StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Monkberry vs OpenUI5

Monkberry vs OpenUI5

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenUI5
OpenUI5
Stacks37
Followers51
Votes5
Monkberry
Monkberry
Stacks2
Followers21
Votes3

Monkberry vs OpenUI5: What are the differences?

Introduction: Monkberry and OpenUI5 are two popular web development frameworks that offer different features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between the two can help developers choose the right framework for their projects.

1. Data Binding: Monkberry uses a reactive approach to data binding, while OpenUI5 adheres to a One-Way data binding strategy. This means that changes in data will automatically reflect in the Monkberry template, but in OpenUI5, changes need to be propagated manually.

2. Templating Engine: Monkberry utilizes a virtual DOM and features a simple syntax for defining templates, making it lightweight and efficient for rendering complex UI elements. On the other hand, OpenUI5 uses XML views for defining UI elements, providing a more structured approach but potentially increasing the complexity of the code base.

3. Component Architecture: Monkberry follows a component-based architecture, allowing developers to create reusable and encapsulated components that can be easily integrated into different parts of the application. In contrast, OpenUI5 provides a more monolithic structure with predefined UI controls and components that may limit flexibility.

4. Package Size: Monkberry has a smaller package size compared to OpenUI5, making it a suitable choice for projects where file size optimization is a priority. This can result in faster loading times and improved performance, especially on devices with slower internet connections.

5. Community Support: OpenUI5 benefits from strong community support and a wide range of plugins and extensions, making it easier for developers to find solutions to common problems and streamline development processes. Monkberry, while growing in popularity, may have a more limited ecosystem of resources and community-driven contributions.

6. Learning Curve: Monkberry offers a more streamlined and intuitive API, making it easier for developers to get started with building web applications. In contrast, OpenUI5 may have a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive feature set and complex architecture, requiring more time and effort to master.

Summary: In summary, Monkberry and OpenUI5 differ in their approaches to data binding, templating engine, component architecture, package size, community support, and learning curve, making them suitable for different types of web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenUI5
OpenUI5
Monkberry
Monkberry

It is an Open Source JavaScript UI library, maintained by SAP. It lets you build enterprise-ready web applications, responsive to all devices, running on almost any browser of your choice. It’s based on JavaScript, using JQuery as its foundation and follows web standards. It eases your development with a client-side HTML5 rendering library including a rich set of controls and supports data binding to different models (JSON, XML and OData).

Why is Monkberry so fast? Even in comparison with React, Monkberry is 10 times faster, sometimes 100 times faster. It's because Monkberry will do only necessary dom updates, and does it in a completely different way than React does. Monkberry compiles template to plain JavaScript to gain an advantage by using v8 hidden classes and reduce call stack.

Mvc; Ui; Responsive; Html5; Data-binding; Internationalization; Routing
Small 1kb minified & gzipped;Simple, small learning curve;Fully tested;Precompiled templates;Source maps;Custom tags;Blazingly fast (only necessary dom updates)
Statistics
Stacks
37
Stacks
2
Followers
51
Followers
21
Votes
5
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Enterprise Ready
  • 2
    Controls
  • 1
    Easy to Use
Pros
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Simple
  • 1
    Awesome
Integrations
Font Awesome
Font Awesome
Firebase
Firebase
Redux
Redux
Algolia
Algolia
Sentry
Sentry
Meteor
Meteor
React Router
React Router
HTML5
HTML5
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to OpenUI5, Monkberry?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase