StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. OpenUI5 vs React

OpenUI5 vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
OpenUI5
OpenUI5
Stacks37
Followers51
Votes5

OpenUI5 vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

OpenUI5 and React are two popular frameworks used for web application development. While both aim to provide an efficient and user-friendly experience, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Flexibility: OpenUI5 is a comprehensive framework that provides ready-to-use UI controls, allowing developers to quickly build applications with predefined components and layouts. On the other hand, React is a JavaScript library that focuses on building reusable components, giving developers greater flexibility in designing custom UI elements.

  2. Architecture: OpenUI5 follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, separating data, logic, and presentation. React, on the other hand, follows a component-based architecture where the UI is built using reusable components that manage their own state and rendering.

  3. Rendering: OpenUI5 uses server-side rendering, where the HTML markup is generated on the server and sent to the client's browser. This approach can impact the initial load time and performance in complex applications. React, on the other hand, uses virtual DOM (Document Object Model) rendering, enabling efficient updates to the UI by minimizing direct manipulation of the actual DOM. This results in faster rendering and better performance.

  4. Learning Curve: OpenUI5 has a steeper learning curve compared to React. OpenUI5 requires knowledge of JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, as well as familiarity with the OpenUI5 framework concepts. React, on the other hand, is relatively easier to learn for developers with a solid understanding of JavaScript.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: React has a larger and more active community compared to OpenUI5, with a wide range of third-party libraries and resources available. This vibrant ecosystem enables developers using React to leverage a wealth of tools and community support. OpenUI5, although less popular, still has an active community and a growing ecosystem.

  6. Integration: OpenUI5 is tightly integrated with SAP technologies and can be used for developing applications within the SAP landscape. It provides seamless integration with SAP backend systems. React, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose framework that can be used in a variety of environments and is not specific to any particular technology stack.

In summary, OpenUI5 and React differ in terms of flexibility, architecture, rendering approach, learning curve, community support, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, OpenUI5

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
OpenUI5
OpenUI5

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is an Open Source JavaScript UI library, maintained by SAP. It lets you build enterprise-ready web applications, responsive to all devices, running on almost any browser of your choice. It’s based on JavaScript, using JQuery as its foundation and follows web standards. It eases your development with a client-side HTML5 rendering library including a rich set of controls and supports data binding to different models (JSON, XML and OData).

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Mvc; Ui; Responsive; Html5; Data-binding; Internationalization; Routing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
37
Followers
147.0K
Followers
51
Votes
4.1K
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 2
    Controls
  • 2
    Enterprise Ready
  • 1
    Easy to Use
Integrations
No integrations available
Font Awesome
Font Awesome
Firebase
Firebase
Redux
Redux
Algolia
Algolia
Sentry
Sentry
Meteor
Meteor
React Router
React Router
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to React, OpenUI5?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase