StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material UI vs Semantic UI

Material UI vs Semantic UI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445

Material UI vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Material UI and Semantic UI are both popular front-end development libraries that provide pre-built components for creating user interfaces. While both libraries have similar goals of making it easier to build attractive and user-friendly UIs, there are some key differences between them.

  1. Design Philosophy: Material UI, as its name suggests, follows the principles of Material Design, a design language developed by Google. It focuses on creating interfaces that resemble physical materials and provide a consistent look and feel across different platforms. On the other hand, Semantic UI places a strong emphasis on using natural language principles to create intuitive and readable code, with the goal of making it easier to understand and maintain.

  2. Component Styles: Material UI offers a wide range of pre-built components with a distinct visual style that closely matches the Material Design guidelines. These components have consistent colors, shadows, and shapes, creating a cohesive look throughout the application. Semantic UI, on the other hand, provides more visually expressive components with unique designs and styles. It allows for more customization options, but the resulting UI may not be as consistent across different sections of the application.

  3. Customization Flexibility: Material UI provides a theming system that allows developers to customize the appearance of components, such as changing colors, typography, and spacing. It also supports overriding individual components' styles. Semantic UI, on the other hand, offers a variety of preset themes that can be easily applied to the entire application, but customization options for individual components may be more limited.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Material UI has a large and active community as it is widely used in the React ecosystem. This means there are many resources, tutorials, and community-driven libraries and tools available to help developers. Semantic UI also has a decent community but may not be as widely adopted as Material UI, so the available resources and community support may be comparatively smaller.

  5. Documentation: Material UI has comprehensive and well-organized documentation, providing detailed information about each component along with examples and usage guidelines. It also includes guidance on implementing Material Design principles effectively. Semantic UI's documentation is also extensive, but it may not be as structured or comprehensive as Material UI's documentation.

  6. Integration with Frameworks: Material UI is primarily designed for use with React, and it integrates seamlessly with React applications. It provides React-specific features like hooks and context, making it convenient for React developers. Semantic UI, on the other hand, supports multiple frameworks, including React, Angular, and Vue. This flexibility allows developers to use Semantic UI regardless of their preferred framework.

In summary, Material UI follows the principles of Material Design, providing consistent and visually appealing components, while Semantic UI focuses on using natural language principles to create intuitive code. Material UI has a larger community and extensive documentation, while Semantic UI offers more customization options and supports multiple frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Semantic UI, Material-UI

Kexin
Kexin

Mar 4, 2021

Decided

I replaced Bootstrap with Material-UI during the front-end UI development, because Material-UI adopts a component-based importing style, making it suit well in a "React programming style". This makes me comfortable when programming because I can treat importing UI components as other React components I define.

281k views281k
Comments
Kabir
Kabir

Nov 29, 2021

Review

I don't recommend that you use Vue but that is just my biased opinion for react against vue. If you want a better user experience, use Next.js server side rendering. You will need to use Web Assembly to compile your unity 3d game on the web. DO NOT use html, css and js for your game. I recommend you use a tailwind UI kit, Chakra UI or material UI.

16.2k views16.2k
Comments
Kwasi
Kwasi

CTO

Feb 23, 2021

Review

You can choose between Angular Material or PrimeNG, if you have experience in integrating third party javascript libs you can use SemanticUI , Bootstrap or Foundation. All above UI Frameworks support side navigation with off page canavas implementation.

9.27k views9.27k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Material-UI
Material-UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
992
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
3.7K
Votes
673
Votes
445
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    Extra library needed for date/time pickers
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
styled-components
styled-components
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Material-UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase