Mock/it vs Paw

Overview

Paw

Stacks233

Followers277

Votes164

Mock/it

Stacks1

Followers20

Votes0

Mock/it vs Paw: What are the differences?

Integration with API testing tools: Mock/it integrates seamlessly with popular API testing tools such as Postman and Swagger, streamlining the process of utilizing mock servers with existing API testing workflows.
Visual API Designer: Paw offers a comprehensive visual API designer feature, allowing users to easily create and customize API requests with parameters, headers, and body content, providing a more user-friendly interface compared to Mock/it.
Mock Server Hosting: Mock/it provides a dedicated mock server hosting service, eliminating the need for users to set up and maintain their own servers, while Paw lacks this specific feature, requiring users to handle server hosting independently.
Advanced Scripting Capabilities: Paw allows users to write custom scripts using JavaScript directly within the application, enabling complex logic and dynamic responses, whereas Mock/it does not offer this level of advanced scripting functionalities.
Pricing Model: While Mock/it offers a free tier with certain limitations, Paw operates on a paid subscription model with various pricing plans, catering to users with different needs and budget constraints.
Collaboration Tools: Paw provides built-in collaboration and sharing features, allowing team members to work together on API requests and projects, fostering better teamwork and productivity compared to Mock/it which lacks robust collaboration tools.

In Summary, when comparing Mock/it and Paw, key differences include integration with API testing tools, visual API designer, mock server hosting, advanced scripting capabilities, pricing model, and collaboration tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Paw	Mock/it
Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.	Mocking accelerates your development by building against a stand-in API. Ideal for mocking RESTful services or decoupling your client from an external API dependency. Setup a mock endpoint in seconds by claiming a custom sub-domain and inviting teammates to collaborate.
Organize your Requests, make Groups or sort by Host, Name, etc.;Easily build your requests, enjoy Formatters and Dynamic Values.;See Request and Response infos, headers, and body.;View formatted or raw HTTP Requests and Responses.;JSON Outline Viewer and Editor.;Paw supports OAuth 1 & 2, HTTP Basic Auth and Amazon S3;Paw generates ready-to-use client code	Dedicated subdomains; Unlimited teammates; No coding required; SSL on every request; Request logging; No usage limits
Statistics
Stacks 233	Stacks 1
Followers 277	Followers 20
Votes 164	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 46 Great interface 37 Easy to use 25 More stable and performant than the others 16 Saves endpoints list for testing 13 Supports environment variables Cons 3 It's not free 2 MacOS Only	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Paw, Mock/it?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

DuckRails

DuckRails is an open source development tool that helps developer mock API endpoints quickly & dynamically outside the application code.

Related Comparisons

Mock/it vs Paw: What are the differences?

Integration with API testing tools: Mock/it integrates seamlessly with popular API testing tools such as Postman and Swagger, streamlining the process of utilizing mock servers with existing API testing workflows.
Visual API Designer: Paw offers a comprehensive visual API designer feature, allowing users to easily create and customize API requests with parameters, headers, and body content, providing a more user-friendly interface compared to Mock/it.
Mock Server Hosting: Mock/it provides a dedicated mock server hosting service, eliminating the need for users to set up and maintain their own servers, while Paw lacks this specific feature, requiring users to handle server hosting independently.
Advanced Scripting Capabilities: Paw allows users to write custom scripts using JavaScript directly within the application, enabling complex logic and dynamic responses, whereas Mock/it does not offer this level of advanced scripting functionalities.
Pricing Model: While Mock/it offers a free tier with certain limitations, Paw operates on a paid subscription model with various pricing plans, catering to users with different needs and budget constraints.
Collaboration Tools: Paw provides built-in collaboration and sharing features, allowing team members to work together on API requests and projects, fostering better teamwork and productivity compared to Mock/it which lacks robust collaboration tools.

Mock/it vs Paw

Overview