting and Analytics: LoadNinja boasts advanced reporting capabilities with detailed insights into performance metrics and actionable analytics. Loader.io provides basic performance metrics but may not offer the same level of in-depth analysis and customization options. If detailed performance reports are crucial for your testing process, LoadNinja may be the better choice.
User Interface: LoadNinja features a user-friendly and intuitive interface that simplifies the load testing process, making it easy for beginners to get started. Loader.io, while functional, may have a steeper learning curve due to its more technical approach and interface design. Depending on your team's expertise and the learning curve you are willing to tolerate, one platform may be more suitable than the other.

LoadNinja vs Loader.io

Overview