StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Apache Maven vs Pants

Apache Maven vs Pants

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes414
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks2.8K
Pants
Pants
Stacks23
Followers86
Votes30
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks674

Apache Maven vs Pants: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Maven and Pants are both build automation tools commonly used for software development projects. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Dependency Management: Maven uses a centralized approach to manage project dependencies, where dependencies are declared in a single configuration file (pom.xml). Pants, on the other hand, uses a decentralized approach, with dependencies declared within each individual target file. This allows developers using Pants to have more control over their dependencies at a granular level.

  2. Build System: Maven follows a convention-over-configuration approach, where it provides a predefined project structure and build lifecycle. Pants, on the other hand, emphasizes flexibility and configurability, allowing developers to define their own build system and customize it according to their project requirements.

  3. Language Support: Maven is primarily focused on Java projects, although it does support other programming languages to some extent. Pants, on the other hand, was developed with polyglot build support in mind, offering a more seamless experience for multi-language projects. It provides native support for languages such as Java, Python, Scala, and more.

  4. Incremental Compilation: Maven performs a full compilation every time the project is built, regardless of whether changes have been made to the source code. Pants, on the other hand, leverages a novel dependency analysis engine called Zinc, which allows for incremental compilation. This means that only the necessary parts of the project are rebuilt when changes are made, resulting in faster build times.

  5. IDE Integration: While both Maven and Pants integrate well with popular IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA and Eclipse, Maven's integration is more mature and widespread. This is because Maven has been around for a longer time and has gained wider adoption within the Java ecosystem. Pants, on the other hand, is relatively newer and may offer a more limited range of IDE integrations.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: The Maven ecosystem is well-established and has a large community of users and contributors. This means that there are a vast number of plugins and resources available for Maven, making it easier for developers to find solutions to common build challenges. While Pants also has a growing community, it may not offer the same level of maturity and breadth of resources as Maven.

In summary, Apache Maven and Pants differ in their approach to dependency management, build system, language support, incremental compilation, IDE integration, and community ecosystem. These differences make each tool more suitable for specific project requirements and development scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Pants
Pants

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
Builds Java, Scala, and Python.;Adding support for new languages is straightforward.;Supports code generation: thrift, protocol buffers, custom code generators.;Resolves external JVM and Python dependencies.;Runs tests.;Spawns Python and Scala REPLs with appropriate load paths.;Creates deployable packages.;Scales to large repos with many interdependent modules.;Designed for incremental builds.;Support for local and distributed caching.;Especially fast for Scala builds, compared to alternatives.;Builds standalone python executables (PEX files);Has a plugin system to add custom features and override stock behavior.;Runs on Linux and Mac OS X.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Forks
2.8K
GitHub Forks
674
Stacks
3.4K
Stacks
23
Followers
1.7K
Followers
86
Votes
414
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
Cons
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives
Pros
  • 6
    Creates deployable packages
  • 4
    Scales
  • 4
    Runs on Linux
  • 4
    Runs on OS X
  • 4
    BUILD files

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, Pants?

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

Sonatype Nexus

Sonatype Nexus

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

JFrog Artifactory

JFrog Artifactory

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana