OkHttp vs RestSharp

Overview

OkHttp

Stacks74

Followers92

Votes0

RestSharp

Stacks743

Followers37

Votes0

GitHub Stars9.8K

Forks2.3K

OkHttp vs RestSharp: What are the differences?

Introduction: When working on web development projects, developers often need to interact with APIs to send and receive data. OkHttp and RestSharp are two popular libraries that facilitate this communication. Understanding the key differences between OkHttp and RestSharp can help developers make informed decisions when selecting the appropriate library for their projects.

Language and Platform Compatibility: OkHttp is a Java-based HTTP client for Android and Java applications, while RestSharp is a .NET-based library primarily used with C#. Developers working within the Java ecosystem might find OkHttp more familiar and easier to integrate, whereas those in the .NET environment would naturally lean towards using RestSharp.
Community Support and Documentation: OkHttp benefits from being a part of the larger Square ecosystem, which provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support. RestSharp, on the other hand, has its own community and resources, albeit smaller in size compared to OkHttp. Depending on the developer's preference for community interaction and available resources, this difference can influence library selection.
Asynchronous Requests Handling: OkHttp provides efficient support for handling asynchronous HTTP requests out-of-the-box, making it an optimal choice for applications that require non-blocking I/O operations. RestSharp, although capable of asynchronous programming, may require additional configuration and setup, making it slightly more complex for asynchronous request handling compared to OkHttp.
Serialization and Deserialization: RestSharp includes built-in support for serialization and deserialization of JSON, XML, and other data formats, simplifying data exchange with APIs. While OkHttp focuses on network operations, developers working with RestSharp can benefit from its comprehensive serialization capabilities, reducing the need for additional third-party libraries.
Performance and Speed: OkHttp is known for its lightweight design and high-performance characteristics, making it a preferred choice for applications where speed is crucial. RestSharp, while efficient in handling API requests, might introduce slightly more overhead due to its feature-rich design and extensive functionalities. Developers prioritizing performance might lean towards OkHttp for its optimized speed.
Flexibility and Customization: RestSharp offers a more customizable approach to build and configure HTTP requests, allowing developers to tailor their requests with various parameters, headers, and authentication methods. On the other hand, OkHttp simplifies request configuration with a fluent API but may lack the level of customization that RestSharp provides. Depending on the project requirements, developers can choose between flexibility and simplicity when deciding between the two libraries.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between OkHttp and RestSharp enables developers to make informed decisions based on factors such as language compatibility, community support, performance, and customization needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OkHttp	RestSharp
HTTP is the way modern applications network. It’s how we exchange data & media. Doing HTTP efficiently makes your stuff load faster and saves bandwidth.	It is probably the most popular HTTP client library for .NET. Featuring automatic serialization and deserialization, request and response type detection, variety of authentications and other useful features
HTTP/2 support allows all requests to the same host to share a socket.;Connection pooling reduces request latency (if HTTP/2 isn’t available).;Transparent GZIP shrinks download sizes.;Response caching avoids the network completely for repeat requests	Serialization; Sync and Async; Extensive configuration; Authentication; Forms, request body, and files
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 9.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 74	Stacks 743
Followers 92	Followers 37
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	.NET

What are some alternatives to OkHttp, RestSharp?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

OkHttp vs RestSharp: What are the differences?

Language and Platform Compatibility: OkHttp is a Java-based HTTP client for Android and Java applications, while RestSharp is a .NET-based library primarily used with C#. Developers working within the Java ecosystem might find OkHttp more familiar and easier to integrate, whereas those in the .NET environment would naturally lean towards using RestSharp.
Community Support and Documentation: OkHttp benefits from being a part of the larger Square ecosystem, which provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support. RestSharp, on the other hand, has its own community and resources, albeit smaller in size compared to OkHttp. Depending on the developer's preference for community interaction and available resources, this difference can influence library selection.
Asynchronous Requests Handling: OkHttp provides efficient support for handling asynchronous HTTP requests out-of-the-box, making it an optimal choice for applications that require non-blocking I/O operations. RestSharp, although capable of asynchronous programming, may require additional configuration and setup, making it slightly more complex for asynchronous request handling compared to OkHttp.
Serialization and Deserialization: RestSharp includes built-in support for serialization and deserialization of JSON, XML, and other data formats, simplifying data exchange with APIs. While OkHttp focuses on network operations, developers working with RestSharp can benefit from its comprehensive serialization capabilities, reducing the need for additional third-party libraries.
Performance and Speed: OkHttp is known for its lightweight design and high-performance characteristics, making it a preferred choice for applications where speed is crucial. RestSharp, while efficient in handling API requests, might introduce slightly more overhead due to its feature-rich design and extensive functionalities. Developers prioritizing performance might lean towards OkHttp for its optimized speed.
Flexibility and Customization: RestSharp offers a more customizable approach to build and configure HTTP requests, allowing developers to tailor their requests with various parameters, headers, and authentication methods. On the other hand, OkHttp simplifies request configuration with a fluent API but may lack the level of customization that RestSharp provides. Depending on the project requirements, developers can choose between flexibility and simplicity when deciding between the two libraries.

OkHttp vs RestSharp

Overview