StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. OpenBSD vs Ubuntu

OpenBSD vs Ubuntu

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Stacks80.4K
Followers59.1K
Votes468
OpenBSD
OpenBSD
Stacks46
Followers55
Votes0

OpenBSD vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?

Key Differences between OpenBSD and Ubuntu

Introduction

OpenBSD and Ubuntu are two popular operating systems that are used for a variety of purposes. While OpenBSD focuses on security and stability, Ubuntu is known for its user-friendly interface and extensive software support. In this article, we will explore the key differences between OpenBSD and Ubuntu.

  1. Kernel Differences: OpenBSD uses its own kernel, which is known for its security features and simplicity. On the other hand, Ubuntu uses the Linux kernel, which is more versatile and supports a wider range of hardware and software.

  2. Security Focus: OpenBSD places a strong emphasis on security and has a reputation for being one of the most secure operating systems available. It includes features such as address space layout randomization (ASLR), secure memory management, and strict permission defaults. While Ubuntu also includes some security features, it may not be as strict as OpenBSD in terms of security defaults.

  3. Package Management: Ubuntu uses the Advanced Package Tool (APT) for package management, which makes it easy to install and update software from official repositories. OpenBSD, on the other hand, uses the pkg_add tool for package management, which may not have as extensive a package collection as Ubuntu.

  4. Community Support: Ubuntu has a large and active community of users and developers, providing extensive support and documentation. OpenBSD has a smaller community, but it is known for its helpful and knowledgeable users. Both communities have their own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to support.

  5. Default Configuration: OpenBSD aims for a secure and minimalistic default configuration, which means that certain features may be disabled or need to be manually enabled. Ubuntu, on the other hand, aims for a more user-friendly and feature-rich default configuration, which may include more pre-installed software and services.

  6. Hardware Support: Ubuntu has excellent hardware support and is compatible with a wide range of devices out-of-the-box. OpenBSD, on the other hand, may have more limited hardware support, especially for newer or less common hardware.

In summary, OpenBSD and Ubuntu differ in terms of their kernel, security focus, package management, community support, default configuration, and hardware support. OpenBSD prioritizes security and simplicity, while Ubuntu focuses on user-friendliness and versatility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ubuntu, OpenBSD

Jerome/Zen
Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Decided

Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.

CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)

271k views271k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.

299k views299k
Comments
Govind
Govind

Aug 5, 2020

Decided

Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.

Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.

270k views270k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ubuntu
Ubuntu
OpenBSD
OpenBSD

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

It is a free and secure UNIX-like operating system that emphasizes portability, standardization, correctness, proactive security & integrated cryptography.

-
API and build changes;Kernel randomization;Memory protection;Cryptography and randomization;X11
Statistics
Stacks
80.4K
Stacks
46
Followers
59.1K
Followers
55
Votes
468
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 230
    Free to use
  • 96
    Easy setup for testing discord bot
  • 57
    Gateway Linux Distro
  • 54
    Simple interface
  • 9
    Don't need driver installation in most cases
Cons
  • 5
    Demanding system requirements
  • 4
    Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian
  • 2
    Snapd installed by default
  • 1
    Systemd
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
HTML5
HTML5
C++
C++

What are some alternatives to Ubuntu, OpenBSD?

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase