StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. MapD vs Oracle PL/SQL

MapD vs Oracle PL/SQL

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MapD
MapD
Stacks32
Followers24
Votes4
Oracle PL/SQL
Oracle PL/SQL
Stacks749
Followers598
Votes8

MapD vs Oracle PL/SQL: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between MapD and Oracle PL/SQL:

  1. Architecture: MapD is an open-source database management system that uses GPU acceleration to speed up data analytics processing, while Oracle PL/SQL is a procedural language extension for Oracle databases. The architecture of MapD allows for fast querying and visualization of large datasets due to its GPU utilization, whereas Oracle PL/SQL focuses on procedural programming within the Oracle database environment.

  2. Performance: MapD is known for its faster query performance compared to Oracle PL/SQL, especially when dealing with complex analytics and large datasets. The GPU acceleration in MapD enables parallel processing and faster data retrieval, making it a preferred choice for tasks requiring high-speed data processing. On the other hand, Oracle PL/SQL, while robust in terms of database management and procedural programming, may not offer the same level of performance for data analytics tasks as MapD.

  3. Use Cases: MapD is typically used for interactive data exploration, visualization, and real-time analytics where speed is crucial, such as in financial services, retail, and telecommunications industries. On the other hand, Oracle PL/SQL is commonly used for developing stored procedures, triggers, and functions within the Oracle database environment for tasks like data manipulation, transaction control, and security enforcement.

  4. Scalability: MapD is designed to scale horizontally by adding more nodes to distribute the workload efficiently across multiple servers, allowing for increased processing power and storage capacity as needed. Oracle PL/SQL, being part of the Oracle database system, can also scale horizontally with Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) for high availability and scalability, but may not offer the same level of flexibility in terms of scaling out as MapD.

  5. Cost: MapD, being open-source, offers a cost-effective solution for businesses looking to leverage GPU acceleration for data analytics without incurring high licensing fees. On the other hand, Oracle PL/SQL, as part of the Oracle database ecosystem, may involve licensing costs based on the features and options used, making it potentially more expensive for organizations with complex database requirements.

  6. Community Support: MapD, being open-source, benefits from a vibrant community of developers and users who contribute to its development, provide support, and share resources for optimizing performance and usage. Oracle PL/SQL, being a proprietary language for Oracle databases, relies on Oracle's support resources, documentation, and training programs, which may require additional investment for accessing expert assistance and guidance.

In Summary, MapD and Oracle PL/SQL differ in architecture, performance, use cases, scalability, cost, and community support, catering to distinct needs in data analytics and database management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MapD
MapD
Oracle PL/SQL
Oracle PL/SQL

Interactively query and visualize massive datasets with the parallel power of GPUs.

It is a powerful, yet straightforward database programming language. It is easy to both write and read, and comes packed with lots of out-of-the-box optimizations and security features.

SQL; GPU-powered; column store; fast; scalable; interactive visualization; machine learning
-
Statistics
Stacks
32
Stacks
749
Followers
24
Followers
598
Votes
4
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Super fast, and the approach taken
  • 1
    Hehe
Pros
  • 2
    Multiple ways to accomplish the same end
  • 2
    Powerful
  • 1
    Extensible to external langiages
  • 1
    Not mysql
  • 1
    Pl/sql
Cons
  • 2
    High commercial license cost
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
Kafka
Kafka
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
IBM DB2
IBM DB2
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Oracle
Oracle
Python
Python
PHP
PHP
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Oracle
Oracle
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to MapD, Oracle PL/SQL?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

GraphQL

GraphQL

GraphQL is a data query language and runtime designed and used at Facebook to request and deliver data to mobile and web apps since 2012.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase