StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Mock/it vs Newman

Mock/it vs Newman

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Newman
Newman
Stacks123
Followers93
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.1K
Forks1.2K
Mock/it
Mock/it
Stacks1
Followers20
Votes0

Mock/it vs Newman: What are the differences?

  1. Integration Testing Tool: Mock/it is primarily an integration testing tool that focuses on simulating external dependencies like APIs, databases, or services to create controlled environments for testing, whereas Newman is a command-line collection runner for Postman, mainly used for running and testing APIs.
  2. Dependency Simulation: Mock/it allows users to easily mock responses from external systems, aiding in the verification of system interactions without relying on actual external services, while Newman does not have this mocking capability and is more focused on running and monitoring API requests in a collection.
  3. Scripting Language: Mock/it provides a scripting language for defining complex behavior of mocked services, giving users more control over the responses generated, whereas Newman primarily relies on the Postman collection format and does not offer a scripting language for custom behavior.
  4. Stand-alone Tool vs. Part of a Suite: Mock/it is a stand-alone tool designed for mocking and testing external dependencies, offering flexibility in setting up simulated environments, while Newman is part of the Postman suite and is tailored for executing API requests within collections created in Postman.
  5. Real-time Monitoring: Mock/it enables real-time monitoring and control over the behavior of simulated external services, providing instant feedback during testing, whereas Newman focuses more on running predefined API requests without the ability to dynamically alter the behavior of services during testing.

In Summary, the key differences between Mock/it and Newman lie in their focus on integration testing, dependency simulation capabilities, scripting language support, standalone versus suite integration, and real-time monitoring features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Newman
Newman
Mock/it
Mock/it

Newman is a command-line collection runner for Postman. It allows you to effortlessly run and test a Postman collection directly from the command-line. It is built with extensibility in mind so that you can easily integrate it with your continuous integration servers and build systems.

Mocking accelerates your development by building against a stand-in API. Ideal for mocking RESTful services or decoupling your client from an external API dependency. Setup a mock endpoint in seconds by claiming a custom sub-domain and inviting teammates to collaborate.

-
Dedicated subdomains; Unlimited teammates; No coding required; SSL on every request; Request logging; No usage limits
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
123
Stacks
1
Followers
93
Followers
20
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Postman
Postman
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Newman, Mock/it?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope