StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. OpenAPI vs Stoplight

OpenAPI vs Stoplight

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Stoplight
Stoplight
Stacks110
Followers233
Votes9
OpenAPI
OpenAPI
Stacks696
Followers458
Votes6
GitHub Stars19.5K
Forks7.0K

OpenAPI vs Stoplight: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of web development, OpenAPI and Stoplight are two popular technologies used for API documentation and management. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that make them unique in their own ways.

  1. Syntax and Structure: OpenAPI follows a predefined specification that defines the syntax and structure of the API documentation. It uses YAML or JSON format to describe the endpoints, request/response schemas, and other details. On the other hand, Stoplight provides a visual interface where users can create and manage their API documentation using a user-friendly editor. It allows users to define endpoints, parameters, and responses using a graphical interface instead of writing YAML or JSON manually.

  2. Collaboration and Workflow: OpenAPI is designed to be used in a collaborative environment where multiple team members can contribute to the API documentation. It supports version control systems like Git, allowing teams to track changes and work on the documentation simultaneously. Stoplight, on the other hand, provides a centralized platform for API documentation and management. It offers features like role-based access control and collaboration tools, making it easier for teams to work together on the documentation.

  3. API Design and Mocking: OpenAPI focuses primarily on defining the structure and behavior of the API. It provides a specification that can be used as a blueprint for API development. While it does offer some mock server capabilities, it is not as comprehensive as Stoplight's mocking feature. Stoplight offers a built-in mock server that can be used to simulate API responses during the development phase, allowing developers to test their integrations without relying on the actual backend services.

  4. Testing and Validation: OpenAPI provides basic validation capabilities to ensure that the API documentation follows the defined structure and rules. However, it relies on third-party tools for more advanced testing and validation. Stoplight, on the other hand, offers built-in validation features that allow users to test and validate their API documentation directly within the platform. It provides a comprehensive set of validation rules and automated tests to ensure the API documentation is accurate and compliant.

  5. API Governance and Lifecycle Management: OpenAPI focuses on defining the structure and behavior of the API, but it does not provide extensive governance and lifecycle management features. Stoplight, on the other hand, offers a complete API lifecycle management platform. It allows users to define API workflows, track changes, enforce policies, and manage different versions of the API documentation. Stoplight also provides integrations with other tools like CI/CD pipelines, making it easier to manage the API throughout its lifecycle.

  6. Extensibility and Integration: OpenAPI provides a standardized specification that can be extended using custom annotations and extensions. It allows users to add additional information or behavior to the API documentation. Stoplight, on the other hand, provides a plugin system that allows users to extend the functionality of the platform. It offers a marketplace where users can find and install plugins to add features like code generation, documentation generation, and more.

In Summary, OpenAPI and Stoplight have key differences in terms of syntax and structure, collaboration and workflow, API design and mocking, testing and validation, API governance and lifecycle management, and extensibility and integration. These differences make them unique in their own ways, catering to different needs and preferences in API documentation and management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Stoplight
Stoplight
OpenAPI
OpenAPI

Stop writing thousands of lines of specification code. Our intuitive visual editors significantly cut down on design time, and are spec agnostic. Generate OAI (Swagger) and RAML specification code on demand.

It is a publicly available application programming interface that provides developers with programmatic access to a proprietary software application or web service.

Powerful API modeling tools;Robust HTTP request maker;One click hosted documentation;Dynamic API Mocking;API Transformation;Automatic API modeling
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
19.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
7.0K
Stacks
110
Stacks
696
Followers
233
Followers
458
Votes
9
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Responsive team
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to read the template generated
  • 1
    Supports caching
  • 1
    Supports authentication
  • 1
    Supports versioning
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Integrations
No integrations available
PayPal
PayPal
Kong
Kong
SAP HANA
SAP HANA
Talend
Talend
Mule runtime engine
Mule runtime engine

What are some alternatives to Stoplight, OpenAPI?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope