StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Mobile Connect vs oso

Mobile Connect vs oso

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mobile Connect
Mobile Connect
Stacks0
Followers2
Votes0
oso
oso
Stacks39
Followers14
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.5K
Forks187

Mobile Connect vs oso: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Device Compatibility**: Mobile Connect is widely supported by a variety of devices and platforms including iOS and Android, whereas oso is specifically designed for a particular operating system or device.
2. **Authentication Method**: Mobile Connect utilizes a standardized authentication method leveraging a user's mobile phone number, while oso may incorporate different authentication mechanisms based on the specific requirements of the device.
3. **Industry Adoption**: Mobile Connect is more commonly used for authentication and authorization in the telecom industry, while oso may be utilized in other sectors such as healthcare or finance.
4. **Integration Flexibility**: Mobile Connect offers a seamless integration process with existing systems and services, while oso may require additional configurations or modifications for integration.
5. **Data Privacy Compliance**: Mobile Connect adheres to specific data privacy regulations and guidelines, ensuring user data protection, while oso may have varying levels of compliance based on the implementation.
6. **Scalability and Performance**: Mobile Connect is designed to handle high volumes of authentication requests with minimal latency, while oso's scalability and performance may vary based on the underlying technology stack and infrastructure.

In Summary, Mobile Connect and oso differ in device compatibility, authentication method, industry adoption, integration flexibility, data privacy compliance, and scalability/performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mobile Connect
Mobile Connect
oso
oso

It is a new authentication service based on the Open ID Connect Standard and SIM cards. Its API offers a secure and convenient method to login to your service.

Oso Cloud is authorization-as-a-service. It provides abstractions for building and iterating on authorization in your application – based on years of work with hundreds of engineering teams.

Simple, secure authentication; Free to try, easy to use; Access a growing user base
authorization; access control; permissions; roles; role-based access control; RBAC; application authorization; authorization service
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
187
Stacks
0
Stacks
39
Followers
2
Followers
14
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Rust
Rust
Django
Django
Java
Java
Node.js
Node.js
Flask
Flask

What are some alternatives to Mobile Connect, oso?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope