Alternatives to Moqups logo

Alternatives to Moqups

UXPin, Sketch, Adobe XD, InVision, and Balsamiq are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Moqups.
22
31
+ 1
0

What is Moqups and what are its top alternatives?

Achieve flow with our web app for creating mockups, wireframes and interactive prototypes that look great onscreen and on paper thanks to the Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) technology.
Moqups is a tool in the Interactive Mockups category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Moqups

  • UXPin

    UXPin

    It is a code-based design tool that merges design and engineering into one unified process. Thanks to conditional interactions, variables, state-based animations, and powerful expressions, you can build prototypes that feel like the real thing. In other words, anything that's on the web can be accurately prototyped in UXPin. ...

  • Sketch

    Sketch

    Easily create complex shapes with our state-of-the-art vector boolean operations and take advantage of our extensive layer styles. ...

  • Adobe XD

    Adobe XD

    A vector-based tool developed and published by Adobe Inc for designing and prototyping user experience for web and mobile apps. ...

  • InVision

    InVision

    InVision lets you create stunningly realistic interactive wireframes and prototypes without compromising your creative vision. ...

  • Balsamiq

    Balsamiq

    Balsamiq Mockups is a web tool that allows users to mock up different designs and ideas quickly and easily. Balsamic Mockups is similar to drawing mockups, but it is digital ...

  • MockFlow

    MockFlow

    MockFlow is an online wireframe software that helps to design, collaborate (in real-time) user interface mockups for software and websites. ...

  • Figma

    Figma

    Figma is the first interface design tool with real-time collaboration. It keeps everyone on the same page. Focus on the work instead of fighting your tools. ...

  • Lucidchart

    Lucidchart

    Solution for visual communication. Create online flowcharts, diagrams, UML sketches, and ER models. ...

Moqups alternatives & related posts

UXPin logo

UXPin

86
115
25
The Full-Stack UX Design Platform
86
115
+ 1
25
PROS OF UXPIN
  • 5
    Semantic UI support
  • 4
    Can make unique interactions
  • 2
    Design Systems
  • 2
    Jira Integration
  • 2
    Prototyping
  • 1
    Co-Design together real-time with designers on my team
  • 1
    Design Libraries Auto-Generated
  • 1
    Animated Gif Support
  • 1
    Unlimited Previews (no charge for reviewers)
  • 1
    Document and Annotate Designs
  • 1
    Unlimited Storage for all file types
  • 1
    Sketch Integration
  • 1
    Photoshop Integration
  • 1
    Sharing prototypes on mobile device
  • 1
    Prebuilt & Customizable UI Patterns
CONS OF UXPIN
  • 1
    No free tier

related UXPin posts

Sketch logo

Sketch

1.7K
947
59
Professional Digital Design for Mac
1.7K
947
+ 1
59
PROS OF SKETCH
  • 23
    Lightweight alternative to Photoshop
  • 11
    Mirror designs on mobile devices
  • 9
    Reusable elements/components
  • 7
    Vector
  • 5
    Plugins for everything
  • 2
    Real-time design preview on iOS devices
  • 1
    Constant updates
  • 1
    Thought for UI design
CONS OF SKETCH
  • 4
    Not for Windows
  • 3
    Horrible for slide presentations

related Sketch posts

Priit Kaasik
Engineering Lead at Katana MRP · | 8 upvotes · 437.8K views

How we ended up choosing Confluence as our internal web / wiki / documentation platform at Katana.

It happened because we chose Bitbucket over GitHub . We had Katana's first hackaton to assemble and test product engineering platform. It turned out that at that time you could have Bitbucket's private repositories and a team of five people for free - Done!

This decision led us to using Bitbucket pipelines for CI, Jira for Kanban, and finally, Confluence. We also use Microsoft Office 365 and started with using OneNote, but SharePoint is still a nightmare product to use to collaborate, so OneNote had to go.

Now, when thinking of the key value of Confluence to Katana then it is Product Requirements Management. We use Page Properties macros, integrations (with Slack , InVision, Sketch etc.) to manage Product Roadmap, flash out Epic and User Stories.

We ended up with using Confluence because it is the best fit for our current engineering ecosystem.

See more
Adobe XD logo

Adobe XD

1.1K
769
46
UX/UI design and collaboration tool
1.1K
769
+ 1
46
PROS OF ADOBE XD
  • 14
    Free
  • 8
    Interactive Prototypes
  • 7
    Vector
  • 7
    Reusable elements/components
  • 6
    Clean Design
  • 4
    Imports Sketch files
CONS OF ADOBE XD
  • 5
    No dark theme

related Adobe XD posts

Nadia Matveyeva
UI Designer at freelancer · | 5 upvotes · 8.5K views
Shared insights
on
InVisionInVisionAdobe XDAdobe XD

I am working on a project for a client, I need to provide them with ideas and prototypes. They all have Adobe XD, but not InVision - I am the only one who will have that if purchased. I am trying to decide what would be the best tool to hand off the work to a developer who in terms will be working in PySide (Qt related) or Tkinter. Is there any benefits to me or the developer to work in Adobe XD or InVision. I am just trying to use the best tool to get the job done between the two.

Thank you in advance! Nadia

See more
אלישבע מזרחי
Shared insights
on
ZeplinZeplinAdobe XDAdobe XDHTML5HTML5

Hi, I'm a web designer. I need to convert files to HTML5 to transfer them to a developer. I know the Adobe XD software really well, I also heard about Zeplin. What software do you recommend working with? Is Zeplin better than XD?

See more
InVision logo

InVision

6.9K
4.6K
617
Prototyping & Collaboration For Design Teams
6.9K
4.6K
+ 1
617
PROS OF INVISION
  • 158
    Collaborative
  • 128
    Simple
  • 95
    Pretty
  • 79
    Quick
  • 45
    Works with lots of devices
  • 33
    Free
  • 29
    Cool for remote team prototyping
  • 17
    It revolutionized the way I share work with clients
  • 10
    Legendary customer support
  • 8
    Dropbox Integration
  • 3
    Collaboration
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Rapid Prototyping
  • 2
    LiveShare
  • 1
    They are always improving the product suite
  • 1
    Allows for a comprehensive workflow
  • 1
    Annotation
  • 1
    Beautiful UI
  • 1
    Brings mockups to life
CONS OF INVISION
    Be the first to leave a con

    related InVision posts

    Priit Kaasik
    Engineering Lead at Katana MRP · | 8 upvotes · 437.8K views

    How we ended up choosing Confluence as our internal web / wiki / documentation platform at Katana.

    It happened because we chose Bitbucket over GitHub . We had Katana's first hackaton to assemble and test product engineering platform. It turned out that at that time you could have Bitbucket's private repositories and a team of five people for free - Done!

    This decision led us to using Bitbucket pipelines for CI, Jira for Kanban, and finally, Confluence. We also use Microsoft Office 365 and started with using OneNote, but SharePoint is still a nightmare product to use to collaborate, so OneNote had to go.

    Now, when thinking of the key value of Confluence to Katana then it is Product Requirements Management. We use Page Properties macros, integrations (with Slack , InVision, Sketch etc.) to manage Product Roadmap, flash out Epic and User Stories.

    We ended up with using Confluence because it is the best fit for our current engineering ecosystem.

    See more
    Nadia Matveyeva
    UI Designer at freelancer · | 5 upvotes · 8.5K views
    Shared insights
    on
    InVisionInVisionAdobe XDAdobe XD

    I am working on a project for a client, I need to provide them with ideas and prototypes. They all have Adobe XD, but not InVision - I am the only one who will have that if purchased. I am trying to decide what would be the best tool to hand off the work to a developer who in terms will be working in PySide (Qt related) or Tkinter. Is there any benefits to me or the developer to work in Adobe XD or InVision. I am just trying to use the best tool to get the job done between the two.

    Thank you in advance! Nadia

    See more
    Balsamiq logo

    Balsamiq

    824
    566
    222
    Rapid wireframing tool that helps you work faster & smarter
    824
    566
    + 1
    222
    PROS OF BALSAMIQ
    • 71
      Useful mockups
    • 60
      Easy to use
    • 51
      Very useful & simple
    • 19
      Good looking
    • 15
      It helps my creative work
    • 4
      Integrate with Confluence and JIRA
    • 2
      For layouts with deadlines
    CONS OF BALSAMIQ
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Balsamiq posts

      MockFlow logo

      MockFlow

      21
      32
      0
      Super-easy Wireframing
      21
      32
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF MOCKFLOW
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF MOCKFLOW
          Be the first to leave a con

          related MockFlow posts

          Figma logo

          Figma

          2.4K
          1.5K
          66
          The collaborative interface design tool.
          2.4K
          1.5K
          + 1
          66
          PROS OF FIGMA
          • 12
            Web-based application
          • 8
            Intuitive interface and perfect collaboration
          • 7
            Works on both Mac and Windows
          • 6
            Free software
          • 5
            Works on multiple OS's
          • 4
            Great plugins, easy to extend
          • 4
            Highly Collaborative
          • 4
            Large community, tutorials, documentation
          • 4
            Imports Sketch files
          • 4
            Hands done the best design tool for collaboration!
          • 4
            Interactive, event-based prototypes
          • 2
            No more syncing between Sketch and InVision
          • 2
            Prototyping, design files and comments all in one place
          CONS OF FIGMA
          • 5
            Limited Export options

          related Figma posts

          Adam Neary

          The tool we use for editing UI is React Storybook. It is the perfect place to make sure your work aligns with designs to the pixel across breakpoints. You get fast hot module reloading and a couple checkboxes to enable/disable browser features like Flexbox.

          The only tricks I apply to Storybook are loading the stories with the mock data we’ve extracted from the API. If your mock data really covers all the various various possible states for your UI, you are good to go. Beyond that, if you have alternative states you want to account for, perhaps loading or error states, you can add them in manually.

          This is the crux of the matter for Storybook. This file is entirely generated from Yeoman (discussed below), and it delivers the examples from the Alps Journey by default. getSectionsFromJourney() just filters the sections.

          One other hack you’ll notice is that I added a pair of divs to bookend my component vertically, since Storybook renders with whitespace around the component. That is fine for buttons or UI with borders, but it’s hard to tell precisely where your component starts and ends, so I hacked them in there.

          Since we are talking about how all these fabulous tools work so well together to help you be productive, can I just say what a delight it is to work on UI with Zeplin or Figma side by side with Storybook. Digging into UI in this abstract way takes all the chaos of this madcap world away one breakpoint at a time, and in that quiet realm, you are good down to the pixel every time.

          To supply Storybook and our unit tests with realistic mock data, we want to extract the mock data directly from our Shared Development Environment. As with codegen, even a small change in a query fragment should also trigger many small changes in mock data. And here, similarly, the hard part is tackled entirely by Apollo CLI, and you can stitch it together with your own code in no time.

          Coming back to Zeplin and Figma briefly, they're both built to allow engineers to extract content directly to facilitate product development.

          Extracting the copy for an entire paragraph is as simple as selecting the content in Zeplin and clicking the “copy” icon in the Content section of the sidebar. In the case of Zeplin, images can be extracted by selecting and clicking the “download” icon in the Assets section of the sidebar.

          ReactDesignStack #StorybookStack #StorybookDesignStack
          See more
          Lucas Litton
          Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 1 upvote · 114.8K views

          We chose Figma because of the collaboration aspect of it. We are able to work as a team to create designs for web apps, mobile apps, and alike. After creating our designs in Figma we start exporting the assets and designs over to Webflow and Supernova.

          See more
          Lucidchart logo

          Lucidchart

          185
          154
          0
          Collaborative diagramming solution for your entire organization
          185
          154
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF LUCIDCHART
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF LUCIDCHART
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Lucidchart posts

              Julien DeFrance
              Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 1 upvote · 198.5K views

              When starting my new role at #Stessa, I needed a solution to start diagramming some of my #Architecture so I'd be able to share my views on #SystemArchitecture with the rest of the team.

              Visualization is key. Especially when working with complex/distributed systems. You want to make sure everybody's got the same understanding of your approach, so you can better communicate, and start delegating more.

              In the past, I had worked with #VisualParadigm for #UML, in both desktop and #SaaS version of the product. Also worked with #LucidChart We also looked at potential alternatives such as Microsoft Visio for instance.

              Ultimately, my recommendation was & we closed on Lucidchart, as it won on couple of key aspects : #Team #Collaboration, #Integrations with #AWS for instance, and certain specific visualizations we were looking for / others didn't have.

              This isn't just for #Engineering. I've seen Lucidchart being used by #Product Teams, #Network #Engineers, #IT Departments, #DevOps, or non-Engineering related teams.

              See more