StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. OAuth2 vs OmniAuth

OAuth2 vs OmniAuth

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OmniAuth
OmniAuth
Stacks312
Followers150
Votes9
OAuth2
OAuth2
Stacks683
Followers650
Votes0

OAuth2 vs OmniAuth: What are the differences?

Key Differences between OAuth2 and OmniAuth

OAuth2 is an authentication protocol that allows users to authorize third-party applications to access their protected resources without sharing their credentials. On the other hand, OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework that provides a standardized way to authenticate users across multiple providers.

  1. Integration Approach: OAuth2 is a protocol that defines the process flow and communication between the client application, authorization server, and resource server. It sets the rules for authentication and authorization. On the other hand, OmniAuth is a library that integrates with OAuth2 and other authentication strategies, providing a unified interface to authenticate users from different providers.

  2. Supported Providers: OAuth2 is a widely adopted standard and supports a large number of providers such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and GitHub. OmniAuth, being an authentication framework, supports a variety of providers beyond OAuth2, including OpenID, LDAP, and more. It provides a unified API to authenticate users from different providers.

  3. Configuration Flexibility: OAuth2 is a protocol with defined specifications. The configuration options are limited to the parameters defined by the protocol. OmniAuth, being a framework, allows more flexibility in configuring and customizing authentication strategies. It provides options to configure different providers with specific settings and handle additional user data.

  4. Integration Complexity: OAuth2 integration can be more complex, as it involves understanding and implementing the protocol specifications. Developers need to handle token management, token refresh, and error handling. On the other hand, OmniAuth simplifies the integration process by providing a unified interface and handling the complexities of different authentication strategies. It abstracts the underlying details of the OAuth2 protocol, making it easier to integrate with multiple providers.

  5. Community and Documentation: OAuth2 has a larger community and extensive documentation due to its wide adoption and standardized approach. It is easier to find resources, tutorials, and examples related to OAuth2 implementation. OmniAuth, although widely used, has a relatively smaller community and documentation compared to OAuth2. However, it has an active community that provides support and updates the library.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: OAuth2 provides a standardized way for authentication and authorization, limiting customization and extensibility options. OmniAuth, being a framework, allows more customization by providing hooks and callbacks to modify the authentication flow, handle additional user data, and integrate with custom authentication strategies. It offers the flexibility to extend and modify the authentication process as per the application's requirements.

In Summary, OAuth2 is an authentication protocol, while OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework that integrates with OAuth2 and other authentication strategies, providing a unified interface to authenticate users from different providers. The key differences include the integration approach, the range of supported providers, configuration flexibility, integration complexity, community and documentation, and customization and extensibility options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OmniAuth
OmniAuth
OAuth2
OAuth2

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf.

Multi-provider authentication;Over 200 supported authentication providers (see list at https://github.com/intridea/omniauth/wiki/List-of-Strategies);Open source
-
Statistics
Stacks
312
Stacks
683
Followers
150
Followers
650
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Easy Social Login
  • 3
    Free
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to OmniAuth, OAuth2?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope