StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Newman vs Soap UI

Newman vs Soap UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Newman
Newman
Stacks123
Followers93
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.1K
Forks1.2K
Soap UI
Soap UI
Stacks241
Followers157
Votes3

Newman vs Soap UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown code formatting has been applied to the following information regarding the key differences between Newman and SoapUI. Newman and SoapUI are both popular tools used in the field of software testing, however, they differ in several important ways.

  1. Installation: Newman is a command-line tool that is part of the Postman ecosystem. It is installed globally using npm, making it easily accessible from any command prompt. On the other hand, SoapUI is a standalone application that needs to be downloaded and installed on a computer before it can be used.

  2. Functional Testing: Newman is primarily designed for functional API testing and integration testing. It allows users to run Postman collections from the command line interface, making it useful for automation purposes. SoapUI, on the other hand, is a comprehensive testing tool that supports functional testing, load testing, security testing, and more. It is specifically designed for testing SOAP and REST APIs.

  3. Interface: Newman does not have a graphical user interface (GUI) and is entirely command-line based. Users interact with Newman by executing commands and providing necessary parameters. In contrast, SoapUI provides a user-friendly GUI that allows users to create, edit, and execute test cases in a visual manner. This makes it more suitable for testers who prefer working with a visual interface.

  4. Scripting Capabilities: Newman allows users to write JavaScript code to enhance the testing capabilities and flexibility. It provides a scripting sandbox environment where users can customize their tests by accessing and manipulating test data, environment variables, and response data. SoapUI, on the other hand, provides support for scripting using various languages such as Groovy, JavaScript, and others. This allows for advanced scripting scenarios and integration with external systems.

  5. Request Generation: Newman relies on predefined Postman collections to generate API requests. These collections contain information about request URLs, headers, body, parameters, and pre/post request scripts. It allows users to easily configure and manage different API requests within these collections. In contrast, SoapUI allows users to create API requests from scratch using a user-friendly interface. Users can specify all the necessary details for the request, such as endpoint, method, headers, parameters, and authentication, using intuitive form-based editors.

  6. Reporting and Documentation: Newman provides basic HTML and JSON reports that can be generated during test execution. These reports show detailed information about request/response, test outcomes, and execution statistics. It also allows users to export collections as documentation in different formats like Postman Collection, Swagger, etc. On the other hand, SoapUI generates comprehensive test reports that include detailed test results, logs, error details, and more. It also allows users to generate test documentation in various formats, such as HTML, PDF, and Word.

In summary, Newman and SoapUI differ in terms of installation, functional testing capabilities, interface, scripting capabilities, request generation, and reporting/documentation. Newman is a command-line tool focused on API testing, while SoapUI is a feature-rich testing tool designed for testing SOAP and REST APIs with a graphical user interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Newman
Newman
Soap UI
Soap UI

Newman is a command-line collection runner for Postman. It allows you to effortlessly run and test a Postman collection directly from the command-line. It is built with extensibility in mind so that you can easily integrate it with your continuous integration servers and build systems.

It is an open source functional Testing tool for API Testing. It supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS, AMF and JDBC. It supports functional tests, security tests, and virtualization.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
123
Stacks
241
Followers
93
Followers
157
Votes
0
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Open source
Integrations
Postman
Postman
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Newman, Soap UI?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope