StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. MSSQL vs TimescaleDB

MSSQL vs TimescaleDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MSSQL
MSSQL
Stacks1.0K
Followers417
Votes3
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Stacks226
Followers374
Votes44
GitHub Stars20.6K
Forks988

MSSQL vs TimescaleDB: What are the differences?

Introduction: In comparing MSSQL to TimescaleDB, it is important to recognize the key differences between the two databases to make an informed decision for specific use cases.

1. SQL vs Time-Series Data: MSSQL is a traditional relational database management system that excels in handling structured data using SQL queries. In contrast, TimescaleDB is specifically designed for time-series data, optimizing data storage and retrieval for time-based sequences.

2. Scalability: MSSQL is known for its vertical scalability, allowing for increased performance by adding more powerful hardware. On the other hand, TimescaleDB is built for horizontal scalability, enabling the distributed processing of time-series data across multiple nodes to handle increasing data volumes efficiently.

3. Time-Series Data Compression: TimescaleDB utilizes hypertables and data compression techniques to efficiently store time-series data, reducing storage requirements without sacrificing query performance. In MSSQL, data compression options are available but may not be as specialized for time-series data storage.

4. Native Time-Series Functions: TimescaleDB offers a wide range of native time-series functions and extensions that simplify complex time-based queries and analysis. While MSSQL can handle time-based operations, it may require additional SQL scripts or programming logic to achieve similar functionalities.

5. Performance: TimescaleDB's architecture is optimized for fast reads and writes of time-series data, making it well-suited for applications that require real-time data processing. While MSSQL can deliver high performance, especially with proper indexing and tuning, TimescaleDB may outperform it in scenarios with intensive time-series data workloads.

6. Community Support: TimescaleDB has a growing community that focuses on time-series data use cases and provides active support and contributions to the database's development. In comparison, MSSQL has a well-established community but may not have the same specialization and focus on time-series data management.

In Summary, the key differences between MSSQL and TimescaleDB lie in their specialization for time-series data, scalability approaches, data compression techniques, native functions, performance optimizations, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MSSQL, TimescaleDB

Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Redacted DevWorks

Dec 3, 2019

DecidedonPostGISPostGIS

While there's been some very clever techniques that has allowed non-natively supported geo querying to be performed, it is incredibly slow in the long game and error prone at best.

MySQL finally introduced it's own GEO functions and special indexing operations for GIS type data. I prototyped with this, as MySQL is the most familiar database to me. But no matter what I did with it, how much tuning i'd give it, how much I played with it, the results would come back inconsistent.

It was very disappointing.

I figured, at this point, that SQL Server, being an enterprise solution authored by one of the biggest worldwide software developers in the world, Microsoft, might contain some decent GIS in it.

I was very disappointed.

Postgres is a Database solution i'm still getting familiar with, but I noticed it had no built in support for GIS. So I hilariously didn't pay it too much attention. That was until I stumbled upon PostGIS and my world changed forever.

449k views449k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Sdev
Sdev

Jun 12, 2020

Needs adviceonMSSQLMSSQLMySQLMySQL

We are planning to migrate one of my applications from MSSQL to MySQL. Can someone help me with the version to select?. I have a strong inclination towards MySql 5.7. But, I see there are some standout features added in Mysql 8.0 like JSON_TABLE. Just wanted to know if the newer version has not compromised on its speed while giving out some add on features.

424k views424k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MSSQL
MSSQL
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB

It is capable of storing any type of data that you want. It will let you quickly store and retrieve information and multiple web site visitors can use it at one time.

TimescaleDB: An open-source database built for analyzing time-series data with the power and convenience of SQL — on premise, at the edge, or in the cloud.

Resumable online index rebuild; SQL Server machine learning services; Query processing improvements; Automatic database tuning; TempDB file size improvements; Smart differential backup; Smart transaction log backup.
Packaged as a PostgreSQL extension;Full ANSI SQL;JOINs (e.g., across PostgreSQL tables);Complex queries;Secondary indexes;Composite indexes;Support for very high cardinality data;Triggers;Constraints;UPSERTS;JSON/JSONB;Ability to ingest out of order data;Ability to perform accurate rollups;Data retention policies;Fast deletes;Integration with PostGIS and the rest of the PostgreSQL ecosystem;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
20.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
988
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
226
Followers
417
Followers
374
Votes
3
Votes
44
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy of use
Cons
  • 1
    License Cost
  • 1
    Vendor lock-in
Pros
  • 9
    Open source
  • 8
    Easy Query Language
  • 7
    Time-series data analysis
  • 5
    Established postgresql API and support
  • 4
    Reliable
Cons
  • 5
    Licensing issues when running on managed databases
Integrations
MySQL
MySQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Oracle
Oracle
SQLite
SQLite
Prometheus
Prometheus
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
Ruby
Ruby
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Django
Django
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
pgAdmin
pgAdmin
Python
Python
Kafka
Kafka
Datadog
Datadog

What are some alternatives to MSSQL, TimescaleDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase